Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Regulation of NhaA by Protons

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

H+, a most common ion, is involved in very many biological processes. However, most proteins have distinct ranges of pH for function; when the H+ concentration in the cells is too high or too low, protons turn into very potent stressors to all cells. Therefore, all living cells are strictly dependent on homeostasis mechanisms that regulate their intracellular pH. Na+/H+ antiporters play primary role in pH homeostatic mechanisms both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Regulation by pH is a property common to these antiporters. They are equipped with a pH sensor to perceive the pH signal and a pH transducer to transduce the signal into a change in activity. Determining the crystal structure of NhaA, the Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli have provided the basis for understanding in a realistic rational way the unique regulation of an antiporter by pH and the mechanism of the antiport activity. The physical separation between the pH sensor/transducer and the active site revealed by the structure entailed long‐range pH‐induced conformational changes for NhaA pH activation. As yet, it is not possible to decide whether the amino acid participating in the pH sensor and the pH transducer overlap or are separated. The pH sensor/transducer is not a single amino acid but rather a cluster of electrostatically interacting residues. Thus, integrating structural, computational, and experimental approaches are essential to reveal how the pH signal is perceived and transduced to activate the pH regulated protein. © 2011 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 1:1711‐1719, 2011.

Comprehensive Physiology offers downloadable PowerPoint presentations of figures for non-profit, educational use, provided the content is not modified and full credit is given to the author and publication.

Download a PowerPoint presentation of all images


Figure 1. Figure 1.

Properties of NhaA. (A) ΔpH‐driven 22Na+/H+ antiporter activity at pH 8.5 and (B) passive efflux (ΔpH and ΔΨ = 0 by the presence of acetate and valinomycin/KCl) as a function of pH were measured in proteoliposomes containing purified NhaA. Experimental details in 57.

Figure 2. Figure 2.

General architecture of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter 22. (A) Ribbon representation of the crystal structure viewed parallel to the membrane (broken line). The 12 transmembranes (TMs) are labeled with Roman numerals. The cytoplasmic and periplasmic funnels are marked (black line). Cytoplasmic or periplasmic‐oriented TMs are denoted as c and p, respectively. (B) Functional organization in NhaA. A stick‐and‐ball representation of functionally important residues in the putative active site (red or black) and the pH sensor (yellow or magenta). (C) The TMs IV‐XI assembly with the interrupted TMs and the putative active site (black circle).

Figure 3. Figure 3.

NhaA mutants with different response to pH. Everted membrane vesicles were prepared from the bacterial strain EP432 expressing the indicated mutations. The Na+/H+ antiporter activity was determined at the indicated pH values using Acridine orange fluorescence to monitor ΔpH in the presence of 10 mM (continuous line) or 100 mM (broken line) NaCl as described in 11,12. The results are expressed as end level of dequenching.

Figure 4. Figure 4.

Clusters of amino acid residues in NhaA with strongly electrostatic interaction as revealed in silico by multiconformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) analysis. Cluster I (magenta) cluster II (white) cluster III (yellow), and cluster IV (green) are shown. Zones of negative and positive potential are colored in red and blue, respectively. This figure was prepared after 34.

Figure 5. Figure 5.

Conformational change in NhaA at K249 identified by trypsin digestion. Purified His‐taged NhaA was subjected to trypsin digestion at the indicated pH values and run on SDS‐PAGE. The pH profile of NhaA Na/H antiport and the trypsin digestion are shown in blue and green. For further details see 14.



Figure 1.

Properties of NhaA. (A) ΔpH‐driven 22Na+/H+ antiporter activity at pH 8.5 and (B) passive efflux (ΔpH and ΔΨ = 0 by the presence of acetate and valinomycin/KCl) as a function of pH were measured in proteoliposomes containing purified NhaA. Experimental details in 57.



Figure 2.

General architecture of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter 22. (A) Ribbon representation of the crystal structure viewed parallel to the membrane (broken line). The 12 transmembranes (TMs) are labeled with Roman numerals. The cytoplasmic and periplasmic funnels are marked (black line). Cytoplasmic or periplasmic‐oriented TMs are denoted as c and p, respectively. (B) Functional organization in NhaA. A stick‐and‐ball representation of functionally important residues in the putative active site (red or black) and the pH sensor (yellow or magenta). (C) The TMs IV‐XI assembly with the interrupted TMs and the putative active site (black circle).



Figure 3.

NhaA mutants with different response to pH. Everted membrane vesicles were prepared from the bacterial strain EP432 expressing the indicated mutations. The Na+/H+ antiporter activity was determined at the indicated pH values using Acridine orange fluorescence to monitor ΔpH in the presence of 10 mM (continuous line) or 100 mM (broken line) NaCl as described in 11,12. The results are expressed as end level of dequenching.



Figure 4.

Clusters of amino acid residues in NhaA with strongly electrostatic interaction as revealed in silico by multiconformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) analysis. Cluster I (magenta) cluster II (white) cluster III (yellow), and cluster IV (green) are shown. Zones of negative and positive potential are colored in red and blue, respectively. This figure was prepared after 34.



Figure 5.

Conformational change in NhaA at K249 identified by trypsin digestion. Purified His‐taged NhaA was subjected to trypsin digestion at the indicated pH values and run on SDS‐PAGE. The pH profile of NhaA Na/H antiport and the trypsin digestion are shown in blue and green. For further details see 14.

References
 1. Appel M, Hizlan D, Vinothkumar KR, Ziegler C, Kuhlbrandt W. Conformations of NhaA, the Na+/H+ exchanger from Escherichia coli, in the pH‐activated and ion‐translocating states. J Mol Biol 388: 659‐672, 2009.
 2. Apse MP, Blumwald E. Na+ transport in plants. FEBS Lett 581: 2247‐2254, 2007.
 3. Arkin IT, Xu H, Jensen MO, Arbely E, Bennett ER, Bowers KJ, Chow E, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Flitman‐Tene R, Gregersen BA, Klepeis JL, Kolossvary I, Shan Y, Shaw DE. Mechanism of Na+/H+ antiporting. Science 317: 799‐803, 2007.
 4. Battaglino RA, Pham L, Morse LR, Vokes M, Sharma A, Odgren PR, Yang M, Sasaki H, Stashenko P. NHA‐oc/NHA2: A mitochondrial cation‐proton antiporter selectively expressed in osteoclasts. Bone 42: 180‐192, 2008.
 5. Brett CL, Donowitz M, Rao R. Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288: 223‐239, 2005.
 6. Bury‐Mone S, Skouloubris S, Labigne A, De Reuse H. The Helicobacter pylori UreI protein: Role in adaptation to acidity and identification of residues essential for its activity and for acid activation. Mol Microbiol 42: 1021‐1034, 2001.
 7. Casey JR, Grinstein S, Orlowski J. Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 50‐61, 2010.
 8. Day JP, Wan S, Allen AK, Kean L, Davies SA, Gray JV, Dow JA. Identification of two partners from the bacteria Kef exchanger family for the apical plasma membrane V‐ATPase of metazoa. J Cell Sci 121: 2612‐2619, 2008.
 9. Fliegel L. Molecular biology of the myocardial Na+/H+ exchanger. J Mol Cell Cardiol 44: 228‐237, 2008.
 10. Fuster DG, Zhang J, Shi M, Bobulescu IA, Andersson S, Moe OW. Characterization of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger NHA2. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 1547‐1556, 2008.
 11. Galili L, Herz K, Dym O, Padan E. Unraveling functional and structural interactions between transmembrane domains IV and XI of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279: 23104‐23113, 2004.
 12. Galili L, Rothman A, Kozachkov L, Rimon A, Padan E. Trans membrane domain IV is involved in ion transport activity and pH regulation of the NhaA‐Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 41: 609‐617, 2002.
 13. Gerchman Y, Olami Y, Rimon A, Taglicht D, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Histidine‐226 is part of the pH sensor of NhaA, a Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 1212‐1216, 1993.
 14. Gerchman Y, Rimon A, Padan E. A pH‐dependent conformational change of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli involves loop VIII‐IX, plays a role in the pH response of the protein, and is maintained by the pure protein in dodecyl maltoside. J Biol Chem 274: 24617‐24624, 1999.
 15. Gonzales EB, Kawate T, Gouaux E. Pore architecture and ion sites in acid‐sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature 460: 599‐604, 2009.
 16. Goswami P, Paulino C, Hizlan D, Vonck J, Yildiz O, Kuhlbrandt W. Structure of the archaeal Na(+)/H(+) antiporter NhaP1 and functional role of transmembrane helix 1. Embo J 30: 439‐449, 2011
 17. Guan L, Kaback HR. Site‐directed alkylation of cysteine to test solvent accessibility of membrane proteins. Nat Protoc 2: 2012‐2017, 2007.
 18. Harel‐Bronstein M, Dibrov P, Olami Y, Pinner E, Schuldiner S, Padan E. MH1, a second‐site revertant of an Escherichia coli mutant lacking Na+/H+ antiporters (delta nhaA delta nhaB), regains Na+ resistance and a capacity to excrete Na+ in a delta microH(+)‐independent fashion. J Biol Chem 270: 3816‐3822, 1995.
 19. Hayashi H, Szaszi K, Coady‐Osberg N, Orlowski J, Kinsella JL, Grinstein S. A slow pH‐dependent conformational transition underlies a novel mode of activation of the epithelial Na+/H+ exchanger‐3 isoform. J Biol Chem 277: 11090‐11096, 2002.
 20. Herz K, Rimon A, Olkhova E, Kozachkov L, Padan E. Transmembrane segment II of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter lines the cation passage, and Asp65 is critical for pH activation of the antiporter. J Biol Chem 285: 2211‐2220, 2010
 21. Hilger D, Jung H, Padan E, Wegener C, Vogel KP, Steinhoff HJ, Jeschke G. Assessing oligomerization of membrane proteins by four‐pulse DEER: pH‐dependent dimerization of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of E. coli. Biophys J 89: 1328‐1338, 2005.
 22. Hunte C, Screpanti M, Venturi M, Rimon A, Padan E, Michel H. Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature 534: 1197‐1202, 2005.
 23. Ivey DM, Guffanti AA, Zemsky J, Pinner E, Karpel R, Padan E, Schuldiner S, Krulwich TA. Cloning and characterization of a putative Ca2+/H+ antiporter gene from Escherichia coli upon functional complementation of Na+/H+ antiporter‐deficient strains by the overexpressed gene. J Biol Chem 268: 11296‐11303, 1993.
 24. Kozachkov L, Herz K, and Padan E. Functional and Structural Interactions of the Transmembrane Domain X of NhaA, Na+/H+ Antiporter of Escherichia coli, at Physiological pH. Biochemistry 46: 2419‐2430, 2007.
 25. Krishnamurthy H, Piscitelli CL, Gouaux E. Unlocking the molecular secrets of sodium‐coupled transporters. Nature 459: 347‐355, 2009.
 26. Landau M, Herz K, Padan E, Ben‐Tal N. Model structure of the Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1): Functional and clinical implications. J Biol Chem 282: 37854‐37863, 2007.
 27. Liechti LA, Berneche S, Bargeton B, Iwaszkiewicz J, Roy S, Michielin O, Kellenberger S. A combined computational and functional approach identifies new residues involved in pH‐dependent gating of ASIC1a. J Biol Chem 285: 16315‐16329, 2010.
 28. Malo ME, Fliegel L. Physiological role and regulation of the Na+/H+ exchanger. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 84: 1081‐1095, 2006.
 29. Menezes ME, Roepe PD, Kaback HR. Design of a membrane transport protein for fluorescence spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 1638‐1642, 1990.
 30. Mollenhauer‐Rektorschek M, Hanauer G, Sachs G, Melchers K. Expression of UreI is required for intragastric transit and colonization of gerbil gastric mucosa by Helicobacter pylori. Res Microbiol 153: 659‐666, 2002.
 31. Nygaard EB, Lagerstedt JO, Bjerre G, Shi B, Budamagunta M, Poulsen KA, Meinild S, Rigor RR, Voss JC, Cala PM, Pedersen SF. Structural modeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1, NHE1. J Biol Chem 286: 634‐648, 2011.
 32. Ohyama T, Igarashi K, Kobayashi H. Physiological role of the chaA gene in sodium and calcium circulations at a high pH in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 176: 4311‐4315, 1994.
 33. Olami Y, Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Rothman A, Padan E. Histidine 225, a residue of the NhaA‐Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli is exposed and faces the cell exterior. J Biol Chem 272: 1761‐1768, 1997.
 34. Olkhova E, Hunte C, Screpanti E, Padan E, Michel H. Multiconformation continuum electrostatics analysis of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli with functional implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2629‐2634, 2006.
 35. Olkhova E, Kozachkov L, Padan E, Michel H. Combined computational and biochemical study reveals the importance of electrostatic interactions between the “pH sensor” and the cation binding site of the sodium/proton antiporter NhaA of Escherichia coli. Proteins 76: 548‐559, 2009.
 36. Olkhova E, Padan E, Michel H. The influence of protonation states on the dynamics of the NhaA antiporter from Escherichia coli. Biophysics J 92: 3784‐3791, 2007.
 37. Orlowski J, Grinstein S. Diversity of the mammalian sodium/proton exchanger SLC9 gene family. Pflug Arch 447: 549‐565, 2004.
 38. Orlowski J, Grinstein S. Emerging roles of alkali cation/proton exchangers in organellar homeostasis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19: 483‐492, 2007.
 39. Padan E. The enlightening encounter between structure and function in the NhaA Na+‐H+ antiporter. Trends Biochem Sci 33: 435‐443, 2008.
 40. Padan E, Bibi E, Masahiro I, Krulwich TA. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: New insights. Biochim Biophys Acta 1717: 67‐88, 2005.
 41. Padan E, Kozachkov L, Herz K, Rimon A NhaA crystal structure: Functional‐structural insights. J Exp Biol 212: 1593‐1603, 2009.
 42. Padan E, Tzubery T, Herz K, Kozachkov L, Rimon A, Galili L. NhaA of Escherichia coli, as a model of a pH‐regulated Na+/H+ antiporter. Biochim Biophys Acta 1658: 2‐13, 2004.
 43. Padan E, Venturi M, Michel H, Hunte C. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against native epitopes of NhaA, the Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 441: 53‐58, 1998.
 44. Padan E, Zilberstein D, Rottenberg H. The proton electrochemical gradient in Escherichia coli cells. Eur J Biochem 63: 533‐541, 1976.
 45. Pham L, Purcell P, Morse L, Stashenko P, Battaglino RA. Expression analysis of nha‐oc/NHA2: A novel gene selectively expressed in osteoclasts. Gene Expr Patterns 7: 846‐851, 2007.
 46. Pinner E, Kotler Y, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Physiological role of nhaB, a specific Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 268: 1729‐1734, 1993.
 47. Putney LK, Denker SP, Barber DL. The changing face of the Na+/H+ exchanger, NHE1: Structure, regulation, and cellular actions. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 527‐552, 2002.
 48. Ramsey IS, Mokrab Y, Carvacho I, Sands ZA, Sansom MS, Clapham DE. An aqueous H+ permeation pathway in the voltage‐gated proton channel Hv1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 869‐875, 2009.
 49. Ramsey IS, Ruchti E, Kaczmarek JS, Clapham DE. Hv1 proton channels are required for high‐level NADPH oxidase‐dependent superoxide production during the phagocyte respiratory burst. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 7642‐7647, 2009.
 50. Rheault MR, Okech BA, Keen SB, Miller MM, Meleshkevitch EA, Linser PJ, Boudko DY, Harvey WR. Molecular cloning, phylogeny and localization of AgNHA1: The first Na+/H+ antiporter (NHA) from a metazoan, Anopheles gambiae. J Exp Biol 210: 3848‐3861, 2007.
 51. Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Kariv Z, Padan E. A point mutation (G338S) and its suppressor mutations affect both the pH response of the NhaA‐Na+/H+ antiporter as well as the growth phenotype of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 273: 26470‐26476, 1998.
 52. Sachs G, Weeks DL, Wen Y, Marcus EA, Scott DR, Melchers K. Acid acclimation by Helicobacter pylori. Physiology (Bethesda) 20: 429‐38, 2005.
 53. Schushan M, Xiang M, Bogomiakov P, Padan E, Rao R, Ben‐Tal N. Model‐guided mutagenesis drives functional studies of human NHA2, implicated in hypertension. J Mol Biol 396: 1181‐1196, 2009.
 54. Screpanti E, Padan E, Rimon A, Michel H, Hunte C. Crucial steps in the structure determination of the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA in its native conformation. J Mol Biol 362: 192‐202, 2006.
 55. Slonczewski JL, Fujisawa M, Dopson M, Krulwich TA. Cytoplasmic pH measurement and homeostasis in bacteria and archaea. Adv Microb Physiol 55: 1‐79, 317, 2009.
 56. Smirnova I, Kasho V, Sugihara J, Kaback HR. Probing of the rates of alternating access in LacY with Trp fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21561‐21566, 2009.
 57. Taglicht D, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Overproduction and purification of a functional Na+/H+ antiporter coded by nhaA (ant) from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 266: 11289‐11294, 1991.
 58. Taglicht D, Padan E, Schuldiner S. Proton‐sodium stoichiometry of NhaA, an electrogenic antiporter from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 268: 5382‐5387, 1993.
 59. Tzubery T. The relationship between structure, pH sensing and pH regulation of NhaA‐Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli PhD. Hebrew University Jerusalem, 2008.
 60. Tzubery T, Rimon A, Padan E. Mutation E252C increases drastically the Km value for Na+ and causes an alkaline shift of the pH dependence of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279: 3265‐3272, 2003.
 61. Tzubery T, Rimon A, Padan E. Structure‐based functional study reveals multiple roles of TMS IX and loop VIII‐IX in NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli at physiological pH J Biol Chem 283: 15975‐15987, 2008.
 62. Venturi M, Rimon A, Gerchman Y, Hunte C, Padan E, Michel H. The monoclonal antibody 1F6 identifies a pH‐dependent conformational change in the hydrophilic NH2 terminus of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 275: 4734‐4742, 2000.
 63. Wakabayashi S, Pang T, Hisamitsu T, Shigekawa M The sodium‐ Hydrogen Exchange, from Molecule to its Role in Disease. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2003.
 64. Weeks DL, Eskandari S, Scott DR, Sachs G. A H+‐gated urea channel: The link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization. Science 287: 482‐485, 2000.
 65. Weeks DL, Gushansky G, Scott DR, Sachs G. Mechanism of proton gating of a urea channel. J Biol Chem 279: 9944‐9950, 2004.
 66. Weitzman C, Consler TG, Kaback HR. Fluorescence of native single‐Trp mutants in the lactose permease from Escherichia coli: Structural properties and evidence for a substrate‐induced conformational change. Protein Sci 4: 2310‐2318, 1995.
 67. West IC, Mitchell P. Proton/sodium ion antiport in Escherichia coli. Biochem J 144: 87‐90, 1974.
 68. Xiang M, Feng M, Muend S, Rao R. A human Na+/H+ antiporter sharing evolutionary origins with bacterial NhaA may be a candidate gene for essential hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 18677‐18681, 2007.
 69. Yamaguchi T, Aharon GS, Sottosanto JB, Blumwald E. Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter cation selectivity is regulated by calmodulin from within the vacuole in a Ca2+‐ and pH‐dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 16107‐16112, 2005.
 70. Yu XJ, McGourty K, Liu M, Unsworth KE, Holden DW. pH sensing by intracellular Salmonella induces effector translocation. Science 328: 1040‐1043, 2010.
 71. Zilberstein D, Agmon V, Schuldiner S, Padan E. Escherichia coli intracellular pH, membrane potential, and cell growth. J Bacteriol 158: 246‐252, 1984.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

Etana Padan. Regulation of NhaA by Protons. Compr Physiol 2011, 1: 1711-1719. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100078