Comprehensive Physiology offers downloadable PowerPoint presentations of figures for
non-profit, educational use, provided the content is not modified and full credit is given to the
author and publication.
Figure 1. Proposed signal transduction pathways for calcium regulation of cAMP‐dependent B‐Raf signaling to MEK/ERK and cell proliferation. Normal cell proliferation is controlled by growth factors binding to receptor tyrosine kinase with sequential activation of Ras3Raf 13MEK3ERK to induce cell proliferation. There is a phenotypic difference between normal kidney cells and PKD cells in the cAMP effect on proliferation. (A) In NHK cells, basal intracellular Ca2+ levels, controlled by a variety of Ca2+ entry mechanisms, maintain the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI 3‐K) and Akt, preventing cAMP‐dependent activation of B‐Raf. B‐Raf kinase activity is inhibited by Akt phosphorylation of an inhibitory site. cAMP agonists, for example, arginine vasopressin, inhibit Raf‐1 through a protein kinase A–dependent mechanism. Thus, ERK activation and cell proliferation are controlled by a balance of signals (positive and negative) that affect Raf‐1 in NHK cells. (B) In PKD cells, a reduction in intracellular Ca2+ levels, as a result of a loss of PC‐1/PC‐2 function, decreases PI 3‐K activity, relieving B‐Raf inhibition by Akt. cAMP then signals through B‐Raf to activate MEK and ERK and to stimulate cell proliferation.
Figure 2. Diagram of the PKD1 protein, polycystin‐1 (left) and the PKD2 protein, polycystin‐2, and their interaction through coiled‐coil domains in the C‐terminal tails (according to the revised molecular model).6 Details of the domains and regions of homology are shown in the key. Recently, it has been proposed that polycystin‐1 may activate transcription directly by cleavage and translocation of the C‐terminus to the nucleus, a process found in other transmembrane proteins. The cleavage site in the GPS region and possible cleavage sites in the C‐terminal tail of polycystin‐1 are marked with arrows. TRP, transient receptor potential.
Figure 3. Diagram depicting putative pathways up‐ or downregulated in PKD and rationale for treatment with V2 receptor antagonists, somatostatin, triptolide; tyrosine kinase, src, MEK, TNFa, mTOR, or CDK inhibitors; metformin, and CFTR or KCa3.1 inhibitors (green boxes). Dysregulation of [Ca2+]i, increased concentrations of cAMP, mislocalization of ErbB receptors, and upregulation of EGF, IGF1, VEGF, and TNFa occur in cells/kidneys bearing PKD mutations. Increased accumulation of cAMP in polycystic kidneys may result from: (i) disruption of the polycystin complex, as PC‐1 may act as a Gi protein coupled receptor; (ii) stimulation of Ca2+ inhibitable AC6 and/or inhibition of Ca2+‐dependent PDE1 by a reduction in [Ca2+]i; (iii) increased levels of circulating vasopressin due to an intrinsic concentrating defect; and/or (iv) upregulation of vasopressin V2 receptors. Increased cAMP levels contribute to cystogenesis by stimulating chloride and fluid secretion. In addition, cAMP stimulates mitogen‐activated protein kinase/extracellularly regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling and cell proliferation in an Src‐ and Ras‐dependent manner in cyst derived cells or in wild‐type tubular epithelial cells treated with Ca2+ channel blockers or in a low Ca2+ medium. Activation of tyrosine kinase receptors by ligands present in cystic fluid also contributes to the stimulation of MAPK/ERK signaling and cell proliferation. Phosphorylation of tuberin by ERK (or inadequate targeting to the plasma membrane due to defective interaction with polycystin‐1) may lead to the dissociation of tuberin and hamartin and lead to the activation of Rheb and mTOR. Upregulation of TNFa or downregulation of AMPK signaling may also stimulate mTOR signaling through inhibition of the tuberin–hamartin complex. Activation of AMPK may also blunt cystogenesis through inhibition of CFTR and ERK. Upregulation of Wnt signaling stimulates mTOR and b‐catenin signaling. ERK and mTOR activation promotes G1/S transition and cell proliferation through regulation of cyclin D1, phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (RB) by CDK4/6‐cyclin D and CDK2‐cyclin E, and the release of the E2F transcription factor. AC‐VI, adenylate cyclase 6; AMPK, AMP kinase; CDK, cyclin‐dependent kinase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; MAPK, mitogen‐activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PC‐1, polycystin‐1; PC‐2, polycystin‐2; PDE, phosphodiesterase; PKA, protein kinase A; R, somatostatin sst2 receptor; TSC, tuberous sclerosis proteins tuberin (TSC2) and hamartin (TSC1); V2R, vasopressin V2 receptor; V2RA, vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists.
Figure 1. Proposed signal transduction pathways for calcium regulation of cAMP‐dependent B‐Raf signaling to MEK/ERK and cell proliferation. Normal cell proliferation is controlled by growth factors binding to receptor tyrosine kinase with sequential activation of Ras3Raf 13MEK3ERK to induce cell proliferation. There is a phenotypic difference between normal kidney cells and PKD cells in the cAMP effect on proliferation. (A) In NHK cells, basal intracellular Ca2+ levels, controlled by a variety of Ca2+ entry mechanisms, maintain the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI 3‐K) and Akt, preventing cAMP‐dependent activation of B‐Raf. B‐Raf kinase activity is inhibited by Akt phosphorylation of an inhibitory site. cAMP agonists, for example, arginine vasopressin, inhibit Raf‐1 through a protein kinase A–dependent mechanism. Thus, ERK activation and cell proliferation are controlled by a balance of signals (positive and negative) that affect Raf‐1 in NHK cells. (B) In PKD cells, a reduction in intracellular Ca2+ levels, as a result of a loss of PC‐1/PC‐2 function, decreases PI 3‐K activity, relieving B‐Raf inhibition by Akt. cAMP then signals through B‐Raf to activate MEK and ERK and to stimulate cell proliferation.
Figure 2. Diagram of the PKD1 protein, polycystin‐1 (left) and the PKD2 protein, polycystin‐2, and their interaction through coiled‐coil domains in the C‐terminal tails (according to the revised molecular model).6 Details of the domains and regions of homology are shown in the key. Recently, it has been proposed that polycystin‐1 may activate transcription directly by cleavage and translocation of the C‐terminus to the nucleus, a process found in other transmembrane proteins. The cleavage site in the GPS region and possible cleavage sites in the C‐terminal tail of polycystin‐1 are marked with arrows. TRP, transient receptor potential.
Figure 3. Diagram depicting putative pathways up‐ or downregulated in PKD and rationale for treatment with V2 receptor antagonists, somatostatin, triptolide; tyrosine kinase, src, MEK, TNFa, mTOR, or CDK inhibitors; metformin, and CFTR or KCa3.1 inhibitors (green boxes). Dysregulation of [Ca2+]i, increased concentrations of cAMP, mislocalization of ErbB receptors, and upregulation of EGF, IGF1, VEGF, and TNFa occur in cells/kidneys bearing PKD mutations. Increased accumulation of cAMP in polycystic kidneys may result from: (i) disruption of the polycystin complex, as PC‐1 may act as a Gi protein coupled receptor; (ii) stimulation of Ca2+ inhibitable AC6 and/or inhibition of Ca2+‐dependent PDE1 by a reduction in [Ca2+]i; (iii) increased levels of circulating vasopressin due to an intrinsic concentrating defect; and/or (iv) upregulation of vasopressin V2 receptors. Increased cAMP levels contribute to cystogenesis by stimulating chloride and fluid secretion. In addition, cAMP stimulates mitogen‐activated protein kinase/extracellularly regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling and cell proliferation in an Src‐ and Ras‐dependent manner in cyst derived cells or in wild‐type tubular epithelial cells treated with Ca2+ channel blockers or in a low Ca2+ medium. Activation of tyrosine kinase receptors by ligands present in cystic fluid also contributes to the stimulation of MAPK/ERK signaling and cell proliferation. Phosphorylation of tuberin by ERK (or inadequate targeting to the plasma membrane due to defective interaction with polycystin‐1) may lead to the dissociation of tuberin and hamartin and lead to the activation of Rheb and mTOR. Upregulation of TNFa or downregulation of AMPK signaling may also stimulate mTOR signaling through inhibition of the tuberin–hamartin complex. Activation of AMPK may also blunt cystogenesis through inhibition of CFTR and ERK. Upregulation of Wnt signaling stimulates mTOR and b‐catenin signaling. ERK and mTOR activation promotes G1/S transition and cell proliferation through regulation of cyclin D1, phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (RB) by CDK4/6‐cyclin D and CDK2‐cyclin E, and the release of the E2F transcription factor. AC‐VI, adenylate cyclase 6; AMPK, AMP kinase; CDK, cyclin‐dependent kinase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; MAPK, mitogen‐activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PC‐1, polycystin‐1; PC‐2, polycystin‐2; PDE, phosphodiesterase; PKA, protein kinase A; R, somatostatin sst2 receptor; TSC, tuberous sclerosis proteins tuberin (TSC2) and hamartin (TSC1); V2R, vasopressin V2 receptor; V2RA, vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists.
Contact Editor
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.
* Required Field
How to Cite
Joseph Ghata, Benjamin D. Cowley. Polycystic Kidney Disease. Compr Physiol 2017, 7: 945-975. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160018