Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Central Nervous Mechanisms in Mechanoreceptive Sensibility

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Organization of Prethalamic Components of Somatic Afferent System
1.1 Dorsal Column System
1.2 Ascending Systems Originating in Dorsal Horn
1.3 Dorsal Column Nuclear Complex and Its Efferent Projections
1.4 Somesthetic Defects Produced by Lesions of Spinal Pathways
1.5 Summary: Prethalamic Components
2 Functional Organization of Thalamocortical Components of Somatic Afferent System
2.1 Thalamic Targets of Ascending Somesthetic Pathways
2.2 Organization of Thalamic Somesthetic Nuclei
3 Functional Organization of Somatic Sensory Areas of Cerebral Cortex
3.1 Introduction and Background
3.2 Structure and Connectivity of Somatic Sensory Areas
3.3 Functional Organization of Postcentral Gyrus, SI
3.4 Functional Organization of Second Somatic Area, SII
4 Dynamic Neural Operations in Somesthesis
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Central Neural Mechanisms in Tactile Sensibility
4.3 Central Neural Mechanisms in Flutter‐Vibration
5 Modifiability of Microconnectivity in Somatic Afferent System
5.1 null
Figure 1. Figure 1.

Dermatomal and somatotopic representations in gracile tract at lumbar and cervical levels, illustrating dorsal column “shuffle” for topography that occurs in the projection. Drawings to left show greatly increasing overlap in dermatomal projections. Drawings to right show results of electrophysiological experiments; they reveal somatotopic representation, with improvement of resolution in projection from lumbar to cervical levels. This is accompanied by a modality shuffle, described in text.

From Whitsel et al. 623
Figure 2. Figure 2.

Diagram of degree of modality convergence of primary afferents upon cells of origin of spinocervical tract in decerebrate (left column) and spinal (right column) cat. Difference is attributed to action of descending systems originating in brain stem that maintain in a dynamic way the modality specificities shown to left. That action is revealed by wide modality convergences that appear when descending influences are removed in spinal cat (right). HFT, HFG, and HFD: three subclasses of hair follicle afferents.

From Brown 85
Figure 3. Figure 3.

A: camera lucida reconstruction of 2 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn, closely adjacent in rostrocaudal direction, stained by intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase. Dendrites of the 2 cells are closely entwined. Peripheral receptive field of each neuron is shown directly below; that of neuron to left is completely overlapped by that of neuron to right. B: similar reconstructions of 2 SCT cells closely adjacent in mediolateral direction. Somata are only 135 μm apart, but their dendrites are completely separate and their peripheral receptive fields do not overlap. These arrangements create rostrocaudal columnar organization of dorsal horn neurons from which axons of SCT arise.

From Brown et al. 96
Figure 4. Figure 4.

A: positions within dorsal horn in a 2.5‐mm length of L7 spinal segment of cat at which extracellular recordings were made from 53 different neurons of origin of spinocervical tract (SCT) fibers. Observations made in grid of microelectrode penetrations at 250‐μm intervals. Band of cells centers on Rexed's lamina IV. B: horizontal distribution of SCT neurons from another experiment, showing estimated positions of 60 neurons identified by extracellular recording in an experiment similar to that of A. C: plan view of opposite side of cord in same animal as in B, in which 60 SCT neurons were identified after retrograde staining with horseradish peroxidase.

A: from Brown et al. 92; B, C: from Brown et al. 89
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Left: figurine map showing receptive fields of 60 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn identified in plan plot of Fig. 4B. There is an organization into longitudinal columns of neurons; receptive fields of those in a single column overlap greatly. As one moves in the transverse direction the receptive fields of neurons encountered jump abruptly from one location to another on body surface. Right: somatotopic schema of representation of hindleg in dorsal horn SCT cells at lumbosacral level of cat's spinal cord. Representation is homotopic, except that there is none for glabrous skin of pad.

From Brown et al. 89
Figure 6. Figure 6.

Left: figurine map showing receptive fields of 60 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn identified in plan plot of Fig. 4B. There is an organization into longitudinal columns of neurons; receptive fields of those in a single column overlap greatly. As one moves in the transverse direction the receptive fields of neurons encountered jump abruptly from one location to another on body surface. Right: somatotopic schema of representation of hindleg in dorsal horn SCT cells at lumbosacral level of cat's spinal cord. Representation is homotopic, except that there is none for glabrous skin of pad.

From Brown et al. 89
Figure 7. Figure 7.

Schematic diagram of spinocervicothalamic (SC‐LC) and the spinomedullothalamic system (SM‐Z) in cat, described in text. C, T, L: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions, respectively, of spinal cord; VPL, ventrobasal complex of thalamus; POm, medial portion of posterior nuclear group of thalamus; CL, centrolateral nucleus of thalamus; C and G, relative positions of cuneate and gracile nuclei; vertical dashed line, midline; Cb, cerebellum.

From Willis and Coggleshall 630
Figure 8. Figure 8.

Schematic representation of dorsal column nuclei and spinal trigeminal nucleus of cat, made from a reconstruction of serial sections. TRIG, spinal trigeminal nucleus; CUN, cuneate nucleus; EX CUN, external cuneate nucleus; G, gracile nucleus. Nuclei × and y are not shown.

Figure courtesy of R. W. Dykes
Figure 9. Figure 9.

Two selected transverse sections through medulla of cat at level of dorsal column nuclear complex. Left: projections of 4 dorsal roots, determined in antegrade tracer experiment by Keller and Hand 330. Right: cartoon of representation of body surfaces of cat within DCN and trigeminal nucleus, composed by Hand from Kruger et al. 348 and from Hand 244. Thus in efferent projection from these nuclei into medial lemniscus to ventrobasal complex of thalamus, representation of body inverts and that of head reverses and inverts, to compose distorted but normal image of representation at thalamic level.

Figure 10. Figure 10.

Results of experiment in which microelectrode penetrations were made in horizontal plane, passing from medial to lateral through dorsal column nuclear (DCN) complex of a cat. Receptive fields and modality properties of single neurons and small clusters of neurons of DCN were determined at 50‐μm intervals. Symbols: black, activation by stimulation of deep tissues; diagonal lines, cutaneous; cross‐hatching, Pacinian; white, not identified. Letters beside each reconstruction indicate further modality subdivisions: S, slowly adapting; R, rapidly adapting; L, low velocity; P, Pacinian; T, “tap”. G, gracile nucleus; C, cuneate nucleus; RC, rostral part of cuneate nucleus; EC, external nucleus; ST, spinal trigeminal nucleus. Results show modular organization of DCN complex.

From Dykes, et al. 168
Figure 11. Figure 11.

Figurine map showing general pattern of representation of body in single plane of ventrobasal complex of thalamus of monkey, Macaca mulatta, obtained in a gross electrode, evoked‐potential experiment under deep barbiturate anesthesia. Inset: diagram of thalamus in frontal plane studied; dots, points at which electrical activity was evoked by tactile stimulation of body surface; each dot correlates to an appropriately located figurine drawing. Vertical electrode penetrations made at 0.5‐mm intervals in mediolateral direction; recording points 0.5 mm apart in vertical dimension. VBex and VBarc, external and arcuate components of ventrobasal complex; M, mediodorsal nucleus; CM, centre médian; PF, parafascicular nucleus; HP, habenulopeduncular tract; GLD, lateral geniculate nucleus.

From Mountcastle and Henneman 423
Figure 12. Figure 12.

Results of a microelectrode single‐neuron mapping study of ventrobasal complex of a cynomolgus monkey, made under barbiturate anesthesia. Receptive fields of single neurons and of small neuron clusters were determined at about 100‐μm intervals as electrodes were passed in an oblique plane from anterolateral to posteromedial, across ventrobasal complex. They reveal lamellar and modular organization of ventrobasal complex described in text. VPLc and VPLm, the 2 components of ventrobasal complex. Tracks 6A and 7A were made 250 μm dorsal to tracks 6 and 7. Clear or stippled, regions in which neurons and neuron clusters were activated by cutaneous stimuli; hatching, regions activated by stimulation of deep tissues. Bars, locations at which single neurons are studied.

From Jones and Friedman 310
Figure 13. Figure 13.

Results of a microelectrode single‐neuron study of ventrobasal complex of a cynomolgus monkey, made under deep barbiturate anesthesia. Conventions and labeling as for experiment of Fig. 12, except that here vertical penetrations were made from above in same parasagittal plane, indicated by the upper right inset. Lower right inset, results of similar experiment in which vertical penetrations were made from above, all in a single frontal plane.

From Jones and Friedman 310
Figure 14. Figure 14.

Schematic diagram showing on horizontal and frontal planes the lamellar somatotopic representation of contralateral body in ventrobasal complex. Drawings indicate a nearly complete separation of zones for cutaneous and deep modalities. Other evidence, discussed in text, indicates that modules for different modalities are to a certain extent interdigitated in ventrobasal complex.

From Jones and Friedman 310
Figure 15. Figure 15.

Outline drawings (above) of thalamic nuclear configurations in histological sections through posterior third of ventrobasal complex of macaque monkey, showing reconstructions of three microelectrode penetrations (P1, P2, P3) and results obtained in them. Open and solid circles, positions at which single neurons studied were activated by stimulation of deep tissues or of skin, respectively. Insets, locations on body of peripheral receptive fields, correlated with modality; here observations on single neurons and small clusters of neurons are combined. Results indicate modular organization of ventrobasal complex described in text, with occasional mixed sequences of modality, and that deep and cutaneous modules are partially interdigitated, not completely sequestered in separate parts of complex. CL, centrolateral nucleus; CM, centre médian; GMM, magnocellular medial geniculate; GMP, principal nucleus, medial geniculate; ID, laterodorsal nucleus; LP, lateroposterior nucleus; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; PF, parafascicular nucleus; PUL, pulvinar; SG, suprageniculate nucleus; VPL, external portion of ventrobasal complex.

From Poggio and Mountcastle 468
Figure 16. Figure 16.

Examples of peripheral receptive fields of a sample of neurons studied in posterior nuclear group of thalamus of lightly anesthetized cats. Five neurons of this sample were activated by light mechanical stimulation of skin, from very large bilateral receptive fields. Two were responsive only to noxious stimulation, while one (48 cc) responded to either form of stimulation in large but different receptive fields. Ipsilateral side of body is to right in drawings. Stippled: receptive fields of units driven by mechanical stimuli; diagonal stripes: receptive fields of units driven by noxious stimuli.

From Poggio and Mountcastle 467
Figure 17. Figure 17.

Figurine map showing general representation of body surface in postcentral gyrus, as determined with slow‐wave, evoked‐potential method. Each drawing shows body areas within which light mechanical stimulation evoked responses at cortical position of drawing. Black and shading, different intensities of responses. Dashed line at left, depth of central sulcus, so that posterior bank of the central sulcus is turned forward into plane of lateral surface of hemisphere. Similarly, medial wall of the hemisphere and the superior bank of cingular fissure are swung upward into same plane. Upper dashed line, depth of cingular sulcus.

From Woolsey 644
Figure 18. Figure 18.

Diagrams of cortices of rat, rabbit, cat, and rhesus monkey showing locations and general plans of organization of precentral motor (MI), supplementary motor (MII), postcentral sensory (SI), and second somatic (SII) areas. Relations to auditory and visual areas are shown, except for monkey auditory area, which lies hidden on lower bank of Sylvian fissure. For rabbit, cat, and monkey the medial walls of hemispheres are swung upward in drawings to occupy same planes as lateral surfaces.

From Woolsey 644
Figure 19. Figure 19.

Diagram of the extent of areas 3b, 1, and 2 as seen in an external view of lateral surface of cerebral hemisphere of Macaca mulatta; reconstructed from study of serial sections. Almost all of 3b and all of 3a are hidden within the central fissure. A, arcuate sulcus; CS, central sulcus; IP, intraparietal sulcus; L, lunate sulcus; P, principal sulcus; PCS, postcentral sulcus; PR, superior precental sulcus; S, Sylvian fissure; SC, anterior subcentral sulcus; ST, superior temporal sulcus.

From Powell and Mountcastle 473
Figure 20. Figure 20.

Lower two rows show by common symbols the locations of retrogradely labeled rods of cells in ventrobasal complex (VPLc + VPM) of a cynomolgus monkey, after local cortical injections of horseradish peroxidase. Sites of injection of label into postcentral gyrus are shown in outline drawing of right hemisphere, next above. Upper row, peripheral receptive fields of clusters of neurons at injection sites, determined before injection.

From Jones et al. 311
Figure 21. Figure 21.

Schematic diagram showing, on sagittal sections, general pattern of input‐output connections of ventrobasal complex and adjacent nuclei, in cynomolgus monkeys. This drawing presents the “core‐shell” hypothesis, which is based on idea that neurons of cutaneous and deep classes are completely segregated in thalamus and thus in their cortical projections. Alternative view that differs slightly is discussed in text: namely, that while there is a degree of this segregation, the modular sets of slowly and quickly adapting cutaneous neurons and of Pacinian neurons, and the deep modalities, are to a certain extent inter‐digitated in ventrobasal complex, as they are in postcentral gyrus.

From Jones and Friedman 310
Figure 22. Figure 22.

Diagrams to illustrate cortical connections of sensory and motor cortices in monkeys. Dashed line for connection on left indicates a suggested but still uncertain projection from area 1 to area 3b; otherwise, area 3b is a purely feed‐forward unit. At right: open circles, and solid arrowheads, unidirectional projections; solid circles and lines with double arrowheads, reciprocal connections.

Figure 23. Figure 23.

Three‐dimensional model of relation between proliferative layer around ventricular surface of neural tube (VZ) and developing cortical plate (CP), in monkeys.

Model shows that each small area of cortex is generated from a correspondingly small area in proliferative zone. Neurons pass from latter to former along elongated processes of small group of glial guide cells. All neurons produced at a given site in ventricular germinal zone migrate along same glial shafts, and thus reach same cortical location, where they are arranged in vertical units, the ontogenetic columns aî … nî within cortical plate. Thus tangential relations of proliferative units a …n are reproduced in the same xy relations in the aî … nî ontogenetic units in cortex: a topologically ordered relation is maintained between the two in spite of cortical enlargement and infolding. Straight vertical dashed line, mismatch that would occur if migrating neurons took shortest path and did not follow their glial guide cells. Thus tangential position of each cortical neuron is determined by relative position of its precursor cell in proliferative zone. Position of each cortical cell in depth is determined by time of its generation and speed of migration; cortex is constructed in time from inside to outside. From Rakic 485
Figure 24. Figure 24.

How results of nerve regeneration experiments provide evidence for columnar organization of somatic cortex; estimate of size of smallest identifiable functional columnar element. Left: results of an experiment in which a recording microelectrode passed nearly parallel to surface of cortex, through a region of neurons of same cutaneous modality. Adjacent columns are related to sequentially adjoining and overlapping peripheral receptive fields and might thus pass unnoticed. Right: the results obtained in a similar experiment after section and resuture of median nerve, with misdirection of the reinnervating nerve bundles. Sudden jumps of receptive‐field locations at intervals of about 40–60 μm reveal cortical minicolumns.

From Kaas et al. 324
Figure 25. Figure 25.

Upper left: drawing of left hemisphere of brain of owl monkey, showing location of representations of hand in ares 3b and 1 of postcentral gyrus. Upper and lower right: illustrations of how detailed maps are constructed from results of microelectrode mapping experiments. Drawings are of hand area of 3b; here rostral is toward lower edge of drawings, lateral to right. Cutaneous receptive fields on various parts of hand, lower center, were mapped for clusters of neurons encountered in the 172 penetration sites shown in drawing at upper right, where symbols represent centers of receptive fields encountered. Stars, penetrations in which receptive fields were on dorsal surfaces of hand. Boundaries between areas of representation for different skin locations were made by halving distance between adjacent penetrations with different receptive fields. D1‐D5: digits 1–5; P, M, D: proximal, middle and distal phalanges, glabrous surface; P1, P2, P3, P4: 4 pads at bases of digits; P1: insular pads in center of palm; PTH, PH: thenar and hypothenar eminences; H, dorsal surface; W; wrist; F, face.

From Merzenich et al. 401
Figure 26. Figure 26.

Somatotopic organization of representations of body surface in contralateral areas 3b and 1 of cynomolgus macaque monkey. Map determined by method of cluster recording and multiple microelectrode penetrations illustrated in Fig. 28. Left: representations shown on dorsolateral view of left hemisphere. Right: representations as they appear expanded and unfolded, with anterior bank of postcentral gyrus turned forward into plane of drawing. Receptive‐field regions outlined within drawing; heavy lines enclose areas 3b and 1, dotted line, position of central sulcus, and vertical dashed line near top, region along medial wall where portions of representation in areas 3b and 1 are contained in cortex of medial wall of hemisphere. Representation of individual digits of hand and foot outlined and numbered D1‐D5; shaded areas, zones of representation of hairy skin of dorsal surfaces of digits. Summary map constructed from maps obtained in several different animals in which more than one region was mapped in areas 3b and 1; individual maps were combined, based on their overlap.

From Nelson et al. 442
Figure 27. Figure 27.

Detailed evidence that there are 3 representations of digits in somatic sensory cortex of macaque monkeys, 1 each in areas 3b, 1, and 2. A: 3 sets of receptive‐field drawings on outlines of hand show progression, reversal, and regression of fields from tips of fingers toward palm and again out to finger tips as recording sites are moved from anterior edge of 3b toward and across its junction with area 1, and then toward posterior edge of area 1. B: similar evidence for reversals of representations of fingers as recording sites are moved in a similar way across areas 1 and 2. These mirror‐image reversals at the 3b‐1 and 1–2 borders are best evidence for multiple representation hypothesis.

From Kaas et al. 323
Figure 28. Figure 28.

General pattern of representation of deep structures of body in area 2 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys. Sequence from medial to lateral is similar to that of areas 3b and 1, anteriorly. Circles, locations of penetrations in which no neurons drivable by somatic stimuli were observed in these anesthetized animals; these locations were probably in area 5.

From Merzenich et al. 400
Figure 29. Figure 29.

Results of receptive‐field study of neuron of area 3b of postcentral gyrus of lightly anesthetized Macaca mulatta showing gradations in intensity of response to stimuli delivered at different positions in field. Receptive field (right) was determined by light mechanical stimulation of skin. Brief electrical stimuli were delivered at points marked by numerals via small electrodes thrust in skin. Intensity of response falls from center toward each edge of field as latency increases (solid line) and probability of response drops (dashed lines). Electrical stimulation of skin at points 3 and 4 also evoked responses, even though they are outside field determined with physiological stimuli. This wide fringe is discussed in text.

From Mountcastle and Powell 429
Figure 30. Figure 30.

Plot in log‐log coordinates of receptive‐field areas for different portions of body surface, in areas 3b and 1 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys.

From Sur et al. 543
Figure 31. Figure 31.

Degree of overlap of cutaneous receptive fields in areas 3b and 1 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys, plotted against distance between 2 neurons of each pair in tangential dimension of cortex. For fitted straight line, r = 0.79.

From Sur et al. 543
Figure 32. Figure 32.

Experiment showing interdigitation of modules of cortex for slowly and rapidly adapting neurons in area 3b of owl monkey; digits 1–5 are represented in order from lateral to media. A: peristimulus time histograms of activity evoked in neuron of SA type (upper), in one of RA type (middle), and by 600‐μm step indentation of skin (bottom). B: area 3b of owl monkey. C: sites of microelectrode penetrations within and around digit 4 representation in area 3b. Closed circles, penetrations with SA neurons; open circles, penetrations with RA neurons. Blood vessels outlined on surface of cortex. D: representation of 2 cutaneous modalities for digit 4, obtained from penetrations shown in C, showing regions for tip, and for distal, middle, and proximal phalanges. This supports idea of an intermittently recursive mapping for modalities within topographic pattern.

From Sur et al. 546
Figure 33. Figure 33.

Results of microelectrode mapping experiment carried out on forelimb region of first somatic area of anesthetized cat. Above right: region studied shown on drawing of dorsal view of cat brain. Receptive fields and modality types determined in each penetration by recording from small clusters of neurons at depths of 500–1,000 μm below cortical surface. Open triangles, deep; open circles, rapidly adapting; closed circles, slowly adapting cutaneous modalities. Results show modality segregation between areas 3a and 3b, and interdigitated regions for RA and SA cutaneous modalities within 3b.

From Sretavan and Dykes 532
Figure 34. Figure 34.

Schematic diagram illustrating concept of Whitsel et al. that postcentral map of hindleg of squirrel monkey is generated by sorting of afferents of different modality types to different spinal pathways that project in a differential but overlapping manner upon postcentral gyrus, where only a single map is thought to exist. Sorted, rapidly adapting, cutaneous afferents of dorsal columns project via central core of ventrobasal complex‐heavily to distal hindlimb region of cortex, lightly to areas for proximal hindlimb. Afferents from muscle and joints, together with SA cutaneous afferents, after sorting and relay project via dorsolateral columns to border zones of ventrobasal complex and from thence predominantly to areas 3b and 1‐heavily to regions for proximal, lightly to those for distal hindlimb.

From Whitsel et al. 621
Figure 35. Figure 35.

Inset in figure at right: lateral surface of monkey brain, with Sylvian fissure opened and expanded to reveal cortex buried within it; it is the key to the two larger drawings. Left: drawing summarizing studies of cytoarchitecture and sources of thalamic projections to cortex within Sylvian fissure. Cortical areas: 1, 2–3, 7. Auditory field: Al, first; Pa, posterolateral; RL, rostrolateral; Pi, parainsular. Insular fields: Ig, granular; la, agranular; Id, dysgranular. RI, retroinsular field; T1‐3, temporal fields; SII, second somatic area; PK, prokoniocortical field. Abbreviations for thalamic nuclei, in boxes: LP, lateroposterior; MD, mediodorsal; SG, suprageniculate. Nuclei of pulvinar: Pla, anterior; Pli, inferior; Pll, lateral; Plm, medial Po, posterior. VB, ventrobasal complex; VMb, basal ventromedial. Right: composite summary of patterns of representation of body in second somatic area of monkey and in several surrounding areas that receive somatic afferent input.

A: from Burton and Jones 103; B: from Burton and Robinson 106
Figure 36. Figure 36.

A: construction of responses of a projection neuron of cuneate nucleus of a cat to brief mechanical stimuli delivered at various locations within its receptive field on contralateral forefoot (inset upper left); this test stimulus, T8, is shown on first trace lower left, and impulse histogram evoked by it on second trace. Scales are latency of response, distance of stimulated positions from tip of toes, and impulses per 2‐ms bin in response histogram. On reciprocal interpretation, construction shows distribution of population of cuneate neurons activated by a single stimulus delivered to center of receptive field, and variations in response intensity across population. B: repetition of experiment, but in this case each test stimulus is preceded by a conditioning stimulus delivered within receptive field, which produced excitation followed by afferent inhibition, traces 3 and 4, lower left. On reciprocal interpretation afferent inhibition has narrowed and sharpened distribution of discharging population.

From Jänig et al. 283
Figure 37. Figure 37.

Reconstructions (dashed lines) of populations of neurons of somatic sensory cortex of cat responding to each of 3 shearing mechanical stimuli delivered alone to points 15 mm apart on contralateral foreleg. They show shift of response population with shift of stimulus location, with overlap. Solid line plots population response when 3 stimuli are delivered simultaneously; it is unimodal, with greater response intensity in its center, the result of “funneling.”

From Gardner and Spencer 210
Figure 38. Figure 38.

A: linear subjective magnitude estimation by human subjects of intensities of mechanical stimuli delivered to glabrous skin of their contralateral forefingers. Points are means for eight healthy young adults, after normalization of their individual scales. Stimuli were step indentations of 600‐ms duration of probe tip 2 mm in diameter machined to a one‐third spherical surface. The 15 stimulus classes were separated by steps of equal amplitude, a range of 2,815 μm, and stimuli from those classes were delivered in a random order. B: linear stimulus‐response relation for slowly adapting (SA) myelinated afferent fiber innervating glabrous skin of monkey's finger. Stimuli as for psychophysical experiment in A, randomly varied over indentation range of 1,600 μm. Number of impulses evoked by each stimulus plotted as function of measured skin indentation for that stimulus. C: linear stimulus‐response relation for SA neuron of area 3b of unanesthetized monkey. Stimuli described above delivered to glabrous skin of contralateral hand; stimulus range 1,624 μm, divided into 15 classes separated by equal steps; stimuli from these classes were delivered in random order. Mean number of impulses evoked by 8–10 stimuli of each class is plotted as function of class amplitude.

B: from Mountcastle et al. 432; C: from V. B. Mountcastle, unpublished experiments
Figure 39. Figure 39.

Types of synaptic linkages serving afferent inhibition in synaptic transfer regions of lemniscal system. Input axons (1st order, 2nd order, etc.) may terminate on primary projection neurons: 1, on interneurons; 2, with axonal contacts on terminals of neighboring fiber; or on interneurons, 3, which possess polarizing synaptic contacts on adjacent projection neurons. Type 2 cells subserve presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms; type 3 cells are interneurons in postsynaptic inhibitory pathways; others not shown are in descending excitatory pathways. Both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibitory interneurons, as well as excitatory interneurons, may be activated by recurrent collaterals of projection neurons and via descending pathways from the forebrain.

From Mountcastle 420
Figure 40. Figure 40.

Spatial extents of excitatory and inhibitory peripheral receptive fields of 8 thalamocortical neurons of ventrobasal complex of anesthetized cats. Abscissa: normalized distance on skin of contralateral forepaw for which unit distance was taken as distance proximal from center of receptive field at which excitation had fallen to 20% of its maximum, at field center. Ordinate: excitation or inhibition as percentage of maximum at field center. Inhibition measured as reduction in response to a supramaximal test stimulus preceded 20–30 ms earlier by conditioning stimulus. All stimuli were gentle, brief jets of air delivered to hairy skin. Three principal features of afferent inhibition are illustrated: coincidence of excitatory and inhibitory field centers; difference in slopes of excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields; and pronounced surround inhibition. On reciprocal interpretation, graphs plot spatial distribution of neurons in ventrobasal complex excitated and inhibited by local peripheral stimulus. Vertical bars = 2 SE of means.

From Janig et al. 284
Figure 41. Figure 41.

Interaction of excitatory and inhibitory afferent drive on slowly adapting neuron of area 1 of postcentral gyrus of anesthetized macaque monkey, produced by stimuli delivered to its peripheral receptive field on contralateral forearm. Neuron was excited by mechanical stimuli delivered to field outlined on preaxial side of arm and inhibited by mechanical stimuli delivered anywhere within a large surrounding field; only dorsal halves of excitatory and inhibitory fields are shown on drawing at left. Graph at right plots impulse frequency vs. time during excitatory‐inhibitory interaction. Application of steady mechanical stimulus to excitatory field evoked high‐frequency onset transient discharge that declined toward a plateau until interrupted by application of mechanical stimulus to inhibitory receptive field. Upon removal of latter, excitatory sequence was repeated in response to continuing stimulus to excitatory field.

From Mountcastle and Powell 429
Figure 42. Figure 42.

Duration of afferent inhibition for neurons of somatic area I, studied in anesthetized cats. Inhibition measured as reduction in response to air‐jet test stimulus delivered to functional center of peripheral receptive field, produced by a conditioning air‐jet stimulus delivered either proximal or distal in receptive field. Observations on each neuron normalized with respect to maximal inhibition obtained for that neuron; means for 25 neurons displayed. A: mean number of impulses expected in response to excitatory stimulus alone, in each of 5‐ms bins indicated; expectation of an excitatory response is much shorter than is that of inhibition, as shown in B. B: time course of inhibition computed as deviation of observed response when C and T were delivered together (CT) from predicted algebraic summation of response to each of stimuli delivered alone. Vertical bars, SEM; filled circles, overlapping responses to test and conditioning stimuli; open circles, temporally isolated conditioning (C) and test (T) responses. Inhibition appears to increase simultaneously with excitation, and to last much longer.

From Laskin and Spencer 362
Figure 43. Figure 43.

Sensitivity of neuron of postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta to velocity and direction of moving cutaneous stimuli. Graph plots peak response at point of intersection of chords shown on drawing to the right, as functions of stimulus velocity and direction. Sensitivity to movements in proximal to distal direction increased with increasing velocities of stimulus movement.

From Whitsel et al. 625
Figure 44. Figure 44.

A: average psychometric function for groups of human and monkey subjects required to detect the presence of a 40‐Hz mechanical sinusoid stimulus delivered to glabrous skin of finger tip. Vertical lines = 2 × SEM. B: frequency‐threshold functions for groups of human and monkey subjects asked to detect presence of mechanical sinusoids of different frequencies, delivered to glabrous skin of finger tip. Vertical lines = 2 × SEM.

From Mountcastle et al. 424
Figure 45. Figure 45.

Psychometric functions for frequency discriminations made by 2 Macaca mulatta monkeys (left) and 2 human subjects (right), made when amplitude of comparison frequency was constant (dotted line) and equal in subjective intensity to standard, and when amplitude of comparison stimulus was intentionally varied above and below that of standard in its subjective intensity (solid lines).

LaMotte and Mountcastle 355
Figure 46. Figure 46.

Psychometric functions for amplitude discriminations made by 2 Macaca mulatta monkeys and 3 human subjects, at each of three standard amplitudes at 30 Hz.

From LaMotte and Mountcastle 355
Figure 47. Figure 47.

Replicas of impulse discharges of neuron in postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta, responding to mechanical sinusoids of 40 Hz and at different amplitudes (figures in μm) delivered to glabrous skin of contralateral hand. Each horizontal line replicates neural discharges during single stimulus; each group of lines represents successive responses to stimuli of identical amplitude. Each trace begins with onset of mechanical sinusoid. There is clear replication of frequency of stimulus in a periodicity code, which contrasts with the 1‐impulseper‐cycle code for peripheral rapidly adapting fibers, shown in Figs. 15 and 18 of the chapter on touch by Darian‐Smith, in this Handbook.

From Mountcastle et al. 433
Figure 48. Figure 48.

Expectation density (left) and renewal density (right) histograms for responses of neuron of postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta, linked to rapidly adapting afferents innervating glabrous skin of contralateral hand. Mechanical sinusoids (at 30 Hz) delivered at amplitudes indicated (in μm, at far right) for each pair of histograms. Histograms to left show strong replication of stimulus frequency, just apparent at 6 μm and clear at 13 μm. Monkey detection threshold at 30 Hz is 608 μm. Renewal density histogram is essentially a repetition of expectation density analysis after random shuffling of interval sequences to destroy temporal sequence. Results show importance of temporal order in which impulses occur for this particular neural code. Bin size: 2 ms at left; 375 μs at right.

From Mountcastle et al. 433
Figure 49. Figure 49.

Set of receiver operating‐characteristic curves for a human observer discriminating 40–Hz mechanical sinusoids from those of other frequencies, delivered to distal pad of right middle finger. Discriminations were made at about 15 dB above threshold; 200 trials for each curve. Inset, relation of index of detectability to differences in cycle lengths between comparison frequencies and 40 Hz.

From Mountcastle et al. 433
Figure 50. Figure 50.

A: psychophysical (large dots) and neural (small dots) SD values at different stimulus frequencies. Large dots with solid line, SD values of distribution of sensory events at different standard frequencies for one human observer as mechanical stimuli 20 dB above threshold were delivered to distal pad of right forefinger. Dotted line, calculated from SD values, shows the differences in cycle lengths between two stimuli that this observer would be able to discriminate in a forced‐choice experiment at level of P = 0.95 correct answer. Small dots, SD values for cycle histograms from 13 postcentral rapidly adapting neurons, at different frequencies, and at those intensities at which the values were smallest. B: relation of psychophysical and neural uncertainties, to stimulus cycle lengths at different frequencies, for mechanical sinusoids delivered to the glabrous skin of hand. Heavy line, relation of discriminable difference in cycle length (left) to cycle length of standard frequency, a Weber function. Small dots, relation of standard deviations of cycle histograms of postcentral neuronal discharges (left) to stimulus cycle length, which is analogous to coefficient of variation.

From Mountcastle, et al. 433
Figure 51. Figure 51.

Results obtained in combined psychophysical and electrophysiological experiment carried out in waking, behaving Macaca mulatta. Solid line, psychometric function, plotting percentage of correct detections the monkey made of mechanical sinusoids at 30 Hz, of different amplitudes, delivered to glabrous skin of a contralateral finger. Stimulus delivered to center of peripheral receptive field of rapidly adapting neuron in monkey's postcentral gyrus. Dashed lines, relative energy in neuronal signal at stimulus frequency (1st Har.) and at the IInd and IIIrd harmonics, obtained by Fourier analysis. Strength of cortical neuronal signal at stimulus frequency rose at equal rate with increase in likelihood of detection.

From V. B. Mountcastle, G. Carli, and R. H. LaMotte, unpublished experiments
Figure 52. Figure 52.

Illustrations of maps obtained in experiments of type illustrated in Fig. 25. They show variation in details of representations in areas 3b and 1 for 2 owl monkeys, left, and 2 squirrel monkeys, right.

From Merzenich et al. 403
Figure 53. Figure 53.

Reorganizations of hand representations in areas 3b and 1 of owl monkeys after section of medial nerve. A: location and normal maps for areas 3b and 1; two representations are nearly mirror images. Digits and palmar pads numbered in order; insular (I), hypothenar (H), thenar (T) pads; distal (d), middle (m), and proximal (p) phalanges. B: normal hand representations in detail. C: cortex normally related to median nerve shown by dots, depried of afferent input after nerve section. D: completed reorganization of maps several months after nerve section. Much of formerly deprived cortex is now activated by stimulation of dorsal surfaces of hand and digits (black). Palmar pads innervated by ulnar nerve have an increased cortical representation.

From Kaas et al. 322


Figure 1.

Dermatomal and somatotopic representations in gracile tract at lumbar and cervical levels, illustrating dorsal column “shuffle” for topography that occurs in the projection. Drawings to left show greatly increasing overlap in dermatomal projections. Drawings to right show results of electrophysiological experiments; they reveal somatotopic representation, with improvement of resolution in projection from lumbar to cervical levels. This is accompanied by a modality shuffle, described in text.

From Whitsel et al. 623


Figure 2.

Diagram of degree of modality convergence of primary afferents upon cells of origin of spinocervical tract in decerebrate (left column) and spinal (right column) cat. Difference is attributed to action of descending systems originating in brain stem that maintain in a dynamic way the modality specificities shown to left. That action is revealed by wide modality convergences that appear when descending influences are removed in spinal cat (right). HFT, HFG, and HFD: three subclasses of hair follicle afferents.

From Brown 85


Figure 3.

A: camera lucida reconstruction of 2 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn, closely adjacent in rostrocaudal direction, stained by intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase. Dendrites of the 2 cells are closely entwined. Peripheral receptive field of each neuron is shown directly below; that of neuron to left is completely overlapped by that of neuron to right. B: similar reconstructions of 2 SCT cells closely adjacent in mediolateral direction. Somata are only 135 μm apart, but their dendrites are completely separate and their peripheral receptive fields do not overlap. These arrangements create rostrocaudal columnar organization of dorsal horn neurons from which axons of SCT arise.

From Brown et al. 96


Figure 4.

A: positions within dorsal horn in a 2.5‐mm length of L7 spinal segment of cat at which extracellular recordings were made from 53 different neurons of origin of spinocervical tract (SCT) fibers. Observations made in grid of microelectrode penetrations at 250‐μm intervals. Band of cells centers on Rexed's lamina IV. B: horizontal distribution of SCT neurons from another experiment, showing estimated positions of 60 neurons identified by extracellular recording in an experiment similar to that of A. C: plan view of opposite side of cord in same animal as in B, in which 60 SCT neurons were identified after retrograde staining with horseradish peroxidase.

A: from Brown et al. 92; B, C: from Brown et al. 89


Figure 5.

Left: figurine map showing receptive fields of 60 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn identified in plan plot of Fig. 4B. There is an organization into longitudinal columns of neurons; receptive fields of those in a single column overlap greatly. As one moves in the transverse direction the receptive fields of neurons encountered jump abruptly from one location to another on body surface. Right: somatotopic schema of representation of hindleg in dorsal horn SCT cells at lumbosacral level of cat's spinal cord. Representation is homotopic, except that there is none for glabrous skin of pad.

From Brown et al. 89


Figure 6.

Left: figurine map showing receptive fields of 60 spinocervical tract (SCT) neurons of dorsal horn identified in plan plot of Fig. 4B. There is an organization into longitudinal columns of neurons; receptive fields of those in a single column overlap greatly. As one moves in the transverse direction the receptive fields of neurons encountered jump abruptly from one location to another on body surface. Right: somatotopic schema of representation of hindleg in dorsal horn SCT cells at lumbosacral level of cat's spinal cord. Representation is homotopic, except that there is none for glabrous skin of pad.

From Brown et al. 89


Figure 7.

Schematic diagram of spinocervicothalamic (SC‐LC) and the spinomedullothalamic system (SM‐Z) in cat, described in text. C, T, L: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions, respectively, of spinal cord; VPL, ventrobasal complex of thalamus; POm, medial portion of posterior nuclear group of thalamus; CL, centrolateral nucleus of thalamus; C and G, relative positions of cuneate and gracile nuclei; vertical dashed line, midline; Cb, cerebellum.

From Willis and Coggleshall 630


Figure 8.

Schematic representation of dorsal column nuclei and spinal trigeminal nucleus of cat, made from a reconstruction of serial sections. TRIG, spinal trigeminal nucleus; CUN, cuneate nucleus; EX CUN, external cuneate nucleus; G, gracile nucleus. Nuclei × and y are not shown.

Figure courtesy of R. W. Dykes


Figure 9.

Two selected transverse sections through medulla of cat at level of dorsal column nuclear complex. Left: projections of 4 dorsal roots, determined in antegrade tracer experiment by Keller and Hand 330. Right: cartoon of representation of body surfaces of cat within DCN and trigeminal nucleus, composed by Hand from Kruger et al. 348 and from Hand 244. Thus in efferent projection from these nuclei into medial lemniscus to ventrobasal complex of thalamus, representation of body inverts and that of head reverses and inverts, to compose distorted but normal image of representation at thalamic level.



Figure 10.

Results of experiment in which microelectrode penetrations were made in horizontal plane, passing from medial to lateral through dorsal column nuclear (DCN) complex of a cat. Receptive fields and modality properties of single neurons and small clusters of neurons of DCN were determined at 50‐μm intervals. Symbols: black, activation by stimulation of deep tissues; diagonal lines, cutaneous; cross‐hatching, Pacinian; white, not identified. Letters beside each reconstruction indicate further modality subdivisions: S, slowly adapting; R, rapidly adapting; L, low velocity; P, Pacinian; T, “tap”. G, gracile nucleus; C, cuneate nucleus; RC, rostral part of cuneate nucleus; EC, external nucleus; ST, spinal trigeminal nucleus. Results show modular organization of DCN complex.

From Dykes, et al. 168


Figure 11.

Figurine map showing general pattern of representation of body in single plane of ventrobasal complex of thalamus of monkey, Macaca mulatta, obtained in a gross electrode, evoked‐potential experiment under deep barbiturate anesthesia. Inset: diagram of thalamus in frontal plane studied; dots, points at which electrical activity was evoked by tactile stimulation of body surface; each dot correlates to an appropriately located figurine drawing. Vertical electrode penetrations made at 0.5‐mm intervals in mediolateral direction; recording points 0.5 mm apart in vertical dimension. VBex and VBarc, external and arcuate components of ventrobasal complex; M, mediodorsal nucleus; CM, centre médian; PF, parafascicular nucleus; HP, habenulopeduncular tract; GLD, lateral geniculate nucleus.

From Mountcastle and Henneman 423


Figure 12.

Results of a microelectrode single‐neuron mapping study of ventrobasal complex of a cynomolgus monkey, made under barbiturate anesthesia. Receptive fields of single neurons and of small neuron clusters were determined at about 100‐μm intervals as electrodes were passed in an oblique plane from anterolateral to posteromedial, across ventrobasal complex. They reveal lamellar and modular organization of ventrobasal complex described in text. VPLc and VPLm, the 2 components of ventrobasal complex. Tracks 6A and 7A were made 250 μm dorsal to tracks 6 and 7. Clear or stippled, regions in which neurons and neuron clusters were activated by cutaneous stimuli; hatching, regions activated by stimulation of deep tissues. Bars, locations at which single neurons are studied.

From Jones and Friedman 310


Figure 13.

Results of a microelectrode single‐neuron study of ventrobasal complex of a cynomolgus monkey, made under deep barbiturate anesthesia. Conventions and labeling as for experiment of Fig. 12, except that here vertical penetrations were made from above in same parasagittal plane, indicated by the upper right inset. Lower right inset, results of similar experiment in which vertical penetrations were made from above, all in a single frontal plane.

From Jones and Friedman 310


Figure 14.

Schematic diagram showing on horizontal and frontal planes the lamellar somatotopic representation of contralateral body in ventrobasal complex. Drawings indicate a nearly complete separation of zones for cutaneous and deep modalities. Other evidence, discussed in text, indicates that modules for different modalities are to a certain extent interdigitated in ventrobasal complex.

From Jones and Friedman 310


Figure 15.

Outline drawings (above) of thalamic nuclear configurations in histological sections through posterior third of ventrobasal complex of macaque monkey, showing reconstructions of three microelectrode penetrations (P1, P2, P3) and results obtained in them. Open and solid circles, positions at which single neurons studied were activated by stimulation of deep tissues or of skin, respectively. Insets, locations on body of peripheral receptive fields, correlated with modality; here observations on single neurons and small clusters of neurons are combined. Results indicate modular organization of ventrobasal complex described in text, with occasional mixed sequences of modality, and that deep and cutaneous modules are partially interdigitated, not completely sequestered in separate parts of complex. CL, centrolateral nucleus; CM, centre médian; GMM, magnocellular medial geniculate; GMP, principal nucleus, medial geniculate; ID, laterodorsal nucleus; LP, lateroposterior nucleus; MD, mediodorsal nucleus; PF, parafascicular nucleus; PUL, pulvinar; SG, suprageniculate nucleus; VPL, external portion of ventrobasal complex.

From Poggio and Mountcastle 468


Figure 16.

Examples of peripheral receptive fields of a sample of neurons studied in posterior nuclear group of thalamus of lightly anesthetized cats. Five neurons of this sample were activated by light mechanical stimulation of skin, from very large bilateral receptive fields. Two were responsive only to noxious stimulation, while one (48 cc) responded to either form of stimulation in large but different receptive fields. Ipsilateral side of body is to right in drawings. Stippled: receptive fields of units driven by mechanical stimuli; diagonal stripes: receptive fields of units driven by noxious stimuli.

From Poggio and Mountcastle 467


Figure 17.

Figurine map showing general representation of body surface in postcentral gyrus, as determined with slow‐wave, evoked‐potential method. Each drawing shows body areas within which light mechanical stimulation evoked responses at cortical position of drawing. Black and shading, different intensities of responses. Dashed line at left, depth of central sulcus, so that posterior bank of the central sulcus is turned forward into plane of lateral surface of hemisphere. Similarly, medial wall of the hemisphere and the superior bank of cingular fissure are swung upward into same plane. Upper dashed line, depth of cingular sulcus.

From Woolsey 644


Figure 18.

Diagrams of cortices of rat, rabbit, cat, and rhesus monkey showing locations and general plans of organization of precentral motor (MI), supplementary motor (MII), postcentral sensory (SI), and second somatic (SII) areas. Relations to auditory and visual areas are shown, except for monkey auditory area, which lies hidden on lower bank of Sylvian fissure. For rabbit, cat, and monkey the medial walls of hemispheres are swung upward in drawings to occupy same planes as lateral surfaces.

From Woolsey 644


Figure 19.

Diagram of the extent of areas 3b, 1, and 2 as seen in an external view of lateral surface of cerebral hemisphere of Macaca mulatta; reconstructed from study of serial sections. Almost all of 3b and all of 3a are hidden within the central fissure. A, arcuate sulcus; CS, central sulcus; IP, intraparietal sulcus; L, lunate sulcus; P, principal sulcus; PCS, postcentral sulcus; PR, superior precental sulcus; S, Sylvian fissure; SC, anterior subcentral sulcus; ST, superior temporal sulcus.

From Powell and Mountcastle 473


Figure 20.

Lower two rows show by common symbols the locations of retrogradely labeled rods of cells in ventrobasal complex (VPLc + VPM) of a cynomolgus monkey, after local cortical injections of horseradish peroxidase. Sites of injection of label into postcentral gyrus are shown in outline drawing of right hemisphere, next above. Upper row, peripheral receptive fields of clusters of neurons at injection sites, determined before injection.

From Jones et al. 311


Figure 21.

Schematic diagram showing, on sagittal sections, general pattern of input‐output connections of ventrobasal complex and adjacent nuclei, in cynomolgus monkeys. This drawing presents the “core‐shell” hypothesis, which is based on idea that neurons of cutaneous and deep classes are completely segregated in thalamus and thus in their cortical projections. Alternative view that differs slightly is discussed in text: namely, that while there is a degree of this segregation, the modular sets of slowly and quickly adapting cutaneous neurons and of Pacinian neurons, and the deep modalities, are to a certain extent inter‐digitated in ventrobasal complex, as they are in postcentral gyrus.

From Jones and Friedman 310


Figure 22.

Diagrams to illustrate cortical connections of sensory and motor cortices in monkeys. Dashed line for connection on left indicates a suggested but still uncertain projection from area 1 to area 3b; otherwise, area 3b is a purely feed‐forward unit. At right: open circles, and solid arrowheads, unidirectional projections; solid circles and lines with double arrowheads, reciprocal connections.



Figure 23.

Three‐dimensional model of relation between proliferative layer around ventricular surface of neural tube (VZ) and developing cortical plate (CP), in monkeys.

Model shows that each small area of cortex is generated from a correspondingly small area in proliferative zone. Neurons pass from latter to former along elongated processes of small group of glial guide cells. All neurons produced at a given site in ventricular germinal zone migrate along same glial shafts, and thus reach same cortical location, where they are arranged in vertical units, the ontogenetic columns aî … nî within cortical plate. Thus tangential relations of proliferative units a …n are reproduced in the same xy relations in the aî … nî ontogenetic units in cortex: a topologically ordered relation is maintained between the two in spite of cortical enlargement and infolding. Straight vertical dashed line, mismatch that would occur if migrating neurons took shortest path and did not follow their glial guide cells. Thus tangential position of each cortical neuron is determined by relative position of its precursor cell in proliferative zone. Position of each cortical cell in depth is determined by time of its generation and speed of migration; cortex is constructed in time from inside to outside. From Rakic 485


Figure 24.

How results of nerve regeneration experiments provide evidence for columnar organization of somatic cortex; estimate of size of smallest identifiable functional columnar element. Left: results of an experiment in which a recording microelectrode passed nearly parallel to surface of cortex, through a region of neurons of same cutaneous modality. Adjacent columns are related to sequentially adjoining and overlapping peripheral receptive fields and might thus pass unnoticed. Right: the results obtained in a similar experiment after section and resuture of median nerve, with misdirection of the reinnervating nerve bundles. Sudden jumps of receptive‐field locations at intervals of about 40–60 μm reveal cortical minicolumns.

From Kaas et al. 324


Figure 25.

Upper left: drawing of left hemisphere of brain of owl monkey, showing location of representations of hand in ares 3b and 1 of postcentral gyrus. Upper and lower right: illustrations of how detailed maps are constructed from results of microelectrode mapping experiments. Drawings are of hand area of 3b; here rostral is toward lower edge of drawings, lateral to right. Cutaneous receptive fields on various parts of hand, lower center, were mapped for clusters of neurons encountered in the 172 penetration sites shown in drawing at upper right, where symbols represent centers of receptive fields encountered. Stars, penetrations in which receptive fields were on dorsal surfaces of hand. Boundaries between areas of representation for different skin locations were made by halving distance between adjacent penetrations with different receptive fields. D1‐D5: digits 1–5; P, M, D: proximal, middle and distal phalanges, glabrous surface; P1, P2, P3, P4: 4 pads at bases of digits; P1: insular pads in center of palm; PTH, PH: thenar and hypothenar eminences; H, dorsal surface; W; wrist; F, face.

From Merzenich et al. 401


Figure 26.

Somatotopic organization of representations of body surface in contralateral areas 3b and 1 of cynomolgus macaque monkey. Map determined by method of cluster recording and multiple microelectrode penetrations illustrated in Fig. 28. Left: representations shown on dorsolateral view of left hemisphere. Right: representations as they appear expanded and unfolded, with anterior bank of postcentral gyrus turned forward into plane of drawing. Receptive‐field regions outlined within drawing; heavy lines enclose areas 3b and 1, dotted line, position of central sulcus, and vertical dashed line near top, region along medial wall where portions of representation in areas 3b and 1 are contained in cortex of medial wall of hemisphere. Representation of individual digits of hand and foot outlined and numbered D1‐D5; shaded areas, zones of representation of hairy skin of dorsal surfaces of digits. Summary map constructed from maps obtained in several different animals in which more than one region was mapped in areas 3b and 1; individual maps were combined, based on their overlap.

From Nelson et al. 442


Figure 27.

Detailed evidence that there are 3 representations of digits in somatic sensory cortex of macaque monkeys, 1 each in areas 3b, 1, and 2. A: 3 sets of receptive‐field drawings on outlines of hand show progression, reversal, and regression of fields from tips of fingers toward palm and again out to finger tips as recording sites are moved from anterior edge of 3b toward and across its junction with area 1, and then toward posterior edge of area 1. B: similar evidence for reversals of representations of fingers as recording sites are moved in a similar way across areas 1 and 2. These mirror‐image reversals at the 3b‐1 and 1–2 borders are best evidence for multiple representation hypothesis.

From Kaas et al. 323


Figure 28.

General pattern of representation of deep structures of body in area 2 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys. Sequence from medial to lateral is similar to that of areas 3b and 1, anteriorly. Circles, locations of penetrations in which no neurons drivable by somatic stimuli were observed in these anesthetized animals; these locations were probably in area 5.

From Merzenich et al. 400


Figure 29.

Results of receptive‐field study of neuron of area 3b of postcentral gyrus of lightly anesthetized Macaca mulatta showing gradations in intensity of response to stimuli delivered at different positions in field. Receptive field (right) was determined by light mechanical stimulation of skin. Brief electrical stimuli were delivered at points marked by numerals via small electrodes thrust in skin. Intensity of response falls from center toward each edge of field as latency increases (solid line) and probability of response drops (dashed lines). Electrical stimulation of skin at points 3 and 4 also evoked responses, even though they are outside field determined with physiological stimuli. This wide fringe is discussed in text.

From Mountcastle and Powell 429


Figure 30.

Plot in log‐log coordinates of receptive‐field areas for different portions of body surface, in areas 3b and 1 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys.

From Sur et al. 543


Figure 31.

Degree of overlap of cutaneous receptive fields in areas 3b and 1 of somatic sensory cortex of owl monkeys, plotted against distance between 2 neurons of each pair in tangential dimension of cortex. For fitted straight line, r = 0.79.

From Sur et al. 543


Figure 32.

Experiment showing interdigitation of modules of cortex for slowly and rapidly adapting neurons in area 3b of owl monkey; digits 1–5 are represented in order from lateral to media. A: peristimulus time histograms of activity evoked in neuron of SA type (upper), in one of RA type (middle), and by 600‐μm step indentation of skin (bottom). B: area 3b of owl monkey. C: sites of microelectrode penetrations within and around digit 4 representation in area 3b. Closed circles, penetrations with SA neurons; open circles, penetrations with RA neurons. Blood vessels outlined on surface of cortex. D: representation of 2 cutaneous modalities for digit 4, obtained from penetrations shown in C, showing regions for tip, and for distal, middle, and proximal phalanges. This supports idea of an intermittently recursive mapping for modalities within topographic pattern.

From Sur et al. 546


Figure 33.

Results of microelectrode mapping experiment carried out on forelimb region of first somatic area of anesthetized cat. Above right: region studied shown on drawing of dorsal view of cat brain. Receptive fields and modality types determined in each penetration by recording from small clusters of neurons at depths of 500–1,000 μm below cortical surface. Open triangles, deep; open circles, rapidly adapting; closed circles, slowly adapting cutaneous modalities. Results show modality segregation between areas 3a and 3b, and interdigitated regions for RA and SA cutaneous modalities within 3b.

From Sretavan and Dykes 532


Figure 34.

Schematic diagram illustrating concept of Whitsel et al. that postcentral map of hindleg of squirrel monkey is generated by sorting of afferents of different modality types to different spinal pathways that project in a differential but overlapping manner upon postcentral gyrus, where only a single map is thought to exist. Sorted, rapidly adapting, cutaneous afferents of dorsal columns project via central core of ventrobasal complex‐heavily to distal hindlimb region of cortex, lightly to areas for proximal hindlimb. Afferents from muscle and joints, together with SA cutaneous afferents, after sorting and relay project via dorsolateral columns to border zones of ventrobasal complex and from thence predominantly to areas 3b and 1‐heavily to regions for proximal, lightly to those for distal hindlimb.

From Whitsel et al. 621


Figure 35.

Inset in figure at right: lateral surface of monkey brain, with Sylvian fissure opened and expanded to reveal cortex buried within it; it is the key to the two larger drawings. Left: drawing summarizing studies of cytoarchitecture and sources of thalamic projections to cortex within Sylvian fissure. Cortical areas: 1, 2–3, 7. Auditory field: Al, first; Pa, posterolateral; RL, rostrolateral; Pi, parainsular. Insular fields: Ig, granular; la, agranular; Id, dysgranular. RI, retroinsular field; T1‐3, temporal fields; SII, second somatic area; PK, prokoniocortical field. Abbreviations for thalamic nuclei, in boxes: LP, lateroposterior; MD, mediodorsal; SG, suprageniculate. Nuclei of pulvinar: Pla, anterior; Pli, inferior; Pll, lateral; Plm, medial Po, posterior. VB, ventrobasal complex; VMb, basal ventromedial. Right: composite summary of patterns of representation of body in second somatic area of monkey and in several surrounding areas that receive somatic afferent input.

A: from Burton and Jones 103; B: from Burton and Robinson 106


Figure 36.

A: construction of responses of a projection neuron of cuneate nucleus of a cat to brief mechanical stimuli delivered at various locations within its receptive field on contralateral forefoot (inset upper left); this test stimulus, T8, is shown on first trace lower left, and impulse histogram evoked by it on second trace. Scales are latency of response, distance of stimulated positions from tip of toes, and impulses per 2‐ms bin in response histogram. On reciprocal interpretation, construction shows distribution of population of cuneate neurons activated by a single stimulus delivered to center of receptive field, and variations in response intensity across population. B: repetition of experiment, but in this case each test stimulus is preceded by a conditioning stimulus delivered within receptive field, which produced excitation followed by afferent inhibition, traces 3 and 4, lower left. On reciprocal interpretation afferent inhibition has narrowed and sharpened distribution of discharging population.

From Jänig et al. 283


Figure 37.

Reconstructions (dashed lines) of populations of neurons of somatic sensory cortex of cat responding to each of 3 shearing mechanical stimuli delivered alone to points 15 mm apart on contralateral foreleg. They show shift of response population with shift of stimulus location, with overlap. Solid line plots population response when 3 stimuli are delivered simultaneously; it is unimodal, with greater response intensity in its center, the result of “funneling.”

From Gardner and Spencer 210


Figure 38.

A: linear subjective magnitude estimation by human subjects of intensities of mechanical stimuli delivered to glabrous skin of their contralateral forefingers. Points are means for eight healthy young adults, after normalization of their individual scales. Stimuli were step indentations of 600‐ms duration of probe tip 2 mm in diameter machined to a one‐third spherical surface. The 15 stimulus classes were separated by steps of equal amplitude, a range of 2,815 μm, and stimuli from those classes were delivered in a random order. B: linear stimulus‐response relation for slowly adapting (SA) myelinated afferent fiber innervating glabrous skin of monkey's finger. Stimuli as for psychophysical experiment in A, randomly varied over indentation range of 1,600 μm. Number of impulses evoked by each stimulus plotted as function of measured skin indentation for that stimulus. C: linear stimulus‐response relation for SA neuron of area 3b of unanesthetized monkey. Stimuli described above delivered to glabrous skin of contralateral hand; stimulus range 1,624 μm, divided into 15 classes separated by equal steps; stimuli from these classes were delivered in random order. Mean number of impulses evoked by 8–10 stimuli of each class is plotted as function of class amplitude.

B: from Mountcastle et al. 432; C: from V. B. Mountcastle, unpublished experiments


Figure 39.

Types of synaptic linkages serving afferent inhibition in synaptic transfer regions of lemniscal system. Input axons (1st order, 2nd order, etc.) may terminate on primary projection neurons: 1, on interneurons; 2, with axonal contacts on terminals of neighboring fiber; or on interneurons, 3, which possess polarizing synaptic contacts on adjacent projection neurons. Type 2 cells subserve presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms; type 3 cells are interneurons in postsynaptic inhibitory pathways; others not shown are in descending excitatory pathways. Both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibitory interneurons, as well as excitatory interneurons, may be activated by recurrent collaterals of projection neurons and via descending pathways from the forebrain.

From Mountcastle 420


Figure 40.

Spatial extents of excitatory and inhibitory peripheral receptive fields of 8 thalamocortical neurons of ventrobasal complex of anesthetized cats. Abscissa: normalized distance on skin of contralateral forepaw for which unit distance was taken as distance proximal from center of receptive field at which excitation had fallen to 20% of its maximum, at field center. Ordinate: excitation or inhibition as percentage of maximum at field center. Inhibition measured as reduction in response to a supramaximal test stimulus preceded 20–30 ms earlier by conditioning stimulus. All stimuli were gentle, brief jets of air delivered to hairy skin. Three principal features of afferent inhibition are illustrated: coincidence of excitatory and inhibitory field centers; difference in slopes of excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields; and pronounced surround inhibition. On reciprocal interpretation, graphs plot spatial distribution of neurons in ventrobasal complex excitated and inhibited by local peripheral stimulus. Vertical bars = 2 SE of means.

From Janig et al. 284


Figure 41.

Interaction of excitatory and inhibitory afferent drive on slowly adapting neuron of area 1 of postcentral gyrus of anesthetized macaque monkey, produced by stimuli delivered to its peripheral receptive field on contralateral forearm. Neuron was excited by mechanical stimuli delivered to field outlined on preaxial side of arm and inhibited by mechanical stimuli delivered anywhere within a large surrounding field; only dorsal halves of excitatory and inhibitory fields are shown on drawing at left. Graph at right plots impulse frequency vs. time during excitatory‐inhibitory interaction. Application of steady mechanical stimulus to excitatory field evoked high‐frequency onset transient discharge that declined toward a plateau until interrupted by application of mechanical stimulus to inhibitory receptive field. Upon removal of latter, excitatory sequence was repeated in response to continuing stimulus to excitatory field.

From Mountcastle and Powell 429


Figure 42.

Duration of afferent inhibition for neurons of somatic area I, studied in anesthetized cats. Inhibition measured as reduction in response to air‐jet test stimulus delivered to functional center of peripheral receptive field, produced by a conditioning air‐jet stimulus delivered either proximal or distal in receptive field. Observations on each neuron normalized with respect to maximal inhibition obtained for that neuron; means for 25 neurons displayed. A: mean number of impulses expected in response to excitatory stimulus alone, in each of 5‐ms bins indicated; expectation of an excitatory response is much shorter than is that of inhibition, as shown in B. B: time course of inhibition computed as deviation of observed response when C and T were delivered together (CT) from predicted algebraic summation of response to each of stimuli delivered alone. Vertical bars, SEM; filled circles, overlapping responses to test and conditioning stimuli; open circles, temporally isolated conditioning (C) and test (T) responses. Inhibition appears to increase simultaneously with excitation, and to last much longer.

From Laskin and Spencer 362


Figure 43.

Sensitivity of neuron of postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta to velocity and direction of moving cutaneous stimuli. Graph plots peak response at point of intersection of chords shown on drawing to the right, as functions of stimulus velocity and direction. Sensitivity to movements in proximal to distal direction increased with increasing velocities of stimulus movement.

From Whitsel et al. 625


Figure 44.

A: average psychometric function for groups of human and monkey subjects required to detect the presence of a 40‐Hz mechanical sinusoid stimulus delivered to glabrous skin of finger tip. Vertical lines = 2 × SEM. B: frequency‐threshold functions for groups of human and monkey subjects asked to detect presence of mechanical sinusoids of different frequencies, delivered to glabrous skin of finger tip. Vertical lines = 2 × SEM.

From Mountcastle et al. 424


Figure 45.

Psychometric functions for frequency discriminations made by 2 Macaca mulatta monkeys (left) and 2 human subjects (right), made when amplitude of comparison frequency was constant (dotted line) and equal in subjective intensity to standard, and when amplitude of comparison stimulus was intentionally varied above and below that of standard in its subjective intensity (solid lines).

LaMotte and Mountcastle 355


Figure 46.

Psychometric functions for amplitude discriminations made by 2 Macaca mulatta monkeys and 3 human subjects, at each of three standard amplitudes at 30 Hz.

From LaMotte and Mountcastle 355


Figure 47.

Replicas of impulse discharges of neuron in postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta, responding to mechanical sinusoids of 40 Hz and at different amplitudes (figures in μm) delivered to glabrous skin of contralateral hand. Each horizontal line replicates neural discharges during single stimulus; each group of lines represents successive responses to stimuli of identical amplitude. Each trace begins with onset of mechanical sinusoid. There is clear replication of frequency of stimulus in a periodicity code, which contrasts with the 1‐impulseper‐cycle code for peripheral rapidly adapting fibers, shown in Figs. 15 and 18 of the chapter on touch by Darian‐Smith, in this Handbook.

From Mountcastle et al. 433


Figure 48.

Expectation density (left) and renewal density (right) histograms for responses of neuron of postcentral gyrus of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca mulatta, linked to rapidly adapting afferents innervating glabrous skin of contralateral hand. Mechanical sinusoids (at 30 Hz) delivered at amplitudes indicated (in μm, at far right) for each pair of histograms. Histograms to left show strong replication of stimulus frequency, just apparent at 6 μm and clear at 13 μm. Monkey detection threshold at 30 Hz is 608 μm. Renewal density histogram is essentially a repetition of expectation density analysis after random shuffling of interval sequences to destroy temporal sequence. Results show importance of temporal order in which impulses occur for this particular neural code. Bin size: 2 ms at left; 375 μs at right.

From Mountcastle et al. 433


Figure 49.

Set of receiver operating‐characteristic curves for a human observer discriminating 40–Hz mechanical sinusoids from those of other frequencies, delivered to distal pad of right middle finger. Discriminations were made at about 15 dB above threshold; 200 trials for each curve. Inset, relation of index of detectability to differences in cycle lengths between comparison frequencies and 40 Hz.

From Mountcastle et al. 433


Figure 50.

A: psychophysical (large dots) and neural (small dots) SD values at different stimulus frequencies. Large dots with solid line, SD values of distribution of sensory events at different standard frequencies for one human observer as mechanical stimuli 20 dB above threshold were delivered to distal pad of right forefinger. Dotted line, calculated from SD values, shows the differences in cycle lengths between two stimuli that this observer would be able to discriminate in a forced‐choice experiment at level of P = 0.95 correct answer. Small dots, SD values for cycle histograms from 13 postcentral rapidly adapting neurons, at different frequencies, and at those intensities at which the values were smallest. B: relation of psychophysical and neural uncertainties, to stimulus cycle lengths at different frequencies, for mechanical sinusoids delivered to the glabrous skin of hand. Heavy line, relation of discriminable difference in cycle length (left) to cycle length of standard frequency, a Weber function. Small dots, relation of standard deviations of cycle histograms of postcentral neuronal discharges (left) to stimulus cycle length, which is analogous to coefficient of variation.

From Mountcastle, et al. 433


Figure 51.

Results obtained in combined psychophysical and electrophysiological experiment carried out in waking, behaving Macaca mulatta. Solid line, psychometric function, plotting percentage of correct detections the monkey made of mechanical sinusoids at 30 Hz, of different amplitudes, delivered to glabrous skin of a contralateral finger. Stimulus delivered to center of peripheral receptive field of rapidly adapting neuron in monkey's postcentral gyrus. Dashed lines, relative energy in neuronal signal at stimulus frequency (1st Har.) and at the IInd and IIIrd harmonics, obtained by Fourier analysis. Strength of cortical neuronal signal at stimulus frequency rose at equal rate with increase in likelihood of detection.

From V. B. Mountcastle, G. Carli, and R. H. LaMotte, unpublished experiments


Figure 52.

Illustrations of maps obtained in experiments of type illustrated in Fig. 25. They show variation in details of representations in areas 3b and 1 for 2 owl monkeys, left, and 2 squirrel monkeys, right.

From Merzenich et al. 403


Figure 53.

Reorganizations of hand representations in areas 3b and 1 of owl monkeys after section of medial nerve. A: location and normal maps for areas 3b and 1; two representations are nearly mirror images. Digits and palmar pads numbered in order; insular (I), hypothenar (H), thenar (T) pads; distal (d), middle (m), and proximal (p) phalanges. B: normal hand representations in detail. C: cortex normally related to median nerve shown by dots, depried of afferent input after nerve section. D: completed reorganization of maps several months after nerve section. Much of formerly deprived cortex is now activated by stimulation of dorsal surfaces of hand and digits (black). Palmar pads innervated by ulnar nerve have an increased cortical representation.

From Kaas et al. 322
References
 1. Adrian, E. D. Double representation of the feet in the sensory cortex of the cat. J. Physiol. London 98: 16–18, 1940.
 2. Adrian, E. D. Afferent discharges to the cerebral cortex from peripheral sense organs. J. Physiol. London 100: 159–191, 1941.
 3. Albe‐fessard, D., J. Boivie, G. Grant, and A. Levante. Labelling of cells in the medulla oblongata and the spinal cord of the monkey after injections of horseradish peroxidase in the thalamus. Neurosci. Lett. 1: 75–80, 1975.
 4. Albe‐fessard, D., A. Levante, and Y. Lamour. Origin of spinothalamic tract in monkeys. Brain Res. 65: 503–509, 1974.
 5. Albe‐fessard, D., and J. Liebeskind. Origine des messages somato‐sensitifs activant les cellules du cortex moteur chez le singe. Exp. Brain Res. 1: 127–146, 1966.
 6. Andersen, P., S. A. Andersson, and S. Landgren. Some properties of the thalamic relay cells in the spino‐cervicolemniscal path. Acta Physiol. Scand. 68: 72–83, 1966.
 7. Andersen, P., C. McC. Brooks, J. C. Eccles, and T. A. Sears. The ventrobasal nucleus of the thalamus: potential fields, synaptic transmission and excitability of both presynaptic and postsynaptic elements. J. Physiol. London 174: 348–369, 1964.
 8. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, T. Oshima, and R. F. Schmidt. Mechanisms of synaptic transmission in the cuneate nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 27: 1096–1116, 1964.
 9. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, and R. F. Schmidt. Presynaptic inhibition in the cuneate nucleus. Nature London 194: 743–747, 1962.
 10. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, R. F. Schmidt, and T. Yokota. Slow potential waves produced in the cuneate nucleus by cutaneous volleys and by cortical stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 27: 78–91, 1964.
 11. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, R. F. Schmidt, and T. Yokota. Depolarization of presynaptic fibers in the cuneate nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 27: 92–106, 1964.
 12. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, R. F. Schmidt, and T. Yokota. Identification of relay cells and interneurons in the cuneate nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 27: 1080–1095, 1964.
 13. Andersen, P., J. C. Eccles, and T. A. Sears. The ventrobasal complex of the thalamus: types of cells, their responses and their functional organization. J. Physiol. London 174: 370–399, 1964.
 14. Andersen, P., B. Etholm, and G. Gordon. Presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition elicited in the cat's dorsal column nuclei by mechanical stimulation of skin. J. Physiol. London 210: 433–455, 1970.
 15. Andersen, P., L. Gjerstad, and E. Pasztor. Effects of cooling on inhibitory processes in the cuneate nucleus. Acta Physiol. Scand. 84: 448–461, 1972.
 16. Andersen, P., K. Jung, and O. Sveen. Cortico‐thalamic facilitation of somatosensory impulses. Nature London 214: 1011–1012, 1967.
 17. Andersen, P., and T. A. Sears. The role of inhibition in the phasing of spontaneous thalamo‐cortical discharge. J. Physiol. London 173: 459–480, 1964.
 18. Andersson, S. A., N. Kerstin, and U. Norrsell. Spinal pathways projecting to the cerebral first somatosensory area in the monkey. J. Physiol. London 225: 589–597, 1972.
 19. Andersson, S. A., and P. E. Leissner. Does the spinocervical pathway exist? Brain Res. 98: 359–363, 1975.
 20. Andersson, S. A., K. Norrsell, and U. Norrsell. Spinal pathways projecting to the cerebral somatosensory area in the monkey. J. Physiol. London 225: 589–597, 1972.
 21. Andres‐trelles, F., C. M. Cowan, and M. A. Simmonds. The negative potential wave evoked in cuneate nucleus by stimulation of afferent pathways: its origins and susceptibility to inhibition. J. Physiol. London 258: 173–186, 1976.
 22. Angaut‐Petit, D. The dorsal column system: I. Existence of long ascending postsynaptic fibres in the cat's fasciculus gracilis. Exp. Brain Res. 22: 457–470, 1975.
 23. Angaut‐petit, D. The dorsal column system: II. Functional properties and bulbar relay of the postsynaptic fibres of the cat's fasciculus gracilis. Exp. Brain Res. 22: 471–493, 1975.
 24. Angel, A. Evidence for cortical inhibition of transmission at the thalamic sensory relay nucleus in the rat. J. Physiol. London 169: 108–109, 1963.
 25. Applebaum, A. E., J. E. Beall, R. D. Foreman, and W. D. Willis. Organization and receptive fields of primate spinothalamic tract neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 572–586, 1975.
 26. Applebaum, A. E., R. B. Leonard, D. R. Kenshalo, JR., R. F. Martin, and W. D. Willis. Nuclei in which functionally identified spinothalamic tract neurons terminate. J. Comp. Neurol. 188: 575–585, 1979.
 27. Armstrong, D. M., and R. F. Schild. Location in the spinal cord of neurons projecting directly to the inferior olive in the cat. In: The Inferior Olivary Nucleus: Anatomy and Physiology, edited by J. Courville, C. de Montigny, and Y. Lamarre. New York: Raven, 1980, p. 125–143.
 28. Armstrong‐james, M. The functional status and columnar organization of single cells responding to cutaneous stimulation in neonatal rat somatosensory cortex S‐1. J. Physiol. London 246: 501–538, 1975.
 29. Asanuma, C., W. T. Thach, and E. G. Jones. Cytoarchitectonic delineation of the ventral lateral thalamic region in the monkey. Brain Res. Rev. 5: 219–235, 1983.
 30. Asanuma, C., W. T. Thach, and E. G. Jones. Distribution of cerebellar terminations and their relation to other afferent terminations in the ventral lateral thalamic region of the monkey. Brain Res. Rev. 5: 237–265, 1983.
 31. Asanuma, H., K. D. Larsen, and H. Yumiya. Direct sensory pathway to the motor cortex in the monkey: a basis of cortical reflexes. In: Integration in the Nervous System, edited by H. Asanuma and V. J. Wilson. Tokyo: Igaku‐Shoin, 1979, p. 223–238.
 32. Asanuma, H., K. Larsen, and H. Yumiya. Peripheral input pathways to the monkey motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 38: 349–355, 1980.
 33. Asanuma, H., K. D. Larsen, and P. Zarzecke. Peripheral input pathways projecting to the motor cortex in the cat. Brain Res. 172: 197–208, 1979.
 34. Azulay, A., and A. D. Schwartz. The role of the dorsal funiculus of the primate in tactile discrimination. Exp. Neurol. 46: 315–332, 1975.
 35. Bando, T., A. Zambelli, and W. A. Spencer. Rebound excitation and the rhythmic activity of the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus. Brain Res. 192: 29–38, 1980.
 36. Bard, P. Studies on the cortical representation of somatic sensibility. Harvey Lect. 1937/38, p. 143–169.
 37. Bartley, S. H., and G. H. Bishop. The cortical response to stimulation of the optic nerve in the rabbit. Am. J. Physiol. 103: 159–184, 1933.
 38. Basbaum, A. I., and P. J. Hand. Projections of cervico‐thoracic dorsal roots to the cuneate nucleus of the rat with observations on cellular bricks. J. Comp. Neurol. 148: 347–360, 1973.
 39. Basbaum, A. I., and P. D. Wall. Chronic changes in the response of cells in adult cat dorsal horn following partial deafferentation: the appearance of responding cells in a previously unresponsive region. Brain Res. 116: 181–204, 1976.
 40. Beck, C. H. Dual dorsal columns: a review. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 3: 1–7, 1976.
 41. Beck, C. H. M. Forelimb performance by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) before and after dorsal column lesions. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 90: 353–362, 1976.
 42. BÉKésy, G. VON. Sensory Inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1967.
 43. Belford, G. R., and H. P. Killacky. The sensitive period in the development of the trigeminal system of the neonatal rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 193: 335–350, 1980.
 44. Bennett, R. E., D. G. Ferrington, and M. Rowe. Tactile neuron classes within second somatosensory area (SII) of cat cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 292–309, 1980.
 45. Berkley, K. J. Different targets of different neurons in nucleus gracilis of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 163: 285–304, 1975.
 46. Berkley, K. J. Spatial relationships between the terminations of somatic sensory and motor pathways in the rostral brainstem of cats and monkeys. I. Ascending somatic sensory inputs to lateral diencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 193: 283–317, 1980.
 47. Berkley, K. J. Afferent projections to and near the ventrobasal complex in the cat and monkey. In: Somatosensory Integration in the Thalamus, edited by G. Macchi, A. Rustioni, and R. Spreafico. New York: Elsevier. In press.
 48. Berkley, K. J., A. Blomqvist, A. Pelt, and R. Flink. Differences in the collateralization of neuronal projections from the dorsal column nuclei and lateral cervical nucleus to the thalamus and tectum in the cat: an anatomical study using two different double‐labelling techniques. Brain Res. 202: 273–290, 1980.
 49. Berkley, K. J., and P. J. Hand. Efferent projections of the gracile nucleus in the cat. Brain Res. 153: 263–283, 1978.
 50. Berkley, K. J., and P. J. Hand. Projections to the inferior olive of the cat. II. Comparisons of input from the gracile, cuneate and the spinal trigeminal nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol. 180: 253–264, 1978.
 51. Berkley, K. J., and D. C. Mash. Somatic sensory projections to the prectectum in the cat. Brain Res. 158: 445–449, 1978.
 52. Berkley, K. J., and I. G. Worden. Projections to the inferior olive of the cat. I. Comparisons of input from the dorsal column nuclei, the lateral cervical nucleus, the spino‐olivary pathways, the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum. J. Comp. Neurol. 180: 237–252, 1978.
 53. Berman, A. L. Overlap of somatic and auditory cortical response fields in anterior ectosylvian gyrus of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 24: 595–607, 1961.
 54. Berman, A. L. The Brain Stem of the Cat. A Cytoarchitectonic Atlas with Stereotaxic Coordinates. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1968.
 55. Biedenbach, M. A. Cell density and regional distribution of cell types in the cuneate nucleus of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 45: 1–14, 1972.
 56. Biedenbach, M. A., S. J. Jabbur, and A. L. Towe. Afferent inhibition in the cuneate nucleus of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 27: 179–183, 1971.
 57. Biedenbach, M. A., and A. L. Towe. Functionally distinct areas in the cuneate nucleus of the rhesus monkey (Abstract). Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. Sci., 25th, Munich, 1971, vol. 9, p. 64.
 58. Bioulac, B., and Y. Lamarre. Activity of postcentral cortical neurons of the monkey during conditioned movements of a deafferented limb. Brain Res. 31: 427–437, 1979.
 59. Bjorkelund, M., and J. Boivie. Projections to midbrain from lateral cervical nucleus in cat. Neuroscience 7, Suppl.: S28, 1982.
 60. Blair, R. W., R. N. Weber, and R. D. Foreman. Characteristics of primate spinothalamic tract neurons receiving viscerosomatic convergent inputs in T3‐T5, segments. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 797–811, 1981.
 61. Blomqvist, A., R. Flink, D. Bowsher, S. Griph, and J. Westman. Tectal and thalamic projections of dorsal column and lateral cervical nuclei: a quantitative study in the cat. Brain Res. 141: 335–341, 1978.
 62. Blomqvist, A., and J. Westman. Interneurons and initial axon collaterals in the feline gracile nucleus demonstrated with rapid Golgi technique. Brain Res. 111: 407–410, 1976.
 63. Boesten, A. J. P., and J. Voogd. Projections of the dorsal column nuclei and the spinal cord on the inferior olive of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 161: 215–238, 1975.
 64. Boivie, J. The termination of the cervicothalamic tract in the cat. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods. Brain Res. 19: 333–360, 1970.
 65. Boivie, J. The termination in the thalamus and the zona incerta of fibres from the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) in the cat. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods. Brain Res. 28: 459–490, 1971.
 66. Boivie, J. The termination of the spinothalamic tract in the cat. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods. Exp. Brain Res. 12: 331–353, 1971.
 67. Boivie, J. Anatomical observations on the dorsal column nuclei, their thalamic projection and the cytoarchitecture of some somatosensory thalamic nuclei in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 178: 17–48, 1978.
 68. Boivie, J. An anatomical reinvestigation of the termination of the spinothalamic tract in the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 186: 343–369, 1979.
 69. Boivie, J. Thalamic projections from lateral cervical nucleus in the monkey. A degeneration study. Brain Res. 198: 13–26, 1980.
 70. Boivie, J., and K. Boman. Termination of a separate (proprioceptive) cuneothalamic tract from external nucleus in monkey. Brain Res. 224: 235–246, 1981.
 71. Boivie, J., G. Grant, D. Albe‐fessard, and A. Levante. Evidence for a projection to the thalamus from the external cuneate nucleus in the monkey. Neurosci. Lett. 1: 3–8, 1975.
 72. Bowker, R. M., and J. D. Coulter. Intracortical connectivities of somatic sensory and motor areas: multiple cortical pathways in monkeys. In: Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas, edited by C. N. Woolsey. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1, p. 205–242.
 73. Bowsher, D. The termination of secondary somatosensory neurons within the thalamus of Macca mulatta: an experimental degeneration study. J. Comp. Neurol. 117: 213–227, 1961.
 74. Brinkman, J., B. M. Bush, and R. Porter. Deficient influences of peripheral stimuli on precentral neurons in monkeys with dorsal column lesions. J. Physiol. London 276: 27–48, 1978.
 75. Brinkman, J., and R. Porter. Movement performance and afferent projections to sensorimotor cortex in monkeys with dorsal column lesions. In: Active Touch, edited by G. Gordon. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1978, p. 119–138.
 76. Brodal, A., and O. Pompeiano. The vestibular nuclei in the cat. J. Anat. 91: 438–454, 1957.
 77. Brodal, A., and B. Rexed. Spinal afferents to the lateral cervical nucleus in cat. An experimental study. J. Comp. Neurol. 98: 179–211, 1953.
 78. Brodal, A., F. Walberg, and Th. Blackstad. Termination of spinal afferents to inferior olive in cat. J. Neurophysiol. 13: 431–454, 1950.
 79. Bromberg, M. B., P. Blum, and D. Whitehorn. Quantitative characteristics of inhibition in the cuneate nucleus of the cat. Exp. Neurol. 48: 37–56, 1975.
 80. Bromberg, M. B., J. A. Burnham, and A. L. Towe. Doubly projecting neurons of the dorsal column nuclei. Neurosci. Lett. 25: 215–220, 1981.
 81. Bromberg, M. B., and D. Whitehorn. Myelinated fiber types in the superficial radial nerve of the cat and their central projections. Brain Res. 78: 157–163, 1974.
 82. Browder, J., and J. P. Gallagher. Dorsal cordotomy for painful phantom limb. Ann. Surg. 128: 456–469, 1948.
 83. Brown, A. G. Cutaneous afferent fiber collaterals in the dorsal columns of the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 5: 293–305, 1968.
 84. Brown, A. G. Descending control of the spinocervical tract in decerebrate cats. Brain Res. 17: 152–155, 1970.
 85. Brown, A. G. Effects of descending impulses on transmission through the spinocervical tract. J. Physiol. London 219: 103–125, 1971.
 86. Brown, A. G. Ascending and long spinal pathways: dorsal columns, spinocervical tract, and spinothalamic tract. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Somatosensory Systems, edited by A. Iggo. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1973, vol. 2, p. 315–338.
 87. Brown, A. G. Organization in the spinal cord. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1981.
 88. Brown, A. G., and D. N. Franz. Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to natural stimulation of identified cutaneous receptors. Exp. Brain Res. 7: 231–249, 1969.
 89. Brown, A. G., and R. E. W. Fyffe. Form and function of dorsal horn neurones with axons ascending the dorsal columns in the cat. J. Physiol. London 321: 31–47, 1981.
 90. Brown, A. G., R. E. W. Fyffe, R. Noble, P. K. Rose, and P. J. Snow. The density distribution and topographical organization of spinocervical tract neurones in the cat. J. Physiol. London. 300: 409–428, 1980.
 91. Brown, A. G., G. Gordon, and R. H. Kay. A study of single axons in the cat's medial lemniscus. J. Physiol. London 236: 225–246, 1974.
 92. Brown, A. G., W. C. Hamann, and H. F. Martin III. Effects of activity in non‐myelinated afferent fibres on the spinocervical tract. Brain Res. 98: 243–259, 1975.
 93. Brown, A. G., C. R. House, P. K. Rose, and P. J. Snow. The morphology of spinocervical tract neurones in the cat. J. Physiol. London 260: 719–738, 1976.
 94. Brown, A. G., and R. Noble. Connexions between hair follicle afferent fibres and spinocervical tract neurones in the cat: the synthesis of receptive fields. J. Physiol. London 323: 77–91, 1982.
 95. Brown, A. G., P. K. Rose, and P. J. Snow. The morphology of spinocervical tract neurones revealed by intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase. J. Physiol. London 270: 747–764, 1977.
 96. Brown, A. G., P. K. Rose, and P. J. Snow. The morphology of hair follicle afferent fibre collaterals in the spinal cord of the cat. J. Physiol. London 272: 779–797, 1977.
 97. Brown, A. G., P. K. Rose, and P. J. Snow. Dendritic trees and cutaneous receptive fields of adjacent spinocervical tract neurones in the cat. J. Physiol. London 300: 429–440, 1980.
 98. Brugge, J. F., and T. J. Imig. Some relationships of binaural response patterns of single neurons to cortical columns and interhemispheric connections of auditory area AI of cat cerebral cortex. In: Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, edited by R. F. Nauton and C. Fernandez. New York: Academic, 1978, p. 487–503.
 99. Bryan, R. N., J. D. Coulter, and W. D. Willis. Cells of origin of the spinocervical tract in the monkey. Exp. Neurol. 42: 574–586, 1974.
 100. Bryan, R. N., D. L. Trevino, J. D. Coulter, and W. D. Willis. Location and somatotopic organization of the cells of origin of the spinocervical tract. Exp. Brain Res. 17: 177–189, 1973.
 101. Burchfiel, J. L., and F. H. Duffy. Muscle afferent input to single cells in primate somatosensory cortex. Brain Res. 45: 241–246, 1972.
 102. Burchfiel, J. L., and F. H. Duffy. Corticofugal influences upon cat thalamic ventrobasal complex. Brain Res. 70: 395–411, 1974.
 103. Burgess, P. R., and F. J. Clark. Dorsal column projection of fibres from the cat knee joint. J. Physiol. London 203: 301–315, 1969.
 104. Burton, H., and E. G. Jones. The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in the New World and Old World monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 168: 249–302, 1976.
 105. Burton, H., and A. D. Loewy. Projections to the spinal cord from medullary somatosensory relay nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol. 173: 773–792, 1977.
 106. Burton, H., G. Mitchell, and D. Brent. Second somatic sensory area in the cerebral cortex of cats: somatotopic organization and cytoarchitecture. J. Comp. Neural. 210: 109–135, 1982.
 107. Burton, H., and C. J. Robinson. Organization of the SII parietal cortex. Multiple sensory representations within and near the second somatic area of cynomolgus monkeys. In: Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas, edited by C. N. Woolsey. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1, p. 67–119.
 108. Bystrzyka, E., B. S. Nail, and M. Rowe. Inhibition of cuneate neurons: its afferent source and influence on dynamically sensitive “tactile” neurons. J. Physiol. London 268: 9251–270, 1977.
 109. Caminiti, R., and G. M. Innocenti. The postnatal development of somatosensory callosal connections after partial lesions of somatosensory areas. Exp. Brain Res. 42: 53–62, 1981.
 110. Caminiti, R., G. M. Innocenti, and T. Manzoni. The anatomical substrate of callosal messages from SI and SII in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 35: 295–314, 1979.
 111. Carli, G., R. H. LAmotte, and V. B. Mountcastle. A simultaneous study of somatic sensory behavior and the activity of somatic sensory cortical neurons (Abstract). Federation Proc. 30: 664, 1971.
 112. Carli, G., R. H. LAmotte, and V. B. Mountcastle. A comparison of sensory behavior and the activity of postcentral cortical neurons, observed simultaneously, elicited by oscillatory mechanical stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand in monkeys. Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. Sci., 25th, Munich, 1971.
 113. Carlson, M., and K. A. Fitzpatrick. Organization of the hand area in the primary somatic sensory cortex (SmI) of the prosimian primate, Nycticebus coucang J. Comp. Neurol. 204: 280–295, 1982.
 114. Carlson, M., and C. Welt. Somatic sensory cortex (SmI) of the prosimian primate Galago crassicaudatus: organization of mechanoreceptive input from the hand in relation to cytoarchitecture. J. Comp. Neurol. 189: 249–271, 1980.
 115. Carlson, M., and C. Welt. The somatic sensory cortex: SmI in prosimian primates. In: Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas, edited by C. N. Woolsey. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1, p. 1–27.
 116. Carpenter, M. B., B. M. Stein, and J. E. Shriver. Central projections of spinal dorsal roots in the monkey. II. Lower thoracic lumbosacral, and coccygeal dorsal roots. Am. J. Anat. 123: 75–118, 1968.
 117. Carreras, M., and S. A. Andersson. Functional properties of neurons of the anterior ectosylvian gyrus of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 26: 100–126, 1963.
 118. Carstens, E., and D. L. Trevino. Laminar origins of spinothalamic projections in the cat as determined by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. J. Comp. Neurol. 182: 151–165, 1978.
 119. Catalano, J. V., and G. Lamarche. Central pathway for cutaneous impulses in the cat. Am. J. Physiol. 189: 141–144, 1958.
 120. Cervero, F., A. Iggo, and V. Molony. Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to noxious stimulation of the skin. J. Physiol. London 267: 537–558, 1977.
 121. Chang, H.‐T., and T. C. Ruch. Organization of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord and their nuclei in the spider monkey. J. Anat. 81: 140–149, 1947.
 122. Chang, H.‐T., and T. C. Ruch. Topographical distribution of spinothalamic fibres in the thalamus of the spider monkey. J. Anat. 81: 150–164, 1947.
 123. Christiansen, J. Neurological observations of macaques with spinal cord lesions. Anat. Rec. 154: 330, 1966.
 124. Clark, F. J. Central projection of sensory fibers from the cat knee joint. J. Neurobiol. 3: 101–110, 1972.
 125. Clark, F. J., S. Landgren, and H. Silfvenius. Projection to the cat's cerebral cortex from low threshold joint afferents. Acta Physiol. Scand. 89: 504–521, 1973.
 126. Clarke, W. E. LEgros. The termination of the ascending tracts in the thalamus of the macaque monkey. J. Anat. 71: 7–40, 1936.
 127. Clemo, H. R., and B. E. Stein. Somatosensory cortex: a “new” somatotopic representation. Brain Res. 235: 162–168, 1982.
 128. Conrad, B., J. Meyer‐lohmann, K. Matsunami, and V. B. Brooks. Precentral unit activity following torque pulse injections into elbow movements. Brain Res. 94: 219–236, 1975.
 129. Cook, A. W., and E. J. Browder. Function of posterior columns in man. Arch. Neurol. Chicago 12: 72–79, 1965.
 130. Costanzo, R. M., and E. P. Gardner. A quantitative analysis of responses of direction‐sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1319–1341, 1980.
 131. Costanzo, R. M., and E. P. Gardner. Multiple‐joint neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. Brain Res. 214: 321–333, 1981.
 132. Craig, A. D. Jr.. Spinal and medullary input to the lateral cervical nucleus. J. Comp. Neurol. 181: 729–744, 1978.
 133. Craig, A. D. Jr., and H. Burton. The lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: anatomic organization of cervicothalamic neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 185: 329–346, 1979.
 134. Craig, A. D., Jr., and H. Burton. Spinothalamic terminations in the ventroposterolateral nucleus of the cat. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 5: 705, 1979.
 135. Craig, A. D., Jr., and H. Burton. Spinal and medullary lamina I projecion to nucleus submedius in medial thalamus: a possible pain center. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 443–466, 1981.
 136. Craig, A. D., Jr., and D. N. Tapper. Lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: functional organization and characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 41: 1511–1534, 1978.
 137. Creutzfeldt, O. D. Generality of the functional structure of the neocortex. Naturwissenschaften 64: 507–517, 1977.
 138. Darian‐smith, I. The trigeminal system. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Somatosensory System, edited by A. Iggo. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1973, vol. 2, p. 271–314.
 139. Darian‐smith, I., J. Isbister, H. Mok, and T. Yokota. Somatic sensory projection areas excited by tactile stimulation of the cat: a triple representation. J. Physiol. London 182: 671–689, 1966.
 140. Darian‐smith, I., M. Sugitano, J. Heywood, K. Karita, and A. Goodwin. Touching textured surfaces: cells in somatosensory cortex respond to both finger movement and to surface features. Science 218: 906–909, 1982.
 141. Dart, A. M. Cells of the dorsal column nuclei projecting down into the spinal cord. J. Physiol. London 219: 29P–30P, 1971.
 142. Dart, A. M., and G. Gordon. Some properties of spinal connections of the cat's dorsal column nuclei which do not involve the dorsal columns. Brain Res. 58: 61–68, 1973.
 143. Deecke, L., D. W. F. Schwarz, and J. M. Fredrickson. The vestibular thalamus in the rhesus monkey. Adv. Oto Rhino Laryngol. 19: 210–219, 1973.
 144. Deecke, L., D. W. F. Schwarz, and J. M. Fredrickson. Single unit recordings in the vestibular thalamus (VPI area) of the macaque. Pfluegers Arch. 339, Suppl.: R79, 1973.
 145. Deecke, L., D. W. F. Schwarz, and J. M. Fredrickson. Nucleus ventroposterior inferior (VPI) as the vestibular thalamic relay in the rhesus monkey. I. Field potential investigation. Exp. Brain Res. 20: 88–100, 1974.
 146. Deecke, L., D. W. F. Schwarz, and J. M. Fredrickson. Vestibular responses in the rhesus monkey ventroposterior thalamus. II. Vestibulo proprioceptive convergence at thalamic neurons. Exp. Brain Res. 30: 219–232, 1977.
 147. Desmedt, J. E., and G. Cheron. Recent progress in the understanding of subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Adv. Neurol. 32: 295–302, 1982.
 148. Desmedt, J. E., and G. Cheron. Somatosensory evoked potentials in man: subcortical and cortical components and their neural basis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 388: 388–411, 1982.
 149. deVito, J. L., T. C. Ruch, and H. D. Patton. Analysis of residual weight discriminatory ability and evoked potentials following section of dorsal columns in monkeys. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 8: 117–126, 1964.
 150. Devor, M., and P. D. Wall. Reorganization of spinal cord sensory map after peripheral nerve injury. Nature London 276: 75–76, 1978.
 151. Devor, M., and P. D. Wall. Plasticity in the spinal cord sensory map after peripheral nerve injury. J. Neurosci. 1: 679–784, 1981.
 152. Diamond, I. T., W. Randall, and L. Springer. Tactual localization in cats deprived of cortical areas SI and SII and the dorsal columns. Psychon. Sci. 1: 261–262, 1964.
 153. Dilly, P N., P. D. Wall, and K. E. Webster. Cells of origin of the spinothalamic tract in the cat and rat. Exp. Neurol. 21: 550–562, 1968.
 154. Doetsch, G. S., C. E. Massey, B. T. Wilson, and A. M. Kelahan. Time‐dependent functional changes in somatosensory cerebral cortex following digit amputation in adult raccoons. J. Comp. Neurol. In press.
 155. Dong, W. K., and I. H. Wagman. Modulation of nociceptive responses in the thalamic posterior group of nuclei. Adv. Pain Res. Ther. 1: 455–460, 1976.
 156. Dostrovsky, J. O., and J. Millar. Receptive fields of gracile neurons after transection of the dorsal columns. Exp. Neurol. 56: 610–621, 1977.
 157. Dostrovsky, J. O., J. Millar, and P. D. Wall. The immediate shift of affluent drive of dorsal column nucleus cells following deafferentation: a comparison of acute and chronic deafferentation in gracile nucleus and spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 52: 480–495, 1976.
 158. Douglas, P. R., D. G. Ferrington, and R. Rowe. Coding of information about tactile stimuli by neurones of the cuneate nucleus. J. Physiol. London 285: 493–513, 1978.
 159. Dreyer, D. A., M. Hollins, and B. L. Whitsel. Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity. Sens. Processes 2: 71–79, 1978.
 160. Dreyer, D. A., P. R. Loe, C. B. Metz, and B. L. Whitsel. Representation of head and face in postcentral gyrus of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 714–733, 1975.
 161. Dreyer, D. A., R. J. Schneider, C. B. Metz, and B. L. Whitsel. Differential contributions of spinal pathways to body representation in postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta J. Neurophysiol. 37: 119–145, 1974.
 162. Dubrovsky, B., E. Davelaar, and E. Garcia‐rill. The role of the dorsal columns in serial order acts. Exp. Neurol. 33: 93–102, 1971.
 163. Dubrovsky, B., and E. Garcia‐rill. The role of the dorsal columns in sequential motor acts requiring precise forelimb projection. Exp. Brain Res. 18: 165–177, 1973.
 164. Duncan, G. H., D. A. Dreyer, T. M. McKenna, and B. L. Whitsel. Dose‐ and time‐dependent effects of ketamine on SI neurons with cutaneous receptive fields. J. Neurophysiol. 47: 677–699, 1982.
 165. Durham, D., and T. A. Woolsey. Acute whisker removal reduces neuronal activity in barrels of mouse SMI cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 178: 629–644, 1978.
 166. Dyhre‐poulsen, P. Impairment of tactile tracking after dorsal column lesions in monkeys (Abstract). Exp. Bain Res. Suppl. 23: 64, 1975. (Eur. Neurosci. Meet., 1st, Munich, 1975.)
 167. Dykes, R. W., and A. Gabor. Magnification functions and receptive field sequences for submodality‐specific bands in SI cortex of cats. J. Comp. Neurol. 202: 597–620, 1981.
 168. Dykes, R. W., C. S. Lin, and N. Rehman. Thalamocortical projection nuclei for modality‐specific regions of somatosensory cortex—demonstration of different projections for areas 3a and 3b of the cat (Abstract). Physiologist. 23 (4): 73, 1980.
 169. Dykes, R. W., D. D. Rasmusson, and P. B. Hoeltzell. Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1527–1546, 1980.
 170. Dykes, R. W., D. D. Rasmusson, D. Stretavan, and N. B. Rehman. Submodality segregation and receptive‐field sequences in the cuneate, gracile, and external cuneate nuclei of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 47: 389–416, 1982.
 171. Dykes, R. W., M. Sur, M. M. Merzenich, J. H. Kaas, and R. J. Nelson. Regional segregation of neurons responding to quickly adapting, slowly adapting, deep and Pacinian receptors within thalamic ventroposterior lateral and ventroposterior inferior nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Samiri sciureus) Neuroscience 6: 1687–1698, 1981.
 172. Ebbesson, S. O. E. A connection between the dorsal column nuclei and the dorsal accessory olive. Brain Res. 8: 393–397, 1968.
 173. Eccles, J. C. The modular operation of the cerebral neocortex considered as the material basis of mental events. Neuroscience 6: 1839–1856, 1981.
 174. Edwards, S. B., C. L. Ginsburgh, C. K. Henkel, and B. E. Stein. Sources of subcortical projections to the superior colliculus in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 184: 309–330, 1979.
 175. Eidelberg, E., B. Woolfe, C. J. Kreinick, and F. Davis. Role of the dorsal funiculi in movement control. Brain Res. 114: 427–438, 1976.
 176. Ennever, J. A., and A. L. Towe. Response of somatosensory cerebral neurons to stimulation of dorsal and dorsolateral spinal funiculi. Exp. Neurol. 43: 124–142, 1974.
 177. Evarts, E. V. Precentral and postcentral cortical activity in association with visually triggered movement. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 373–381, 1974.
 178. Evarts, E. Role of motor cortex in voluntary movements in primates. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control, edited by V. B. Brooks. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1981, sect. 1, vol. II, pt. 2, chapt. 23, p. 1083–1120.
 179. Evarts, E. V., and C. Fromm. Sensory responses in motor cortex neurons during precise motor control. Neurosci. Lett. 5: 267–272, 1977.
 180. Evarts, E. V., and C. Fromm. Transcortical reflexes and servo control of movement. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 59: 757–775, 1981.
 181. Fedina, L., G. Gordon, and A. Lundberg. The source and mechanisms of inhibition in the lateral cervical nucleus of the cat. Brain Res. 11: 694–696, 1968.
 182. Ferraro, A., and S. E. Barrera. The posterior column nuclei in Macacus rhesus monkeys. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry London 33: 262–275, 1934.
 183. Ferraro, A., and S. E. Barrera. Effects of experimental lesions of the posterior columns in Macacus rhesus monkeys. Brain 57: 307–332, 1934.
 184. Ferraro, A., and S. E. Barrera. The effect of lesions of the dorsal column nuclei in the Macacus rhesus. Brain 59: 76–99, 1936.
 185. Ferrington, D. G., and M. Rowe. Differential contributions to coding of cutaneous vibratory information by cortical somatosensory areas I and II. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 310–331, 1980.
 186. Fetz, E. E., and M. A. Baker. Response properties of precentral neurons in awake monkeys (Abstract). Physiologist. 12 (3): 223, 1969.
 187. Fisher, G. R., B. Freeman, and M. J. Rowe. Organization of parallel projections from Pacinian afferent fibers to somatosensory cortical areas I and II in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 49: 75–97, 1983.
 188. Fitzpatrick, K. A., M. Carlson, and J. Charlton. Topography, cytoarchitecture, and sulcal patterns in primary somatic sensory cortex (SmI) prosimian primate, Perodicticus potto J. Comp. Neurol. 204: 296–310, 1982.
 189. Foerster, O., and O. Gagel. Die Vorderseitenstrongdur‐chochneidurg bein Menschen. Eine blinesch‐patho‐physiologisch‐anatomisch Studie. Z. Gesamte Neurol. Psychiatr. 138: 1–92, 1932.
 190. Foreman, R. D., A. E. Applebaum, J. E. Beall, D. L. Trevino, and W. D. Willis. Responses of primate spinothalamic tract neurons to electrical stimulation of hindlimb peripheral nerves. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 132–145, 1975.
 191. Foreman, R. D., D. R. Kenshalo, Jr., R. F. Schmidt, and W. D. Willis. Field potentials and excitation of primate spinothalamic neurones in response to volleys in muscle afferents. J. Physiol. London 286: 197–213, 1979.
 192. Foreman, R. D., R. F. Schmidt, and W. D. Willis. Effects of mechanical and chemical stimulation of fine muscle afferents upon primate spinothalamic tract cells. J. Physiol. London 286: 215–231, 1979.
 193. Frank, J. L. Functional reorganization of cat somatic sensory‐motor cortex (SMI) after selective dorsal root rhizotomies. Brain Res. 186: 458–462, 1980.
 194. Franzen, O. The dependence of vibrotactile threshold and magnitude functions on the stimulation frequency and signal level. A perceptual and neural comparison. Scand. J. Psychol. 10: 289–298, 1969.
 195. Franzen, O., and E. Torebjork. Precision and ambiguity in coding vibrotactile stimuli. In: Sensory Functions of the Skin of Humans, edited by D. R. Kenshalo. New York: Plenum, 1979, p. 39–66.
 196. Fredrickson, J. M., U. Figge, P. Scheid, and H. H. Kornhuber. Vestibular nerve projection to the cerebral cortex of the rhesus monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 2: 318–327, 1966.
 197. Fredrickson, J. M., H. H. Kornhuber, and D. W. F. Schwarz. Cortical projection of the vestibular nerve. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vestibular System, edited by H. H. Kornhuber. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1974, vol. 6, p. 565–582.
 198. Frederickson, J. M., D. Schwarz, and H. H. Kornhuber. Convergence and interaction of vestibular and deep somatic afferents upon neurons in the vestibular nuclei of the cat. Acta Oto‐Laryngol. 61: 168–188, 1965.
 199. Friedman, D. P. Body topography in second somatic sensory area. Monkey SII somatotopy. In: Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas, edited by C. N. Woolsey. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1, p. 121–165.
 200. Friedman, D. P., and E. G. Jones. Thalamic input to areas 3a and 2 in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 59–85, 1981.
 201. Friedman, D. P., E. G. Jones, and H. Burton. Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 192: 21–41, 1980.
 202. Fromm, C., and E. V. Evarts. Pyramidal tract neurons in somatosensory cortex: central and peripheral inputs during voluntary movement. Brain Res. 238: 186–191, 1982.
 203. Frommer, G. P., B. R. Trefz, and K. L. Casey. Somatosensory function and cortical unit activity in cats with only dorsal column fibers. Exp. Brain Res. 27: 113–129, 1977.
 204. Ganchrow, D., and J. J. Bernstein. Projections of caudal fasciculus gracilis to nucleus gracilis and other medullary structures, and Clarke's nucleus in the rat. Brain Res. 205: 383–390, 1981.
 205. Ganchrow, D., J. Margolin, L. Perez, and J. J. Bernstein. Patterns of reafferentation in rat nucleus gracilis after dorsal column lesions. Exp. Neurol. 71: 437–451, 1981.
 206. Gardner, E., and F. Morin. Projection of fast afferents to the cerebral cortex of monkey. Am. J. Physiol. 189: 152–158, 1957.
 207. Gardner, E. P., and R. M. Costanzo. Spatial integration of multiple‐point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 420–443, 1980.
 208. Gardner, E. P., and R. M. Costanzo. Temporal integration of multiple‐point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 444–468, 1980.
 209. Gardner, E. P., and R. M. Costanzo. Neuronal mechanisms underlying direction sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1342–1354, 1980.
 210. Gardner, E. P., and R. M. Costanzo. Properties of kinesthetic neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. Brain Res. 214: 301–319, 1981.
 211. Gardner, E. P., and W. A. Spencer. Sensory funneling. I. Psychophysical observations of human subjects and responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents in the cat to patterned skin stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 925–953, 1972.
 212. Gardner, E. P., and W. A. Spencer. Sensory funneling. II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 954–977, 1972.
 213. Gardner, E. P., and J. M. Tast. Psychophysical measurements of perceived intensity of single‐point and multiple‐point cutaneous stimuli in humans and subhuman primates. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 479–495, 1981.
 214. Gaze, R. M., and G. Gordon. The representation of cutaneous sense in the thalamus of the cat and monkey. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 39: 279–304, 1954.
 215. Gaze, R. M., and G. Gordon. Some observations on the central pathway for cutaneous impulses in the cat. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 40: 187–194, 1955.
 216. Geisler, G. L., Jr., R. P. Yezierski, K. D. Gerhart, and W. D. Willis. Spinothalamic tract neurons that project to medial and/or lateral thalamic nuclei: evidence for a physiologically novel population of spinal cord neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1285–1308, 1981.
 217. Gerard, R. W., W. H. Marshall, and L. J. Saul. Cerebral action potentials. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 30: 1123–1125, 1933.
 218. Gerard, R. W., W. H. Marshall, and L. J. Saul. Electrical activity to the cat's brain. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 36: 675–735, 1936.
 219. Gilman, S., and D. Denny‐brown. Disorders of movement and behaviour following dorsal column lesions. Brain 89: 397–418, 1966.
 220. Glees, P., and J. Soler. Fibre content of the posterior column and synaptic connection of nucleus gracilis. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 36: 381–400, 1951.
 221. Goldman, P. S., and W. H. J. Nauta. Columnar distribution of cortico‐cortical fibers in the frontal association limbic and motor cortex of the developing rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 122: 393–413, 1977.
 222. Goldman‐rakic, P. S., and M. E. Schwartz. Interdigitation of contralateral and ipsilateral columnar projections to frontal association cortex in primates. Science 216: 755–757, 1982.
 223. Goldring, S., and R. Ratcheson. Human motor cortex: sensory input data from single neuron recordings. Science 175: 1493–1495, 1972.
 224. Golovchinsky, V. Patterns of responses of neurons in cuneate nucleus to controlled mechanical stimulation of cutaneous velocity receptors in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1673–1699, 1980.
 225. Gordon, G., and G. Grant. Afferents to the dorsal column nuclei from the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord. Acta Physiol. Scand. 84: 30A–31A, 1972.
 226. Gordon, G., and M. G. M. Jukes. Dual organization of the exteroceptive components of the cat's gracile nucleus. J. Physiol. London 173: 263–290, 1964.
 227. Gordon, G., and M. G. M. Jukes. Descending influences on the exteroceptive organizations of the cat's gracile nucleus. J. Physiol. London 173: 291–319, 1964.
 228. Gordon, G., and C. H. Paine. Functional organization in nucleus gracilis of the cat. J. Physiol. London 153: 331–349, 1960.
 229. Grant, G., J. Boivie, and H. Silfvenius. Course and termination of fibres from the nucleus Z of the medulla oblongata. An experimental light microscopical study in the cat. Brain Res. 55: 55–70, 1973.
 230. Grant, G., S. Landgren, and H. Silfvenius. Columnar distribution of U‐fibres from the postcruciate cerebral projection area of the cat's group I muscle afferents. Exp. Brain Res. 24: 57–74, 1975.
 231. Grant, G., and J. Westman. The lateral cervical nucleus in the cat. IV. A light and electron microscopical study after midbrain lesions with demonstration of indirect wallerian degeneration at the ultra‐structural level. Exp. Brain Res. 1: 51–67, 1969.
 232. Graybiel, A. M. The thalamo‐cortical projection of the so‐called posterior nuclear group: a study with anterograde degeneration methods in the cat. Brain Res. 49: 229–244, 1973.
 233. Green, D. M., and J. A. Swets. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
 234. Groenewegen, H. J., A. J. P. Boesten, and J. Voogd. The dorsal column nuclear projections to the nucleus ventralis posterior lateralis thalami and the inferior olive in the cat: an autoradiographic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 162: 505–519, 1975.
 235. Guilbaud, G., D. Caille, J. M. Besson, and G. Benelli. Single unit activities in ventral posterior and posterior group thalamic nuclei during nociceptive and non‐nociceptive stimulations in the cat. Arch. Ital. Biol. 115: 38–56, 1977.
 236. Guillery, R. W., H. O. Adrian, C. N. Woolsey, and J. E. Rose. Activation of somatosensory areas I and II of cat's cerebral cortex by focal stimulation of the ventrobasal complex. In: The Thalamus, edited by D. W. Purpura and M. D. Yahr. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1966.
 237. Gulley, R. L. Golgi studies of the nucleus gracilis in the rat. Anat. Rec. 111: 325–342, 1973.
 238. Gwyn, D. G., and H. A. Waldron. A nucleus in the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord of the rat. Brain Res. 16: 301–351, 1969.
 239. Gybels, J., and J. Van Hels. Unit activity from mechanoreceptors in human peripheral nerve during intensity discrimination of touch. In: Neurophysiology Studied in Man, edited by G. G. Somjen. Amsterdam: Excerpta Med., 1972, p. 198–206.
 240. Ha, H. The cervicothalamic tract in the rhesus monkey. Exp. Neurol. 33: 205–212, 1971.
 241. Ha, H., S. Kitai, and F. Morin. The lateral cervical nucleus of the racoon. Exp. Neurol. 11: 441–450, 1965.
 242. Ha, H., and F. Morin. Comparative anatomical observations of the cervical nucleus, N. cervicalis lateralis, of some primates. Anat. Rec. 148: 374–375, 1964.
 243. Hagg, S., and H. Ha. Cervicothalamic tract in the dog. J. Comp. Neurol. 139: 357–373, 1970.
 244. Haight, J. R. The general organization of somatotopic projections to SII cerebral neocortex in the cat. Brain Res. 44: 483–502, 1972.
 245. Hamilton, T. C., and J. I. Johnson. Somatotopic organization related to nuclear morphology in the cuneate‐gracile complex of opossums Didelphis marsupialis virginiana Brain Res. 51: 125–140, 1973.
 246. Hand, P. J. Lumbosacral dorsal root terminations in the nucleus gracilis of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 126: 137–156, 1966.
 247. Hand, P. J. Plasticity of the rat cortical barrel system. In: Changing Concepts of the Nervous System, edited by A. R. Morrison and P. Strick. New York: Academic, 1982, p. 49–68.
 248. Hand, P. J., and C. N. Liu. Efferent projections of the nucleus gracilis. Anat. Rec. 154: 353–354, 1966.
 249. Hand P. J., and A. R. Morrison. Thalamocortical projections from the ventrobasal complex to somatic sensory areas I and II. Exp. Neurol. 26: 291–308, 1970.
 250. Hand, P. J., and T. Van Winkle. The efferent connections of the feline nucleus cuneatus. J. Comp. Neurol. 171: 83–110, 1977.
 251. Harrington, T., and M. M. Merzenich. Neural coding in the sense of touch: human sensations of skin indentation compared with the responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 10: 251–264, 1970.
 252. Harris, F., S. J. Jabbur, R. W. Morse, and A. L. Towe. Influence of the cerebral cortex on the cuneate nucleus of the monkey. Nature London 208: 1215–1216, 1965.
 253. Hayward, J. N. Response of ventrobasal thalamic cells to hair displacement on the face of the waking monkey. J. Physiol. London 250: 385–407, 1975.
 254. Hazlett, J. C., R. Dom, and G. F. Martin. Spino‐bulbar, spino‐thalamic and medial lemniscal connections in the American opossum, Didelphis marsupialis virginiana J. Comp. Neurol. 146: 95–118, 1972.
 255. Heath, C. J. The somatic sensory neurons of pericentral cortex. Int. Rev. Physiol. 17: 193–237, 1978.
 256. Heath, C. J., and E. G. Jones. An experimental study of ascending connections from the posterior group of thalamic nuclei in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 141: 397–426, 1971.
 257. Hellweg, F.‐C., W. Schultz, and O. D. Creutzfeldt. Extracellular and intracellular recordings from cat's cortical whisker projection area: thalamocortical response transformation. J. Neurophysiol. 40: 463–479, 1977.
 258. Hong, S. K., K.‐D. Kniffke, S. Mense, R. F. Schmidt, and M. Wendisch. Descending influences on the responses of spinocervical tract neurons to chemical stimulation of fine muscle afferents. J. Physiol. London 290: 129–140, 1979.
 259. Hongo, T., E. Jankowska, and A. Lundberg. Postsynaptic excitation and inhibition evoked from primary afferents in neurones of the spinocervical tract. J. Physiol. London 199: 569–592, 1968.
 260. Hongo, T., and H. Koike. Some aspects of synaptic organizations in the spinocervical tract cell in the cat. In: The Somatosensory System, edited by H. H. Kornhuber. Stuttgart, West Germany: Thieme, 1975, p. 218–226.
 261. Horch, K. W., P. R. Burgess, and D. Whitehorn. Ascending collaterals of cutaneous neurons in the fasciculus gracilis of the cat. Brain Res. 117: 1–17, 1976.
 262. Horrobin, D. F. The lateral cervical nucleus of the cat; an electrophysiological study. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 51: 351–371, 1966.
 263. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel. Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 158: 267–294, 1974.
 264. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 198: 1–59, 1977.
 265. Hwang, Y. C., E. V. Hinsman, and O. F. Roesel. Caliber spectra of fibers in the fasciculus gracilis of the cat cervical spinal cord: a quantitative electron microscopic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 162: 195–204, 1975.
 266. Hyvarinen, J. The Parietal Cortex of Monkey and Man. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1982.
 267. Hyvarinen, J., and A. Poranen. Movement‐sensitive and direction and orientation‐selective cutaneous receptive fields in the hand area of the post‐central gyrus in monkeys. J. Physiol. London 283: 523–537, 1978.
 268. Hyvarinen, J., and T. Poranen. Receptive field integration and submodality convergence in the hand area of the post‐central gyrus of the alert monkey. J. Physiol. London 283: 539–556, 1978.
 269. Hyvarinen, J., A. Poranen, and Y. Jokinen. Influence of attentive behavior on neuronal responses to vibration in primary somatosensory cortex of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 870–882, 1980.
 270. Hyvarinen, J., H. Sakata, W. H. Talbot, and V. B. Mountcastle. Neuronal coding by cortical cells of the frequency of oscillating peripheral stimuli. Science 162: 1130, 1968.
 271. Imig, T. J., and H. O. Adrian. Binaural columns in the primary field (A1) of cat auditory cortex. Brain Res. 138: 241–257, 1977.
 272. Imig, T. J., and J. F. Brugge. Sources and terminations of callosal axons related to binaural and frequency maps in primary auditory cortex of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 182: 637–660, 1978.
 273. Innocenti, G. M., and R. Caminiti. Postnatal shaping of callosal connections from sensory areas. Exp. Brain Res. 38: 381–394, 1980.
 274. Innocenti, G. M., and T. Manzoni. Response patterns of somatosensory cortical neurones to peripheral stimuli. An intracellular study. Arch. Ital. Biol. 110: 322–347, 1972.
 275. Innocenti, G. M., T. Manzoni, and G. Spidalieri. Peripheral and transcallosal reactivity of neurones within SI and SII cortical areas. Segmental divisions. Arch. Ital. Biol. 110: 415–443, 1972.
 276. Iwamura, Y., E. P. Gardner, and W. A. Spencer. Geometry of the ventrobasal complex: functional significance in skin sensation. Brain Behav. Evol. 6: 185–202, 1972.
 277. Iwamura, Y., and S. Inubushi. Regional diversity in excitatory and inhibitory receptive‐field organization of cat thalamic ventrobasal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 910–919, 1974.
 278. Iwamura, Y., and S. Inubushi. Functional organization of receptive fields in thalamic ventrobasal neurons examined by neuronal response to iterative electrical stimulation of skin. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 920–926, 1974.
 279. Iwamura, Y., and M. Tanaka. Postcentral neurons in hand region of area 2: their possible role in the form discrimination of tactile objects. Brain Res. 150: 662–666, 1978.
 280. Jabbur, S. J., and N. R. Banna. Presynaptic inhibition of cuneate transmission by widespread cutaneous inputs. Brain Res. 10: 273–276, 1968.
 281. Jabbur, S. J., and N. R. Banna. Widespread cutaneous inhibition in dorsal column nuclei. J. Neurophysiol. 33: 616–624, 1970.
 282. Jabbur, S. J., F. A. Harris, M. A. Biedenbach, R. W. Morse, and A. L. Towe. Cerebral modulation of neuronal excitability in the cuneate nucleus of the macaque monkey. In: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, edited by J. J. Bonica and D. Albe‐Fessard. New York: Raven, 1976, vol. 1, p. 461–468.
 283. Jabbur, S. J., and A. L. Towe. Cortical excitation of neurons in dorsal column nuclei of cat, including an analysis of pathways. J. Neurophysiol. 24: 499–509, 1961.
 284. Jacobsen, S., and J. Q. Trojanowski. Prefrontal granular cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Interhemispheric cortical afferents. Brain Res. 132: 235–246, 1977.
 285. Jane, J. A., and D. M. Schroeder. A comparison of dorsal column nuclei and spinal afferents in the European hedgehog (Erinaceus europeaus) Exp. Neurol. 30: 1–17, 1971.
 286. Jänig, W., T. Schoultz, and W. A. Spencer. Temporal and spatial parameters of excitation and afferent inhibition in cuneothalamic relay neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 40: 822–835, 1977.
 287. Jänig, W., W. A. Spencer, and S. G. Younkin. Spatial and temporal features of afferent inhibition of thalamocortical relay cells. J. Neurophysiol. 42: 1450–1460, 1979.
 288. Jankowska, E., J. Rastad, and J. Westman. Intracellular application of horseradish peroxidase and its light and electron microscopical appearance in spinocervical tract cells. Brain Res. 105: 557–562, 1976.
 289. Jankowska, E., J. Rastad, and P. Zarzecki. Segmental and supraspinal input to cells of origin of non‐primary fibres in the feline dorsal columns. J. Physiol. London 290: 185–200, 1979.
 290. Jarvilehto, T. Neural basis of cutaneous sensations analyzed by microelectrode measurements from human peripheral nerves—a review. Scand. J. Psychol. 18: 348–359, 1977.
 291. Jeanmonod, D., F. L. Rice, and H. Van Der Loos. Mouse somatosensory cortex: alterations in the barrelfield following receptor injury at different early postnatal ages. Neuroscience 6: 1503–1535, 1981.
 292. Jenny, A. B. Commissural projections of the cortical hand motor area in monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 188: 137–145, 1979.
 293. Johansson, H., and H. Silfvenius. Axon‐collateral activation by dorsal spinocerebellar tract fibres of group I relay cells of nucleus Z in the cat medulla oblongata. J. Physiol. London 265: 341–369, 1977.
 294. Johansson, H., and H. Silfvenius. Input from ipsilateral proprio‐ and exteroceptive hind limb afferents to nucleus Z of the cat medulla oblongata. J. Physiol. London 265: 371–393, 1977.
 295. Johansson, H., and H. Silfvenius. Connexions from large, ipsilateral hind limb muscle and skin afferents to the rostral main cuneate nucleus and to the nucleus X region in the cat. J. Physiol. London 265: 395–428, 1977.
 296. Johansson, R. S., and A. B. Vallbo. Detection of tactile stimuli: thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. J. Physiol. London 297: 405–422, 1979.
 297. Johnson, J. I., Jr., W. I. Welker, and B. H. Pubols, Jr. Somatotopic organization of raccoon dorsal column nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol. 132: 1–44, 1968.
 298. Johnson, K. O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 48–72, 1974.
 299. Johnson, K. O. Sensory discrimination: decision process. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1771–1792, 1980.
 300. Johnson, K. O. Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1793–1815, 1980.
 301. Johnson, K. O., and G. D. Lamb. Neural mechanisms of tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by Braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. J. Physiol. London 310: 117–144, 1981.
 302. Johnson, K. O., and J. R. Phillips. Tactile‐spatial resolution. I. Two‐point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1177–1191, 1981.
 303. Jones, E. G. Commissural, cortico‐cortical and thalamic “columns” in the somatic sensory cortex of primates. Exp. Brain Res. Suppl. 1: 309–316, 1976.
 304. Jones, E. G. Anatomy of cerebral cortex: columnar input‐output relations. In: The Cerebral Cortex, edited by F. O. Schmitt, F. G. Worden, G. Adelman, and S. G. Dennis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981, p. 199–225.
 305. Jones, E. G. The columnar basis of cortical circuitry. In: The Clinical Neurosciences. Neurobiology, edited by W. D. Willis, Jr. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1981.
 306. Jones, E. G. Functional subdivision and synaptic organization of the mammalian thalamus. Int. Rev. Physiol. 25: 173–245 1981.
 307. Jones, E. G., and H. Burton. Cytoarchitecture and somatic sensory connectivity of thalamic nuclei other than the ventrobasal complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 154: 395–432, 1974.
 308. Jones, E. G., and H. Burton. Areal differences in the laminar distribution of thalamic afferents in cortical fields of the insular, parietal and temporal regions of primates. J. Comp. Neurol. 168: 197–247, 1976.
 309. Jones, E. G., H. Burton, and R. Porter. Commissural and cortico‐cortical “columns” in the somatic sensory cortex of primates. Science 190: 572–574, 1975.
 310. Jones, E. G., J. D. Coulter, and S. H. C. Hendry. Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 181: 291–347, 1978.
 311. Jones, E. G., J. D. Coulter, and S. P. Wise. Commissural columns in the sensory‐motor cortex of monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 188: 113–135, 1979.
 312. Jones, E. G., and D. P. Friedman. Projection pattern of functional components of thalamic ventrobasal complex on monkey somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 48: 521–544, 1982.
 313. Jones, E. G., D. P. Friedman, and S. H. C. Hendry. Thalamic basis of place‐ and modality‐specific columns in monkey somatosensory cortex: a correlative anatomical and physiological study. J. Neurophysiol. 48: 545–568, 1982.
 314. Jones, E. G., and R. T. Leavitt. Retrograde axonal transport and the demonstration of non‐specific projections to the cerebral cortex and striatum from thalamic intralaminar nuclei in the rat, cat, and monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 154: 349–378, 1974.
 315. Jones, E. G., and R. Porter. What is area 3a? Brain Res. 203: 1–43, 1980.
 316. Jones, E. G., and T. P. S. Powell. The projection of the somatic sensory cortex upon the thalamus in the cat. Brain Res. 10: 369–391, 1968.
 317. Jones, E. G., and T. P. S. Powell. Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. I. Ipsilateral connections. Brain 92: 477–502, 1969.
 318. Jones, E. G., and T. P. S. Powell. Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Contralateral connections. Brain 92: 717–730, 1969.
 319. Jones, E. G., and T. P. S. Powell. Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. III. Thalamic connexions. Brain 93: 37–56, 1970.
 320. Jones, E. G., and S. P. Wise. Size, laminar and columnar distribution of efferent cells in the sensory‐motor cortex of monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 175: 391–438, 1977.
 321. Jones, E. G., S. P. Wise, and J. D. Coulter. Differential thalamic relationships of sensory‐motor and parietal cortical fields in monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 183: 833–881, 1979.
 322. Juliano, S. L., P. J. Hand, and B. L. Whitsel. Patterns of increased metabolic activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys Macaco fascicularis, subjected to controlled cutaneous stimulation: a 2‐deoxyglucose study. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1260–1284, 1981.
 323. Kaas, J. H. What, if anything, is SI? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. Physiol. Rev. 63: 206–231, 1983.
 324. Kaas, J. H., M. M. Merzenich, and H. P. Killacky. The reorganization of the somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve damage in adult and developing animals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 6: 325–356, 1983.
 325. Kaas, J. H., R. J. Nelson, M. Sur, C. S. Lin, and M. M. Merzenich. Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. Science 204: 521–523, 1979.
 326. Kaas, J. H., R. J. Nelson, M. Sur, and M. M. Merzenich. Organization of somatosensory cortex in primates. In: The Organization of the Cerebral Cortex, edited by F. O. Schmitt, F. G. Worden, G. Adelman, and S. G. Dennis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
 327. Kaas, J. H., M. Sur, and J. T. Wall. Modular segregation in monkey somatosensory cortex. Trends Neurosci., 1981.
 328. Kalahan, A. M., R. H. Ray, L. V. Carson, C. E. Massey, and G. S. Doetsch. Functional reorganization of adult raccoon somatosensory cerebral cortex following neonatal digit amputation. Brain Res. 223: 152–159, 1981.
 329. Kalaska, J., and B. Pomeranz. Chronic paw denervation causes an age‐dependent appearance of novel responses from forearm “paw cortex” of kittens and adult cats. J. Neurophysiol. 42: 618–633, 1979.
 330. Kalaska, J., and B. Pomeranz. Chronic peripheral nerve injuries alter the somatotopic organization of the cuneate nucleus in kittens. Brain Res. 236: 35–47, 1982.
 331. Kalil, K. Projections of the cerebellar and dorsal column nuclei upon the inferior olive in the rhesus monkey: an auto‐radiographic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 188: 43–62, 1979.
 332. Kalil, K. Projections of the cerebellar and dorsal column nuclei upon the thalamus of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 195: 25–50, 1981.
 333. Keller, J. H., and P. J. Hand. Dorsal root projections to nucleus cuneatus of the cat. Brain Res. 20: 1–17, 1970.
 334. Kenshalo, D. R., Jr., G. J. Giesler, Jr., R. B. Leonard, and W. D. Willis. Responses of neurons in primate ventral posterior lateral nucleus to noxious stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1594–1614, 1980.
 335. Kenshalo, D. R., Jr., and W. D. Willis. Laminar distribution of spinothalamic tract cells in the primate lumbosacral spinal cord. Anat. Rec. 190: 443, 1978.
 336. Kerr F. W. L. The ventral spinothalamic tract and other ascending systems of the ventral funiculus of the spinal cord. J. Comp. Neurol. 159: 335–356, 1975.
 337. Kerr, F. W. L. A new concept of the spinothalamic system. Anat. Rec. 190: 443–444, 1978.
 338. Kerr, F. W. L., and H. H. Lippman. The primate spinothalamic tract as demonstrated by anterolateral cordotomy and commissural myelotomy. In: Advances in Neurology, edited by J. J. Bonica. New York: Raven, 1974, vol. 4, p. 147–156. (Int. Symp. Pain.)
 339. Killacky, H. P., G. O. Ivy, and T. S. Cunningham. Anomalous organization of SMI somatotopic map consequent to vibrissae removal in the newborn rat. Brain Res. 155: 136–140, 1978.
 340. Kircher, C., and H. Ha. The nucleus cervicalis lateralis in primates, including the human. Anat. Rec. 160: 376, 1968.
 341. Kitai, S. T., H. Ha, and F. Morin. Lateral cervical nucleus of the dog: anatomical and microelectrode studies. Am. J. Physiol. 209: 307–311, 1965.
 342. Kitai, S. T., and J. Weinberg. Tactile discrimination study of the dorsal column‐medial lemniscal system and spino‐cervico‐thalamic tract in cat. Exp. Brain Res. 6: 234–246, 1968.
 343. Kleist, K. Handbuch der ärztlichen Erfahrungen im Weltkriege, edited by O. von Schjerning. Leipzig, Germany: Barth, 1934, vol. 4, pt 2.
 344. Knibestol, M. Stimulus‐response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. London 245: 63–80, 1975.
 345. Knibestol, M., and A. B. Vallbo. Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. J. Physiol. London 300: 251–267, 1980.
 346. Kniffki, K.‐D., S. Mense, and R. F. Schmidt. The spinocervical tract as a possible pathway for muscular nociception. J. Physiol. Paris 73: 359–366, 1977.
 347. Kornhuber, H. J., and J. C. Aschoff. Somatisch‐vestibulaire Integration an Neuronen des motorischen Cortex. Naturwissenschaften 51: 62–63, 1964.
 348. Kosar, E., and P. J. Hand. First somatosensory cortical columns and associated neuronal clusters of nucleus ventralis posterolateralis of the cat: an anatomical demonstration. J. Comp. Neurol. 198: 515–539, 1981.
 349. Krishnamurti, A., F. Sanides, and W. I. Welker. Microelectrode mapping of modality‐specific somatic sensory cerebral neocortex in slow loris. Brain Behav. Evol. 13: 267–283, 1976.
 350. Kruger, L. The Dorsal Column System of the Spinal Cord: Its Anatomy, Physiology, Phylogeny, and Sensory Function. Los Angeles: UCLA Brain Information Service, 1973, p. 1–179.
 351. Kruger, L., R. Siminoff, and P. Witkovsky. Single neuron analysis of dorsal column nuclei and spinal nucleus of trigeminal in cat. J. Neurophysiol. 24: 333–349, 1961.
 352. Kuhn, R. A. Topographical pattern of cutaneous sensibility in the dorsal column nuclei of the cat. Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc. 74: 227, 1949.
 353. Kuno, M., E. J. Muñoz‐martinez, and M. Randić. Sensory inputs to neurones in Clarke's column from muscle, cutaneous and joint receptors. J. Physiol. London 228: 327–342, 1973.
 354. Kunzle, H. Alternating afferent zones of high and low axon terminal density within the macaque motor cortex. Brain Res. 106: 365–370, 1976.
 355. Kuru, M. Sensory Paths in the Spinal Cord and the Brain Stem of Man. Tokyo: Sogensya, 1949.
 356. Kuypers, H. G. J. M., and D. G. Lawrence. Cortical projections to the red nucleus and the brain stem in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 4: 151–188, 1967.
 357. Kuypers, H. G. J. M., and J. D. Tuerk. The distribution of the cortical fibres within the nuclei cuneatus and gracilis in the cat. J. Anat. 98: 143–162, 1964.
 358. lamotte, R. H., and V. B. Mountcastle. The capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate between vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychophysical measurements. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 539–559, 1975.
 359. Landgren, S., A. Nordwall, and C. Wengström. The location of the thalamic relay in the spino‐cervico‐lemniscal path. Acta Physiol. Scand. 65: 164–175, 1965.
 360. Landgren, S., and H. Silfvenius. Projection to cerebral cortex of group I muscle afferents from the cat's hind limb. J. Physiol. London 200: 353–372, 1969.
 361. Landgren, S., and H. Silfvenius. Nucleus Z, the medullary relay in the projection path to the cerebral cortex of group I muscle afferents from the cat's hind limb. J. Physiol. London 218: 551–571, 1971.
 362. Landgren, S., H. Silfvenius, and D. Wolsk. Somatosensory paths to the second cortical projection area of the group I muscle afferents. J. Physiol. London 191: 543–559, 1967.
 363. Lang, W., J. A. Buttner‐ennever, and U. Buttner. Vestibular projections to monkey thalamus. Brain Res. 177: 3–17, 1979.
 364. Laskin, S. E., and W. A. Spencer. Cutaneous masking. I. Psychophysical observations on interactions of multipoint stimuli in man. J. Neurophysiol. 42: 1048–1060, 1979.
 365. Laskin, S. E., and W. A. Spencer. Cutaneous masking. II. Geometry of excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields of single units in somatosensory cortex of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 42: 1061–1082, 1979.
 366. Leinonen, L., J. Hyvarinen, G. Nyman, and I. Linnankoski. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 34: 299–320, 1979.
 367. Lemon, R. N. Short latency peripheral inputs in the motor cortex of conscious monkeys. Brain Res. 161: 150–155, 1979.
 368. Lemon, R. N. Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers. J. Physiol. London 311: 497–519, 1981.
 369. Lemon, R. N. Variety of functional organization within the monkey motor cortex. J. Physiol. London 311: 521–540, 1981.
 370. Lemon, R. N., J. A. Hanby, and R. Porter. Relationship between the activity of precentral neurones during active and passive movements in conscious monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 194: 341–373, 1976.
 371. Lemon, R. N., and R. Porter. Afferent input to movement‐related precentral neurones in conscious monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 194: 313–339, 1976.
 372. Lemon, R. N., and J. Van Der Burg. Short‐latency peripheral inputs to thalamic neurones projecting to the motor cortex in the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 36: 445–462, 1979.
 373. Levante, A., Y. Lamour, and D. Albe‐fessard. Localisation dans la couche V de Rexed de cellules d'origine d'un faisceau spino‐thalamique croisé chez le macaque. C. R. Acad. Sci. D Paris 276: 1589–1592, 1973.
 374. Levitt, M., M. Carreras, C. N. Liu, and W. W. Chambers. Pyramidal and extrapyramidal modulation of somatosensory activity in gracile and cuneate nuclei. Arch. Ital. Biol. 102: 197–229, 1964.
 375. Levitt, M., and J. Levitt. Sensory hind limb representation in the SmI cortex of the cat after spinal tractotomies. Exp. Neurol. 22: 276–302, 1968.
 376. Levitt, M., and R. Schwartzman. Spinal sensory tracts and two‐point tactile sensitivity. Anat. Rec. 154: 377, 1966.
 377. Liedgren, S. R. C., A. C. Milne, A. M. Rubin, D. W. F. Schwarz, and R. D. Tomlinson. Representation of vestibular afferents in somatosensory thalamic nuclei of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) J. Neurophysiol. 39: 601–602, 1976.
 378. Lloyd, D. P. C., and A. K. MCintyre. Dorsal column conduction of group I muscle afferent impulses and their relay through Clarke's column. J. Neurophysiol. 13: 39–54, 1950.
 379. Loe, P. R., B. L. Whitsel, D. A. Dreyer, and C. B. Metz. Body representation in ventrobasal thalamus of macaque: a single‐unit analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 40: 1339–1355, 1977.
 380. Lucier, G. E., D. C. Rüegg, and M. Wiesendanger. Responses of neurones in motor cortex and in area 3A to controlled stretches of forelimb muscles in cebus monkeys. J. Physiol. London 251: 833–853, 1975.
 381. Lundberg, A., and U. Norsell. Spinal afferent pathway of the tactile placing reaction. Experientia 16: 123, 1960.
 382. Lundberg, A., and O. Oscarsson. Three ascending spinal pathways in the dorsal part of the lateral funiculus. Acta Physiol. Scand. 51: 1–16, 1961.
 383. Maendly, R., D. G. Rüegg, M. Wiesendanger, R. Wiesendanger, J. Lagowska, and B. Hess. Thalamic relay for group I muscle afferents of forelimb nerves in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 901–917, 1981.
 384. Magherini, P. C., O. Pompeiano and J. J. Seguin. The response of nucleus Z neurons to sinusoidal stretch of hindlimb extensor muscles. Brain Res. 73: 343–349, 1974.
 385. Magherini, P. C., O. Pompeiano, and J. J. Seguin. Responses of nucleus Z neurons to vibration of hindlimb extensor muscles in the decerebrate cat. Arch. Ital. Biol. 113: 150–187, 1975.
 386. Maiorov, V. I., E. I. Savchenko, and B. I. Kotlyar. Transformation of the afferent tactile signal into a motor command in the cat motor cortex. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 10: 374–381, 1980.
 387. Mann, M. D. Clarke's column and the dorsal spinocerebellar tract: review. Brain Behav. Evol. 7: 34–83, 1973.
 388. Manson, J. The somatosensory cortical projections of single nerve cells in the thalamus of the cat. Brain Res. 12: 489–492, 1969.
 389. Manzoni, T., P. Barbaresi, E. Bellardinelli, and R. Caminiti. Callosal projections from the two body midlines. Exp. Brain Res. 39: 1–9, 1980.
 390. Manzoni, T., R. Caminiti, G. Spidalieri, and E. Morelli. Anatomical and functional aspects of the associative projections from somatic area SI to SII. Exp. Brain Res. 34: 453–470, 1979.
 391. Marshall, J. Sensory disturbances in cortical wounds with special reference to pain. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 14: 187–198, 1951.
 392. Marshall, W. H., C. N. Woolsey, and P. Bard. Cortical representation of tactile sensibility as indicated by cortical potentials. Science 85: 388–390, 1937.
 393. Martin, A. R. Junctional transmission II. Presynaptic mechanisms. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System, edited by J. M. Brookhart and V. B. Mountcastle. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1977, sect. 1, vol. I, pt. 1, chapt. 10, p. 329–355.
 394. Mash, C. C., I. G. Worden, and K. J. Berkley. Projections of the lateral cervical nucleus and the dorsal column nuclei to regions adjacent to and within then. ventralis posterolateralis of the cat thalamus. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2: 943, 1976.
 395. mccomas, A. J. Responses of the rat dorsal column system to mechanical stimulation of the hindpaw. J. Physiol. London 166: 435–448, 1963.
 396. MCkenna, T. M., B. L. Whitsel, and D. A. Dreyer. Anterior parietal cortical topographic organization in macaque monkey: a revaluation. J. Neurophysiol. 48: 289–317, 1982.
 397. Mehler, W. R., M. E. Feferman, and W. H. J. Nauta. Ascending axon degeneration following anterolateral cordotomy. Brain 83: 718–750, 1960.
 398. Melzack, R., and J. A. Bridges. Dorsal column contributions to motor behavior. Exp. Neurol. 33: 53–68, 1971.
 399. Melzack, R., and S. E. Southmayd. Dorsal column contributions to anticipatory motor behavior. Exp. Neurol. 43: 274–281, 1974.
 400. Merrill, E. G., and P. D. Wall. Plasticity of connection in the adult nervous system. In: Neuronal Plasticity, edited by C. W. Cotman. New York: Raven, 1978.
 401. Merzenich, M. M., and T. Harrington. The sense of flutter‐vibration evoked by stimulation of the hairy skin of primates: comparison of human sensory capacity with the responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 9: 236–260, 1969.
 402. Merzenich, M. M., and J. H. Kaas. Reorganization of somatosensory cortex in mammals following peripheral nerve injury. Trends Neurosci. In press.
 403. Merzenich, M. M., J. H. Kaas, M. Sur, and C. S. Lin. Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in ‘SI’ in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus) J. Comp. Neurol. 181: 41–73, 1978.
 404. Merzenich, M. M., J. H. Kaas, J. Wall, R. J. Nelson, M. Sur, and D. Felleman. Topographic reorganization of somatosensory cortical areas 3B and 1 in adult monkeys following restricted deafferentation. Neuroscience 8: 33–55, 1983.
 405. Merzenich, M. M., J. H. Kaas, J. T. Wall, M. Sur, R. J. Nelson, and D. J. Felleman. Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3B and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. In press.
 406. Merzenich, M. M., R. J. Nelson, J. H. Kaas, M. P. Stryker, M. Sur, J. T. Wall, J. M. Zook, M. S. Cynader, D. J. Felleman, and A. Schoppmann. Variability in hand surface representations in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. In press.
 407. Merzenich, M. M., R. J. Nelson, M. P. Stryker, M. Cynader, A. Schoppmann, and J. M. Zook. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. In press.
 408. Metzler, J., and P. S. Marks. Functional changes in cat somatic sensory‐motor cortex during short‐term reversible epidemal blocks. Brain Res. 177: 379–383, 1979.
 409. Middlebrooks, J. C., R. W. Dykes, and M. M. Merzenich. Binaural response‐specific bands in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: topographical organization orthogonal to iso‐frequency contours. Brain Res. 181: 31–48, 1980.
 410. Millar, J. The topography and receptive fields of ventroposterolateral thalamic neurons excited by afferents projecting through the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 41: 303–313, 1973.
 411. Millar, J., and A. I. Basbaum. Topography of the projection of the body surface of the cat to cuneate and gracile nuclei. Exp. Neurol. 49: 281–290, 1975.
 412. Millar, J., A. I. Basbaum, and P. D. Wall. Restructuring of the somatotopic map and appearance of abnormal neuronal activity in the gracile nucleus after partial deafferentation. Exp. Neurol. 50: 658–672, 1976.
 413. Mizuno, N., K. Nakano, M. Imaizumi, and M. Okamoto. The lateral cervical nucleus of the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata) J. Comp. Neurol. 129: 375–384, 1967.
 414. Molenaar, I., A. Rustioni, and H. G. J. M. Kuypers. The location of cells of origin of the fibers in the ventral and lateral funiculus of the cat's lumbo‐sacral cord. Brain Res. 78: 239–254, 1974.
 415. Molinari, H. H., and R. S. Klein. Dorsal column nuclei and lateral cervical nucleus projections to the dorsal accessory olive of cats (Abstract). Anat. Rec. 202: 131A, .1982.
 416. Morin, F. A new spinal pathway for cutaneous impulses. Am. J. Physiol. 183: 245–252, 1955.
 417. Morin, F., and J. V. Catalano. Central connections of a cervical nucleus (nucleus cervicalis lateralis of the cat). J. Comp. Neurol. 103: 17–32, 1955.
 418. Morrison, A. R., P. J. Hand, and J. O'donoghue. Contrasting projections from the posterior and ventrobasal thalamic nuclear complexes to the anterior ectosylvian gyrus of the cat. Brain Res. 21: 115–121, 1970.
 419. Mountcastle, V. B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 20: 408–434, 1957.
 420. Mountcastle, V. B. The neural replication of sensory events in the somatic afferent system. In: Brain and Conscious Experience, edited by J. C. Eccles. New York: Springer‐Verlag, 1966. (Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, Study Week, Sept. 1964.)
 421. Mountcastle, V. B. The problem of sensing and the neural coding of sensory events. In: The Neurosciences: An Intensive Study Program, edited by F. O. Schmitt, G. Quarton, and T. Melnuchuk. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press, 1967.
 422. Mountcastle, V. B. An organizing principle for cerebral function: the unit module and the distributed system. In: The Mindful Brain: Cortical Organization and the Group Selective Theory of Higher Brain Function, edited by G. M. Edelman and V. B. Mountcastle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978, p. 7–50.
 423. Mountcastle, V. B. Neural mechanisms in somesthesis. In: Medical Physiology, edited by V. B. Mountcastle. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1980, vol. 1, p. 348.
 424. Mountcastle, V. B., P. W. Davies, and A. L. Berman. Response properties of neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex to peripheral stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 20: 374–407, 1957.
 425. Mountcastle, V. B., and E. Henneman. Pattern of tactile representation in thalamus of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 12: 85–100, 1949.
 426. Mountcastle, V. B., and E. Henneman. The representation of tactile sensibility in the thalamus of the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 97: 409–440, 1952.
 427. Mountcastle, V. B., R. H. Lamotte, and G. Carli. Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 122–136, 1972.
 428. Mountcastle, V. B., J. C. Lynch, A. Georgopoulos, H. Sakata, and C. Acuna. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 871–908, 1975.
 429. Mountcastle, V. B., G. F. Poggio, and G. Werner. The relation of thalamic cell response to peripheral stimuli varied over an intensive continuum. J. Neurophysiol. 26: 807–834, 1963.
 430. Mountcastle, V. B., G. F. Poggio, and G. Werner. The neural transformation of the sensory stimulus at the cortical input level of the somatic afferent system. In: Information Processing in the Nervous System, edited by R. Gerard. Amsterdam: Excerpta Med., 1964, p. 196–217.
 431. Mountcastle, V. B., and T. P. S. Powell. Central nervous mechanisms subserving position sense and kinesthesis. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105: 173–200, 1959.
 432. Mountcastle, V. B., and T. P. S. Powell. Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105: 201–232, 1959.
 433. Mountcastle, V. B., and J. E. Rose. Activity of single neurons of the somatic sensory nuclear complex of the thalamus. Federation Proc. 11: 109, 1952.
 434. Mountcastle, V. B., W. H. Talbot, I. Darian‐Smith, and H. H. Kornhuber. A neural basis for the sense of flutter‐vibration. Science 155: 597–600, 1967.
 435. Mountcastle, V. B., W. H. Talbot, and H. H. Kornhuber. The neural transformation of mechanical stimuli delivered to the monkey's hand. In: Ciba Foundation Symposium on Touch, Heat and Pain. London: Churchill, 1966, p. 325–351.
 436. Mountcastle V. B., W. H. Talbot, H. Sakata, and J. Hyvärinen. Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. J. Neurophysiol. 32: 452–484, 1969.
 437. Murphy, J. T., H. C. Kwan, W. A. Mackay, and Y. C. Wong. Activity of primate precentral neurons during voluntary movements triggered by visual signals. Brain Res. 236: 429–249, 1982.
 438. Murphy, J. T., H. C. Kwan, and Y. C. Wong. Differential effects of reciprocal wrist torques on responses of somatotopically identified neurons of precentral cortex in awake primates. Brain Res. 172: 329–337, 1979.
 439. Murphy, J. T., Y.‐C. Wong, and H. C. Kwan. Afferent‐efferent linkages in motor cortex for single forelimb muscles. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 990–1014, 1975.
 440. Murray, E. A., and J. D. Coulter. Supplementary sensory area. The medial parietal cortex in the monkey. In: Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas, edited by C. N. Woolsey. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1, p. 167–195.
 441. Myers, D. A., G. Hostetter, C. M. Bourassa, and J. E. Swett. Dorsal columns in sensory detection. Brain Res. 70: 350–355, 1974.
 442. Nagata, T., and L. Kruger. Tactile neurons of the superior colliculus of the cat: input and physiological properties. Brain Res. 174: 19–37, 1979.
 443. Nathan, P. W., and M. C. Smith. Fasciculi proprii of the spinal cord in man: review of present knowledge. Brain 82: 610–668, 1959.
 444. Nelson, R. J., and J. H. Kaas. Connections of the ventroposterior nucleus of the thalamus with the body surface representations in cortical areas 3b and 1 of the cynomolgus macaque, (Macaca fascicularis) J. Comp. Neurol. 199: 29–64, 1981.
 445. Nelson, R. J., M. Sur, D. J. Felleman, and J. H. Kaas. Representations of the body surface in postcentral parietal cortex of Macaca fascicularis J. Comp. Neurol. 192: 611–643, 1980.
 446. Nelson, R. J., M. Sur, and J. H. Kaas. Multiple representations of the body surface in postcentral parietal cortex (S1) of the squirrel monkey. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 4: 45, 1978.
 447. Nijensohn, D. E., and F. W. L. Kerr. The ascending projections of the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord in the primate. J. Comp. Neurol. 161: 459–470, 1975.
 448. Noback, C. R., and J. E. Shriver. Encephalization and the lemniscal systems during phylogeny. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 167: 118–128, 1969.
 449. Nord, S. G. Somatotopic organization in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, the dorsal column nuclei and related structures in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 130: 343–356, 1967.
 450. Norrsell, U. An evoked potential study of spinal pathways projecting to the cerebral somatosensory areas in the dog. Exp. Brain Res. 2: 261–268, 1966.
 451. Norrsell, U. The spinal afferent pathways of conditioned reflexes to cutaneous stimuli in the dog. Exp. Brain Res. 2: 269–282, 1966.
 452. Norrsell, U. Afferent pathways of tactile conditioned reflex after cortical somatosensory ablations. Physiol. Behav. 2: 83–86, 1967.
 453. Norrsell, U. Behavioral studies of the somatosensory system. Physiol. Rev. 60: 327–354, 1980.
 454. Norrsell, U., and P. Voorhoeve. Tactile pathways from the hindlimb to the cerebral cortex in cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 54: 9–17, 1962.
 455. Norrsell, U., and E. R. Wolpow. An evoked potential study of different pathways from the hindlimb to the somatosensory areas in the cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 66: 19–33, 1966.
 456. Ochoa, J., and E. Torebjork. Sensations evoked by intra‐neural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptive units innervating the human hand. J. Physiol. London. In press.
 457. Odutola, A. B. Patterns and fields of dorsal column fiber terminals in the cuneo‐gracile nuclei of the rat. Exp. Neurol. 57: 112–120, 1977.
 458. Oscarsson, O., and I. Rosen. Short‐latency projections to the cat's cerebral cortex from skin and muscle afferents in the contralateral forelimb. J. Physiol. London 182: 164–184, 1966.
 459. Oswaldo‐cruz, E., and C. Kidd. Functional properties of neurons in the lateral cervical nucleus of the cat. J. Neuro‐physiol. 27: 1–14, 1964.
 460. Paul, R. L., H. Goodman, and M. M. Merzenich. Alterations in mechanoreceptor input to Brodmann's areas 1 and 3 of the postcentral hand area of Macaca mulatta after nerve section and regeneration. Brain Res. 36: 1–19, 1972.
 461. Paul, R. L., M. Merzenich, and H. Goodman. Representation of slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the hand in Brodmann's areas 3 and 1 of Macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 36: 229–249, 1972.
 462. Pearson, R. C. A., P. Brodal, K. C. Gatter, and T. P. S. Powell. The organization of the connections between the cortex and the claustrum in the monkey. Brain Res. 234: 435–441, 1982.
 463. Pearson, R. C. A., K. C. Gatter, P. Brodal, and T. P. S. Powell. The projection of the basal nucleus of Meynert upon the neocortex in the monkey. Brain Res. 259: 132–136, 1983.
 464. Perl, E. R., and D. G. Whitlock. Somatic stimuli exciting spinothalamic projections to thalamic neurons in cat and monkey. Exp. Neurol. 3: 256–296, 1961.
 465. Perl, E. R., D. G. Whitlock, and J. R. Gentry. Cutaneous projection to second‐order neurons of the dorsal column system. J. Neurophysiol. 25: 337–358, 1962.
 466. Petit, D., and P. R. Burgess. Dorsal column projection of receptors in cat hairy skin supplied by myelinated fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 31: 849–855, 1968.
 467. Phillips, J. R., and K. O. Johnson. Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1192–1203, 1981.
 468. Phillips, C. G., T. P. S. Powell, and M. Wiesendanger. Projection from low‐threshold muscle afferents of hand and forearm to area 3a of baboon's cortex. J. Physiol. London 21: 419–446, 1971.
 469. Pidoux, B., M. F. Diebler, C. Savy, E. Farkas, and R. Verley. Cortical organization of the postero‐medial barrel‐subfield in mice and its reorganization after destruction of vibrissal follicles after birth. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 6: 93–107, 1980.
 470. Poggio, G. F., and V. B. Mountcastle. A study of the functional contributions of the lemniscal and spinothalamic systems to somatic sensibility. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 106: 266–316, 1960.
 471. Poggio, G. F., and V. B. Mountcastle. The functional properties of ventrobasal thalamic neurons studied in unanesthetized monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 26: 775–806, 1963.
 472. Pompeiano, O., and A. Brodal. Spino‐vestibular fibres in the cat. An experimental study. J. Comp. Neurol. 108: 353–378, 1957.
 473. Porter, R. Influences of movement detectors on pyramidal tract neurons in primates. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 38: 121–137, 1976.
 474. Porter, R. Internal organization of the motor cortex for input‐output arrangements. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control, edited by V. B. Brooks. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1981, sect. 1, vol. II, pt. 2, chapt. 22, p. 1063–1081.
 475. Powell, T. P. S. The somatic sensory cortex. Br. Med. Bull. 33: 129–135, 1977.
 476. Powell, T. P. S., and V. B. Mountcastle. The cytoarchitecture of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey Macaca mulatta Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105: 108–131, 1959.
 477. Powell, T. P. S., and V. B. Mountcastle. Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105: 133–162, 1959.
 478. Price, D. D., R. L. Hayes, M. Ruda, and R. Dubner. Spatial and temporal transformations of input to spinothalamic tract neurons and their relation to somatic sensations. J. Neurophysiol. 41: 933–947, 1978.
 479. Price, D. D., and D. J. Mayer. Neurophysiological characterization of the anterolateral quadrant neurons subserving pain in M. mulatta Pain 1: 59–72, 1975.
 480. Pubols, B. H., jr., and L. M. Pubols. Somatic sensory representation in the thalamic ventrobasal complex of the Virginia opossum. J. Comp. Neurol. 127: 19–34, 1966.
 481. Pubols, L. M. Somatic sensory representation in the thalamic ventrobasal complex of the spider monkey (Ateles) Brain Behav. Evol. 1: 305–323, 1968.
 482. Pubols, L. M., and B. H. Pubols, Jr. Modality composition and functional characteristics of dorsal column mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the raccoon's forepaw. J. Neurophysiol. 36: 1023–1037, 1973.
 483. Puletti, F., and A. J. Blomquist. Single neuron activity in posterior columns of the human spinal cord. J. Neurosurg. 27: 255–259, 1967.
 484. Purpura, D. P. Intracellular studies of synaptic organization in the mammalian brain. In: Structure and Function of Synapses, edited by G. D. Pappas and D. P. Purpura. New York: Raven, 1972, p. 257–302.
 485. Rainey, W. T., and E. G. Jones. Spatial distribution of individual medial lemniscal axons in the thalamic ventrobasal complex of the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 49: 229–246, 1983.
 486. Rakic, P. Prenatal development of the visual system in rhesus monkey. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 278: 245–260, 1977.
 487. Rakic, P. Developmental events leading to laminar and areal organization of the neocortex. In: The Organization of the Cerebral Cortex, edited by F. O. Schmitt, F. G. Worden, G. Adelman, and S. G. Dennis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981, p. 7–28.
 488. Rakic, P., and P. Goldman‐rakic. Development and modifiability of the cerebral cortex. Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 20: 429–611, 1982.
 489. Randolph, M., and J. Semmes. Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 70: 55–70, 1970.
 490. Rasmusson, D. D. Reorganization of raccoon somatosensory cortex following removal of the fifth digit. J. Comp. Neurol. 205: 313–326, 1982.
 491. Rasmusson, D. D., R. W. Dykes, and P. B. Hoeltzell. Segregation of modality and submodality information in S1 cortex of cat. Brain Res. 166: 409–412, 1979.
 492. Rexed, B., and A. Brodal. The nucleus cervicalis lateralis. A spino‐cerebellar relay nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 14: 399–407, 1951.
 493. Rexed, B., and G. Strom. Afferent nervous connections of the lateral cervical nucleus. Acta Physiol. Scand. 25: 219–229, 1952.
 494. Roberts, T. S., and K. Akert. Insular and opercular cortex and its thalamic projection in Macaca mulatta. Schweiz Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr. 92: 1–43, 1963.
 495. Robinson, C. J., and H. Burton. Somatotopographic organization in the second somatosensory area of M. fascicularis J. Comp. Neurol. 192: 43–67, 1980.
 496. Robinson, C. J., and H. Burton. Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis J. Comp. Neurol. 192: 69–92, 1980.
 497. Robinson, C. J., and H. Burton. Somatic submodality distribution within the second somatosensory (SII), 7b, retroinsula, postauditory, and granular insula cortex of M. fascicularis J. Comp. Neurol. 192: 93–108, 1980.
 498. Rose, J. E., and V. B. Mountcastle. Activity of single neurons in the tactile thalamic region of the cat in response to a transient peripheral stimulus. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 94: 238–282, 1954.
 499. Rose, J. E., and V. B. Mountcastle. Touch and kinesthesis. In: Handbook of Physiology. Neurophysiology, edited by J. Field and H. W. Magoun. Washington, DC: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1959, sect. 1, vol. I, chapt. 17, p. 387–429.
 500. Rosen, I. Functional organization of group I activated neurones in the cuneate nucleus of the cat. Brain Res. 6: 770–772, 1967.
 501. Rosen, I. Localization in caudal brain stem and cervical spinal cord of neurones activated from forelimb group I afferents in the cat. Brain Res. 16: 55–71, 1969.
 502. Rosen, I. Afferent connexions to group I activated cells in the main cuneate nucleus of the cat. J. Physiol. London 205: 209–236, 1969.
 503. Rosen, I., and H. Asanuma. Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: input‐output relations. Exp. Brain Res. 14: 257–273, 1972.
 504. Rosen, I., and B. Sjolund. Organization of group I activated cells in the main and external cuneate nuclei of the cat: identification of muscle receptors. Exp. Brain Res. 16: 221–237, 1973.
 505. Rosen, I., and B. Sjolund. Organization of group I activated cells in the main and external cuneate nuclei of the cat: convergence patterns demonstrated by natural stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 16: 238–246, 1973.
 506. Rozsos, I. The synapses of Burdach's nucleus. Acta Morphol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 8: 105–109, 1957.
 507. Rustioni, A. Non‐primary afferents to the nucleus gracilis from the lumbar cord of the cat. Brain Res. 51: 81–95, 1973.
 508. Rustioni, A. Non‐primary afferents to the cuneate nucleus in the brachial dorsal funiculus of the cat. Brain Res. 75: 247–259, 1974.
 509. Rustioni, A. Spinal neurons project to the dorsal column nuclei of rhesus monkeys. Science 196: 656–658, 1977.
 510. Rustioni, A., N. L. Hayes, and S. O'neill. Dorsal column nuclei and ascending spinal afferents in macaques. Brain 102: 95–125, 1979.
 511. Rustioni, A., and A. B. Kaufman. Identification of cells or origin of non‐primary afferents to the dorsal coumn nuclei of the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 27: 1–14, 1977.
 512. Rustioni, A., and G. Macchi. Distribution of dorsal root fibers in the medulla oblongata of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 134: 113–126, 1968.
 513. Rustioni, A., and I. Molenaar. Dorsal column nuclei afferents in the lateral funiculus of the cat: distribution pattern and absence of sprouting after chronic deafferentation. Exp. Brain Res. 23: 1–12, 1975.
 514. Rustioni, A., and C. Sotelo. Synaptic organization of the nucleus gracilis of the cat. Experimental identification of dorsal root fibers and cortical afferents. J. Comp. Neurol. 155: 441–468, 1974.
 515. Sadjadpour, K., and A. Brodal. The vestibular nuclei in man. A morphological study in the light of experimental findings in the cat. J. Hirnforsch. 10: 299–323, 1968.
 516. Sakata, H. Somatic sensory responses of neurons in the parietal association area (area 5) in monkeys. In: The Somatosensory System, edited by H. H. Kornhuber. Stuttgart, West Germany: Thieme, 1975, p. 250–261.
 517. Sakata, H., and Y. Iwamura. Cortical processing of tactile information in the first somatosensory parietal association areas in the monkey. In: Active Touch, edited by G. Gordon. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1978, p. 55–72.
 518. Sakata, H., A. Takaoka, A. Kawarasaki, and H. Shibutani. Somatosensory properties of neurons in superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 64: 85–102, 1973.
 519. Scheibel, M. E., and A. B. Scheibel. Terminal axonal patterns in cat spinal cord. II. The dorsal horn. Brain Res. 9: 32–58, 1968.
 520. Schneider, R. H., and R. L. Paul. Body representation in the anterolateral funiculus as reconstructed by percutaneous cordotomies for benign intractable pain. In: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, edited by J. J. Bonica and D. Albe‐Fessard. New York: Raven, 1976, vol. 1, p. 267–270.
 521. Schneider, R. J., A. T. Kulics, and T. B. Ducker. Proprioceptive pathways of the spinal cord. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 40: 417–433, 1977.
 522. Schroeder, D. M., and J. A. Jane. The intercollicular area of the inferior colliculus. Brain Behav. Evol. 13: 125–141, 1976.
 523. Schwartz, A. S., E. Eidelberg, P. Marchok, and A. Azulay. Tactile discrimination in the monkey after section of the dorsal funiculus and lateral lemniscus. Exp. Neurol. 37: 582–596, 1972.
 524. Schwartzman, R. J., and M. D. Bogdonoff. Behavioral and anatomical analysis of vibration sensibility. Exp. Neurol. 20: 43–51, 1968.
 525. Schwartzman, R. J., and M. D. Bogdonoff. Proprioception and vibration sensibility discrimination in the absence of the posterior columns. Arch. Neurol. Chicago 20: 349–353, 1969.
 526. Schwarz, D. W. F., and J. M. Fredrickson. Tactile direction sensitivity of area 2 oral neurons in the rhesus monkey cortex. Brain Res. 27: 397–401, 1971.
 527. Schwarz, D. W. F., and J. M. Fredrickson. Rhesus monkey vestibular cortex: a bimodal primary projection field. Science 172: 289–291, 1971.
 528. Shanks, M. F., A. J. Rockel, and T. P. S. Powell. The commissural fibre connections of the primary sensory cortex. Brain Res. 98: 166–171, 1975.
 529. Shimazu, H., N. Yanagisawa, and B. Garoutte. Corticopyramidal influences on thalamic somatosensory transmission in the cat. Jpn. J. Physiol. 15: 101–124, 1965.
 530. Shriver, J. E., B. M. Stein, and M. B. Carpenter. Central projections of spinal dorsal roots in the monkey. I. Cervical and upper thoracic. Am. J. Anat. 123: 27–74, 1968.
 531. Simons, D. J. Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. J. Neurophysiol. 41: 798–820, 1978.
 532. Smith, M. C. Retrograde cell changes in human spinal cord after anterolateral cordotomies. Location and identification after different periods of survival. In: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, edited by J. Y. Bonica and D. Albe‐Fessard. New York: Raven, 1976, vol. 1, p. 91–98.
 533. Sousa, A. P. B., E. Oswaldo‐Cruz, and R. Gattass. Somatotopic organization and response properties of neurons of the ventrobasal complex in the opossum. J. Comp. Neurol. 142: 231–247, 1971.
 534. Spencer, W. A. The physiology of supraspinal neurons in mammals. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System, Cellular Biology of Neurons, edited by E. R. Kandel. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1977, sect. 1, vol. I, pt. 2, chapt. 26, p. 969–1021.
 535. Spreafico, R., N. L. Hayes, and A. Rustioni. Thalamic projections to the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in cat: single and double retrograde tracer studies. J. Comp. Neurol. 203: 67–90, 1981.
 536. Sretavan, D., and R. W. Dykes. The organization of two cutaneous submodalities in the forearm region of area 3b of cat somatosensory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 213: 381–398, 1983.
 537. Steffen, H., and H. Van Der Loos. Early lesions of mouse vibrissal follicles: their influence on dendrite orientation in the cortical barrelfield. Exp. Brain Res. 40: 419–431, 1980.
 538. Stevens, S. S. Tactile vibration: change of exponent with frequency. Percept. Psychophys. 3: 223–228, 1968.
 539. Strick, P. L. Activity of ventrolateral thalamic neurons during arm movement. J. Neurophysiol. 39: 1032–1044, 1976.
 540. Strick, P. L., and J. B. Preston. Multiple representation in the primate motor cortex. Brain Res. 154: 366–370, 1978.
 541. Strick, P. L., and J. B. Preston. Sorting of somatosensory afferent information in primate motor cortex. Brain Res. 156: 364–370, 1978.
 542. Strick, P. L., and J. B. Preston. Multiple representation in the motor cortex: a new concept of input‐output organization for the forearm representation. In: Integration in the Nervous System, edited by H. Asanuma and V. J. Wilson. Tokyo: Igaku‐Shoin, 1979, p. 205–219.
 543. Strick, P. L., and J. B. Preston. Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. I. Motor output organization. J. Neurophysiol. 48: 139–149, 1982.
 544. Strick, P. L., and J. B. Preston. Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. J. Neurophysiol. 48: 150–159, 1982.
 545. Suga, N. Amplitude spectrum representation in the Doppler‐shifted‐CF processing area of the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science 196: 64–67, 1977.
 546. Sur, M. Receptive fields of neurons in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in monkeys. Brain Res. 198: 465–471, 1980.
 547. Sur, M., M. M. Merzenich, and J. H. Kaas. Magnification, receptive‐field area, and “hypercolumn” size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 44: 295–311, 1980.
 548. Sur, M., R. J. Nelson, and J. H. Kaas. The representation of the body surface in somatosensory area I of the grey squirrel. J. Comp. Neurol. 179: 425–449, 1978.
 549. Sur, M., R. J. Nelson, and J. H. Kaas. Representation of the body surface in somatic koniocortex in the Prosimian galago. J. Comp. Neurol. 189: 381–402, 1980.
 550. Sur, M., J. T. Wall, and J. H. Kaas. Modular segregation of functional cell classes within the postcentral somatosensory cortex of monkeys. Science 212: 1059–1061, 1981.
 551. Sur, M., R. E. Weller, and J. H. Kaas. Representation of the body surface in somatosensory area I of tree shrews, Tupaia glis J. Comp. Neurol. 194: 71–95, 1980.
 552. Sur, M., R. E. Weller, and J. H. Kaas. Physiological and anatomical evidence for a discontinuous representation of the trunk in SI of tree shrews. J. Comp. Neurol. 201: 135–147, 1981.
 553. Sweet, W. N., J. C. White, B. Selverston, and R. G. Nilges. Sensory responses from anterior roots and from surface and interior of spinal cord in man. Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc. 75: 165–169, 1950.
 554. Szentagothai, J. The neuron network of the cerebral cortex: a functional interpretation. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 201: 219–248, 1978.
 555. Takeuchi, A. Junctional transmission I. Postsynaptic mechanisms. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System, Cellular Biology of Neurons, edited by E. R. Kandel. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1977, sect. 1, vol. I, pt. 1, chapt. 9, p. 295–327.
 556. Talbot, W. H., I. Darian‐smith, H. H. Kornhuber, and V. B. Mountcastle. The sense of flutter‐vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 31: 301–334, 1968.
 557. Tanji, J., and S. P. Wise. Submodality distribution in sensorimotor cortex of the unanesthetized monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 467–481, 1981.
 558. Tasker, R. R., L. W. Organ, I. H. Rowe, and P. Hawrylyshyn. Human spinothalamic tract—stimulation mapping in the spinal cord and brain stem. In: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, edited by J. J. Bonica and D. Albe‐Fessard. New York: Raven, 1976, vol. 1, p. 252–257.
 559. Taub, A., and P. O. Bishop. The spinocervical tract: dorsal column linkage, conduction velocity, primary afferent spectrum. Exp. Neurol. 13: 1–21, 1965.
 560. Tomasulo, K. C., and R. Emmers. A spinocervical input to the gracile nucleus. Anat. Rec. 166: 390, 1970.
 561. Torebjork, H. E. Somesthesis. Stockholm: Wenner‐Gren Inst. In press.
 562. Torebjork, H. E., and J. L. Ochoa. Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 110: 445–447, 1980.
 563. Towe, A. L., and V. E. Amassian. Patterns of activity in single cortical units following stimulation of the digits in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 21: 292–311, 1958.
 564. Towe, A. L., and S. J. Jabbur. Cortical inhibition of neurons in dorsal column nuclei of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 24: 488–498, 1961.
 565. Towe, A. L., and T. T. Kennedy. Response of somatosensory cortical neurons to variation of stimulus intensity and locus. Exp. Neurol. 3: 570–587, 1961.
 566. Towe, A. L., H. D. Patton, and T. T. Kennedy. Response properties of neurons in the pericruciate cortex of the cat following electrical stimulation of the appendages. Exp. Neurol. 10: 325–344, 1964.
 567. Tracey, D. J., C. Asuma, E. G. Jones, and R. Porter. Thalamic relay to motor cortex: afferent pathways from brain stem, cerebellum, and spinal cord in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 44: 532–554, 1980.
 568. Trevino, D. L., and E. Carstens. Confirmation of the location of spinothalamic neurons in the cat and monkey by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Brain Res. 98: 177–182, 1975.
 569. Trevino, D. L., J. D. Coulter, and W. D. Willis. Location of cells of origin of spinothalamic tract in lumbar enlargement of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 36: 750–761, 1973.
 570. Trevino, D. L., W. D. Willis, and R. A. Maunz. Location of cells of origin of the spinothalamic tract in the cat (Abstract). Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. Sci., 25th, Munich, 1971.
 571. Truex, R., M. Taylor, and J. Smythe. The lateral cervical nucleus of the human spinal cord. Anat. Rec. 160: 443–461, 1968.
 572. Truex, R. C., M. J. Taylor, M. Q. Smythe, and P. L. Gildenberg. The lateral cervical nucleus of cat, dog and man. J. Comp. Neurol. 139: 93–104, 1970.
 573. Tsumoto, T. Characteristics of the thalamic ventrobasal relay neurons as a function of conduction velocities of medial lemniscal fibers. Exp. Brain Res. 21: 211–224, 1974.
 574. Tsumoto, T., and S. Nakamura. Inhibitory organization of the thalamic ventrobasal neurons with different peripheral representations. Exp. Brain Res. 21: 195–210, 1974.
 575. Tsumoto, T., S. Nakamura, and K. Iwama. Pyramidal tract control over cutaneous and kinesthetic sensory transmission in the cat thalamus. Exp. Brain Res. 22: 281–294, 1975.
 576. Uddenberg, N. Differential localization in dorsal funiculus of fibres originating from different receptors. Exp. Brain Res. 4: 367–376, 1968.
 577. Uddenberg, N. Functional organization of long, second‐order afferents in the dorsal funiculus. Exp. Brain Res. 4: 377–382, 1968.
 578. Valverde, F. The pyramidal tract in rodents. A study of its relations with the posterior column nuclei, dorsolateral reticular formation of the medulla oblongata and cervical spinal cord (Golgi and electron microscopic observations). Z. Zell‐forsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 71: 297–363, 1966.
 579. Van Der Loos, H. Barreloids in mouse somatosensory thalamus. Neurosci. Lett. 2: 1–6, 1976.
 580. Van Der Loos, H., and T. A. Woolsey. Somatosensory cortex: structural alterations following early injury to sense organs. Science 179: 395–398, 1973.
 581. Verrillo, R. T., A. Fraioli, and R. L. Smith. Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 6: 366–372, 1969.
 582. Vierck, C. J. Spinal pathways mediating limb position sense. Anat. Rec. 154: 437, 1966.
 583. Vierck, C. J., Jr. Alterations of spatio‐tactile discrimination after lesions of primate spinal cord. Brain Res. 58: 69–79, 1973.
 584. Vierck, C. J., Jr. Tactile movement detection and discrimination following dorsal column lesions in monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 20: 331–346, 1974.
 585. Vierck, C. J., Jr. Interpretations of the sensory and motor consequences of dorsal column lesions. In: Active Touch, edited by G. Gordon. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1978, p. 139–159.
 586. Vierck, C. J., Jr. Comparison of forelimb and hindlimb motor deficits following dorsal column section in monkeys. Brain Res. 146: 279–294, 1978.
 587. Vierck, C. J., jr., and M. M. Luck. Loss and recovery of reactivity to noxious stimuli in monkeys with primary spinothalamic cordotomies, followed by secondary and tertiary lesions of other cord sectors. Brain 102: 233–248, 1979.
 588. Waite, P. M., and B. G. Cragg. The peripheral and central changes resulting from cutting or crushing the afferent nerve supply to the whiskers. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 214: 191–211, 1982.
 589. Waite, P. M. E., and P. K. Taylor. Removal of whiskers in young rats causes functional changes in the cerebral cortex. Nature London 274: 600–604, 1978.
 590. Walberg, F. Axoaxonic contacts in the cuneate nucleus, probable basis for synaptic depolarization. Exp. Neurol. 13: 218–231, 1965.
 591. Walberg, F. The fine structure of the cuneate nucleus in normal cats and following interruption of afferent fibres—an electron microscopical study with particular reference to findings made in Glees and Nauta sections. Exp. Brain. Res. 2: 107–128, 1966.
 592. Waldron, H. A. The morphology of the lateral cervical nucleus in the hedgehog. Brain Res. 16: 301–306, 1969.
 593. Walker, A. E. The Primate Thalamus. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.
 594. Walker, A. E., and T. A. Weaver. The topical organization and termination of the fibers of the posterior columns in Macaca mulatta J. Comp. Neurol. 76: 145–158, 1942.
 595. Wall, P. D. The sensory and motor role of impulses travelling in the dorsal columns towards cerebral cortex. Brain 93: 505–524, 1970.
 596. Wall, P. D. Sensory role of impulses traveling in the dorsal columns. IEEE Trans. Man‐Machine Syst. 11: 39–44, 1970.
 597. Wall, P. D. Recent advances and retreats in the knowledge of dorsal column functions. In: Recent Contributions in Neurophysiology, edited by J. P. Cordeau. New York: Elsevier, 1972 (EEG Suppl., vol 31).
 598. Wall, P. D. The somatosensory system. In: Handbook of Psychobiology, edited by M. S. Gazzaniga and C. Blakemore. New York: Academic, 1975, p. 373–392.
 599. Wall, P. D., and R. Dubner. Somatosensory pathways. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 34: 315–336, 1972.
 600. Wall, P. D., and M. D. Egger. Formation of new connections in adult rat brains after partial deafferentation. Nature London 232: 542–545, 1971.
 601. Wall, P. D., and W. Noordenbos. Sensory functions which remain in man after complete transection of dorsal columns. Brain 100: 641–653, 1977.
 602. Welker, C. Receptive fields of barrels in the somatosensory neocortex of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 166: 173–189, 1976.
 603. Welker, W. I. Principles of organization of the ventrobasal complex in mammals. Brain Behav. Evol. 7: 253–336, 1974.
 604. Welker, W. I. Mapping the brain. Historical trends in functional localization. Brain Behav. Evol. 13: 327–343, 1976.
 605. Welker, W. I., and J. I. Johnson, Jr. Correlation between nuclear morphology and somatotopic organization in ventrobasal complex of the raccoon's thalamus. J. Anat. 99: 761–790, 1965.
 606. Welker, W. L., J. I. Johnson, and B. H. Pubols, Jr. Some morphological and physiological characteristics of the somatic sensory system in raccoons. Am. Zool. 4: 75–94, 1964.
 607. Weller, W. L., and J. I. Johnson. Barrels in cerebral cortex altered by disruption in newborn but not in five‐day‐old mice. (Cricetidae and Muridae). Brain Res. 83: 504–508, 1975.
 608. Wen, C. Y., C. K. Tan, and W. C. Wong. Presynaptic dendrites in the cuneate nucleus of the monkey (Macaca fascicularis) Neurosci. Lett. 5: 129–132, 1977.
 609. Werner, G. The topology of the body representation in the somatic afferent pathway. In: The Neurosciences, Second Study Program, edited by F. O. Schmitt. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press, 1970, p. 605–629.
 610. Werner, G. Neural information processing with stimulus feature extractors. In: The Neurosciences, Third Study Program, edited by F. O. Schmitt and F. G. Worden. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974, p. 171–183.
 611. Werner, G. Cutaneous stimulus registration and information processing in the somesthetic cortex. J. Invest. Dermatol. 69: 172–180, 1977.
 612. Werner, G. Static and dynamic components of object representations in the central nervous system. In: Architectonics of the Cerebral Cortex, edited by M. A. B. Brazier and H. Petsche. New York: Raven, 1978.
 613. Werner, G., and V. B. Mountcastle. Neural activity in mechanoreceptive cutaneous afferents: stimulus‐response relations, Weber functions, and information transmission. J. Neurophysiol. 28: 359–397, 1965.
 614. Werner, G., and B. L. Whitsel. The topology of dermatomal projection in the medial lemniscal system. J. Physiol. London 192: 123–144, 1967.
 615. Werner, G., and B. L. Whitsel. Topology of the body representation in somatosensory area I of primates. J. Neurophysiol. 31: 856–869, 1968.
 616. Werner, G., and B. L. Whitsel. Stimulus feature detection by neurons of somatosensory areas I and II of primates. IEEE Trans. Man‐Machine Syst. 11: 36–38, 1970.
 617. Werner, G., and B. L. Whitsel. The somatic sensory cortex: functional organization. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. The Somatic Sensory System, edited by A. Iggo. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1973, vol. 2.
 618. Werner, G., B. L. Whitsel, and L. M. Petrucelli. Data structure and algorithms in the primate somatosensory cortex. In: Brain and Human Behavior, edited by A. G. Karczmar and J. C. Eccles. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1972, p. 164–186.
 619. Westman, J. The lateral cervical nucleus in the cat. III. An electron microscopical study after transection of spinal afferents. Exp. Brain. Res. 1: 32–50, 1969.
 620. Westman, J. The lateral cervical nucleus in the cat. V. A quantitative evaluation of the bouton‐ and glia‐covered surface area of different LCN‐neurons. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 115: 377–387, 1971.
 621. White, J. C., and W. H. Sweet. Pain, Its Mechanisms and Neurosurgical Control. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1955.
 622. Whitehorn, D., R. W. Morse, and A. L. Towe. Role of the spinocervical tract in production of the primary cortical response to forepaw stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 25: 349–364, 1969.
 623. Whitlock, D. G., and E. R. Perl. Afferent projections through ventrolateral funiculi to thalamus of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 22: 133–148, 1959.
 624. Whitlock, D. G., and E. R. Perl. Thalamic projections of spinothalamic pathways in monkeys. Exp. Neurol. 3: 240–255, 1961.
 625. Whitsel, B. L., and D. A. Dreyer. Comparison of single unit data obtained from the different topographic subdivisions of the postcentral gyrus of the macaque: implications for the organization of somatosensory projection pathways. Exp. Brain. Res. Suppl. 1: 415–420, 1976.
 626. Whitsel, B. L., D. A. Dreyer, and M. Hollins. Representation of moving stimuli by somatosensory neurons. Federation Proc. 37: 2223–2227, 1978.
 627. Whitsel, B. L., D. A. Dreyer, M. Hollins, and M. G. Young. The coding of direction of tactile stimulus movement: correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological data. In: Sensory Functions of the Skin in Humans, edited by D. Kenshalo. New York: Plenum, 1980, p. 79–107.
 628. Whitsel, B. L., D. A. Dreyer, and J. R. Roppolo. Determinants of body representation in postcentral gyrus of macaques. J. Neurophysiol. 34: 1018–1034, 1971.
 629. Whitsel, B. L., L. M. Petrucelli, H. Ha, and D. A. Dreyer. The resorting of spinal afferents as antecedents to the body representation in the postcentral gyrus. Brain Behav. Evol. 5: 303–341, 1972.
 630. Whitsel, B. L., L. M. Petrucelli, and G. Sapiro. Modality representation in the lumbar and cervical fasciculus gracilis of squirrel monkeys. Brain Res. 15: 67–78, 1969.
 631. Whitsel, B. L., L. M. Petrucelli, G. Sapiro, and H. Ha. Fiber sorting in the fasciculus gracilis of squirrel monkeys. Exp. Neurol. 29: 227–242, 1970.
 632. Whitsel, B. L., L. M. Petrucelli, and G. Werner. Symmetry and connectivity in the map of the body surface in somatosensory area II of primates. J. Neurophysiol. 32: 170–183, 1969.
 633. Whitsel, B. L., J. R. Roppolo, and G. Werner. Cortical information processing of stimulus motion on primate skin. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 691–717, 1972.
 634. Whitsel, B. L., A. Rustioni, D. A. Dreyer, P. R. Loe, E. E. Allen, and C. B. Metz. Thalamic projections to S‐1 in macaque monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 178: 385–409, 1978.
 635. Wiberg, M., and A. Blomqvist. Somatosensory projection to the dorsal mesencephalon: anterograde and retrograde tracing with lectin‐conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Neuroscience 7: Suppl.: S228, 1982.
 636. Wiesendanger, M. Input from muscle and cutaneous nerves of the hand and forearm to neurones of the precentral gyrus of baboons and monkeys. J. Physiol. London 228: 203–219, 1973.
 637. Wiesendanger, M., and T. S. Miles. Ascending pathway of low‐threshold muscle afferents to the cerebral cortex and its possible role in motor control. Physiol. Rev. 62: 1234–1270, 1982.
 638. Willis, W. D., and R. E. Coggeshall. Sensory Mechanisms of the Spinal Cord. New York: Plenum, 1978.
 639. Willism W. D., R. A. Maunz, R. D. Foreman, and J. D. Coulter. Static and dynamic responses of spinothalamic tract neurons to mechanical stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 38: 587–600, 1975.
 640. Willis, W. D., D. L. Trevino, J. D. Coulter, and R. A. Maunz. Responses of primate spinothalamic tract neurons to natural stimulation of hindlimb. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 358–372, 1974.
 641. Winter, D. L. N. gracilis of cat. Functional organization and corticofugal effects. J. Neurophysiol. 28: 48–70, 1965.
 642. Wise, S. P., and J. Tanji. Neuronal responses in sensorimotor cortex to ramp displacements and maintained positions imposed on hindlimb of the unanesthetized monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 482–500, 1981.
 643. Wolpaw, J. R. Correlations between task‐related activity and responses to perturbation in primate sensorimotor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 44: 1122–1138, 1980.
 644. Wolpaw, J. R. Amplitude of responses to perturbation in primate sensorimotor cortex as a function of task. J. Neurophysiol. 44: 1139–1147, 1980.
 645. Wong, Y. C., H. C. Kwan, W. A. Mackay, and J. T. Murphy. Spatial organization of precentral cortex in awake primates. I. Somatosensory inputs. J. Neurophysiol. 41: 1107–1120, 1978.
 646. Wong, Y. C., H. C. Kwan, and J. T. Murphy. Projection of primary muscle spindle afferents to motorsensory cortex. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 52: 349–351, 1974.
 647. Wong, Y. C., H. C. Kwan, and J. T. Murphy. Activity of precentral neurons during torque‐triggered hand movements in awake primates. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 57: 174–184, 1979.
 648. Wong, Y. C., H. C. Kwan, and J. T. Murphy. Patterns of early and late discharges in somatotopically identified precentral neurons in awake monkeys in response to somatic inputs. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 57: 574–577, 1979.
 649. Woolsey, C. N. “Second” somatic receiving areas in the cerebral cortex of cat, dog and monkey. Federation Proc. 2: 55, 1943.
 650. Woolsey, C. N. Patterns of sensory representation in the cerebral cortex. Federation Proc. 6: 437–441, 1947.
 651. Woolsey, C. N. Patterns of localization in sensory and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. In: The Biology of Mental Health and Disease. New York: Hoeber, 1952, vol. 25, chapt. 14, p. 654. (Milbank Symp.)
 652. Woolsey, C. N. Organization of somatic sensory and motor areas of the cerebral cortex. In: Biological and Biochemical Bases of Behavior, edited by H. F. Harlow and C. N. Woolsey. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1958, p. 63–81.
 653. Woolsey, C. N. Cortical localization as defined by evoked potential and electrical stimulation studies. In: Cerebral Localization and Organization, edited by G. Shaltenbrand and C. N. Woolsey. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1964, p. 17–26.
 654. Woolsey, C. N. Cortical Sensory Organization. Multiple Somatic Areas. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1981, vol. 1.
 655. Woolsey, C. N., T. E. Erickson, and W. E. Gilson. Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulation. J. Neurosurg. 51: 476–506, 1979.
 656. Woolsey, C. N., and D. Fairman. Contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral representation of cutaneous receptors in somatic areas I and II of the cerebral cortex of pig, sheep and other mammals. Surgery 19: 684–702, 1946.
 657. Woolsey, C. N., W. H. Marshall, and P. Bard. Representation of cutaneous tactile sensibility in the cerebral cortex of the monkey as indicated by evoked potentials. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 70: 339–441, 1942.
 658. Woolsey, T. A., J. R. Anderson, J. R. Wann, and B. B. Stanfied. Effects of early vibrissae damage on neurons in the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus of the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 184: 363–380, 1979.
 659. Woolsey, T. A., and H. Van Der Loos. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectural units. Brain Res. 17: 205–242, 1970.
 660. Woolsey, T. A., and J. R. Wann. Areal changes in mouse cortical barrels following vibrissal damage at different postnatal ages. J. Comp. Neurol. 170: 53–66, 1976.
 661. Woudenberg, R. A. Projections of mechanoreceptive fields to cuneate‐gracile and spinal trigeminal nuclear regions in sheep. Brain Res. 17: 417–437, 1970.
 662. Yin, T. C. T., and W. J. Williams. Dynamic response and transfer characteristics of joint neurons in somatosensory thalamus of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 39: 582–600, 1976.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

Vernon B. Mountcastle. Central Nervous Mechanisms in Mechanoreceptive Sensibility. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 3: Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Sensory Processes: 789-878. First published in print 1984. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp010318