Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Pancreatic Secretion of Electrolytes and Water

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Pancreatic Structure
1.1 Ductal Tree
1.2 Ductal Cells
1.3 Acinar Cells
1.4 Intercellular Junctions
2 Methods of Study
2.1 Intact Gland Preparations
2.2 Ductal Perfusion
2.3 Micropuncture
2.4 Isolated Ductal Tissue
3 Species‐Dependent Patterns of Electrolyte Secretion
3.1 Dog, Cat, and Human
3.2 Rat and Mouse
3.3 Rabbit
3.4 Pig
3.5 Guinea Pig and Hamster
3.6 Sheep, Cow, and Horse
3.7 Primates
4 Sites of Electrolyte and Water Secretion
4.1 Secretin‐Stimulated Bicarbonate Secretion
4.2 Secretion Evoked by Cholecystokinin and Vagal Stimulation
5 Permeability of The Pancreatic Epithelium
5.1 Nonelectrolytes
5.2 Electrolytes
6 Cellular Mechanisms of Electrolyte Secretion from Acinar Cells
6.1 Ionic Requirements for Secretion
6.2 Electrophysiology and Stimulus‐Secretion Coupling
6.3 Cellular Models of Acinar Cell Secretion
7 Cellular Mechanisms of Electrolyte Secretion from Duct Cells
7.1 Stimulus‐Secretion Coupling
7.2 Ionic Requirements and Mechanisms of Secretion
8 Cellular Models of Duct Cell Secretion
9 Future Progress
Figure 1. Figure 1.

A: scanning electron‐microscopic view of rat pancreatic lobule treated with HCl to remove connective tissue. Arrowheads, long intercalated duct that connects with numerous acini (A). × 669. B: scanning electron‐microscopic overview of ductal system of rat pancreas after removal of most acini by ultrasonic vibration. Excretory duct (D) branches dichotomously. Arrows, intercalated ducts. × 220.

From Takahashi 213
Figure 2. Figure 2.

Low‐power micrograph of a segment from a humar, acinus. In acinar cells, polarized arrangement of rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi complex (G), and zymogen granules in relation to the nucleus (N) is evident. Parts of 2 centroacinar cells (cac) close to the lumen (L) are visible. Cp, capillary, × 6,000.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York
Figure 3. Figure 3.

A. Fine structural characteristics of intralobular ducts in human pancreas. Large number of mitochondria, especially in vicinity of Golgi complex (G). L, duct lumen, × 12,000. B. Fine structural characteristics of intralobular ducts in human pancreas. Interdigitations between lateral plasma membranes in adjacent cells, short microvilli on the luminal membrane, and cilia in the duct lumen. × 12,000.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York. From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York
Figure 4. Figure 4.

Fine structure of an interlobular duct in the human pancreas, nf, Nerve fibers in lamina propria. × 5,700.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Schematic diagram of isolated rabbit pancreas and attached duodenum mounted on a polyvinylchloride frame, which is then suspended in a chamber filled with a physiological buffer solution. Stippled area, pancreatic tissue.

(Diagram courtesy of J. J. H. H. M. De Pont.)
Figure 6. Figure 6.

Vascular supply of cat pancreas. Stomach is shown separated from the duodenum, displaced anteriorly, and turned through 180°. A, aorta; CA, celiac axis; GDA, gastroduodenal artery; GSV, gastrosplenic vein; HA, hepatic artery; LA, lumbar artery; LGA, left gastric artery; PV, portal vein; RGA. right gastric artery; SA, splenic artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric vein.

From Case et al. 38
Figure 7. Figure 7.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized cat stimulated to secrete at different flow rates by continuous infusion of different doses of secretin. Flow rate is expressed per gram gland weight (cf. Fig. 8 by assuming a gland weight of 10 g; this is only approximate.

From Case 32
Figure 8. Figure 8.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in the anesthetized rat stimulated by secretin (A), caerulein (an analogue of cholecystokinin) (B), and a combination of secretin and caerulein (C).

From Case 32; data from Sewell and Young 197
Figure 9. Figure 9.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in the anesthetized rabbit stimulated with secretin (A) and cholecystokinin (CCK) (B).

Data from Seow and Young 196a)
Figure 10. Figure 10.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized guinea pig stimulated with secretin (A) and cholecystokinin‐octapeptide (CCK‐8) (B). Broken line, residual anions (Na+ + K+ ‐ Cl), almost all bicarbonate. Flow rate is uncorrected for body weight or gland weight.

Data from Case et al. 37a)
Figure 11. Figure 11.

Effect of increasing doses of secretin on flow rate and electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized Syrian golden hamster. (Unpublished data of A. E. Ali, R. M. Case, and S. C. B. Rutishauser.)

Figure 12. Figure 12.

Effects of secretin on membrane potential and input resistance of rat pancreatic duct cell. An isolated interlobular duct that had been maintained in culture for 24 h was first deflated by sectioning an end. Deflated duct was then placed in a tissue bath and held steady by drawing each end into a micropipette. Because the lumen was not cannulated and drained in these experiments, accumulation of secreted fluid often caused an obvious dilatation of ducts. Bath (volume 1 ml) was perfused with a Krebs‐Ringer bicarbonate buffer 3 ml/min) at 37°C. Potassium acetate‐filled microelectrode was then used to impale a duct cell across its basolateral membrane. A, lower of 2 traces shows duct cell membrane potential. Every 2 s a depolarizing square‐wave current pulse (.5 nA; 100 ms) was applied to the microelectrode. Upper trace, maximum change in membrane potential associated with these current pulses. X and Y, magnitude of injected current was varied to construct a current‐voltage plot. Z, single dose of secretin was injected into the bath to give an instantaneous hormone concentration of 10−8 M. B: input resistance calculated from deflections in membrane potential caused by injected current pulses.

From Gray et al. 81a)
Figure 13. Figure 13.

Tentative models for cellular mechanisms of NaCl secretion by acinar cells of pig (A) and perhaps human, mouse (B), and rat (C). Ach, acetylcholine; CCK, cholecystokinin; GRP, gastrin‐releasing peptide.

Figure 14. Figure 14.

Possible general mechanisms of active bicarbonate transport by pancreatic duct cell. Experimental evidence argues strongly in favor of either model B or C, which cannot be distinguished mechanistically. Both models could be written in many different ways. For example, hydration steps shown occurring in the lumen in B could equally take place inside the cell. In this case the bicarbonate ions generated would have to move across the apical membrane and into the lumen, possibly by diffusion down an electrochemical gradient. Bicarbonate ions might also enter the cell on an anion carrier located on the basolateral membrane. Once inside the cell they could then combine with protons being pumped back from the lumen to form carbon dioxide, which then diffuses across the apical membrane.

Figure 15. Figure 15.

Possible models for transport of weak organic acids and organic anions by pancreatic ductal epithelium. Such compounds can replace bicarbonate ions and support secretion. A: sulfamerazine. Secretion rates obtained with this compound depend on concentration of the lipid‐soluble undissociated buffer component on blood side of the cell. This indicates that the weak acid delivers protons to the lumen by diffusing across the epithelium. B: glycodiazine, actetate, butyrate, formate, and propionate. Secretion rates obtained with these compounds depend on the concentration of the buffer anion on the blood side of the cell. Presumably this means that the anions cross the basolateral membrane of the duct cell on a carrier. Once inside the cell they could combine with protons moving back from the lumen and then diffuse across the apical membrane as undissociated buffer components.

Figure 16. Figure 16.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐lumen) transport of bicarbonate results from backward (lumen‐to‐blood) transport of protons. Primary (Na+‐H+‐ATPase) and secondary (Na+‐H+ exchange) active transport steps are located at luminal and basolateral membranes, respectively.

From Swanson and Solomon 212
Figure 17. Figure 17.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐cell) transport of bicarbonate results from backward (cell‐to‐blood) transport of protons. Secondary active transport step (Na+‐H+ exchange) is located at the basolateral membrane, and bicarbonate leaves the cell down an electrochemical gradient across luminal membrane.

From De Pont et al. 55. In: Electrolyte and Water Transport Across Gastrointestinal Epithelia, © 1982, Raven Press, New York
Figure 18. Figure 18.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐cell) transport of bicarbonate is driven by a secondary active transport process (Na+‐2HCO3‐Cl exchange) on basolateral membrane, and bicarbonate leaves the cell down an electrochemical gradient across the luminal membrane.

From Kuijpers et al. 121
Figure 19. Figure 19.

Small interlobular ducts dissected from pancreas of a copper‐deficient rat. A: collection of 10 ducts. Phase contrast. Bar, 250 μm. B: higher magnification of interlobular duct. Lumen (lu), epithelium (ep), and connective tissue layer (ct) are visible. Phase contrast. Bar, 25 μm. C: interlobular duct from which connective tissue layer has been microdissected. This low‐magnification view shows that duct was ∼1 mm in length. Bar, 100 μm. D: small projections visible on left side of duct are intralobular branches (ib) that have fractured close to their site of origin. Bar, 50 μm. E: apical region of individual cells can be seen clearly when the objective lens is focused on luminal membrane of epithelium. Bar, 10 μm. Bright‐field optics. Plates C‐E obtained from a videotape by photographing monitor screen.

From Arkle et al. 6
Figure 20. Figure 20.

Measurement of fluid secretion from isolated pancreatic duct using micropuncture techniques. Interlobular duct had been maintained in culture for 24 h, during which time the ends of the duct had sealed. Subsequent accumulation of fluid in closed luminal space has caused a dilatation of the lumen, a flattening of the epithelium against the connective tissue layer, and overall swelling of the duct. A: duct is first immobilized by applying a suction pipette (sp) to its outer connective tissue layer and then micropunctured using a beveled, oil‐filled collection pipette (cp). B: success is confirmed by injection of a small volume of colored oil into the lumen. C: duct is deflated by aspirating luminal fluid into the collection pipette. Pipette is then withdrawn from the lumen, the fluid ejected to waste in the tissue bath, and the duct immediately repunctured along the same entry track. Usually the collection period is then started by application of subatmospheric pressure to the pipette. D: if suction is not applied to the collection pipette, secreted fluid accumulates within the closed lumen of the duct, causing it to dilate. Photograph was taken 40 min after C, during which time the duct was perifused with Krebs‐Ringer bicarbonate buffer at 37°C. Phase contrast. Bars, 200 μm.

From Argent et al. 3
Figure 21. Figure 21.

Effects of secretin, bicarbonate ions, and dibutyryl cAMP on fluid secretion from isolated interlobular ducts that had been maintained in culture for 16–52 h. Individual ducts were micropunctured as shown in Fig. 21 and secreted fluid was collected. At the end of the collection period the dimensions of the epithelium were measured and epithelial volume was calculated. Secretion rates, plotted as mean ± SE, are expressed as nl·h−1·nl−1 duct epithelium. •—•, Dose‐response curve for effect of secretin on fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Each point is mean of 4–12 observations on different ducts. ▵—▵, For comparison the dose‐response curve for secretin‐stimulated fluid secretion from the perfused copper‐replete rat pancreas is also shown. Redrawn from data in ref. 113 assuming that 1 clinical unit of secretin = 7.5 × 10−11 mol 129. ○, Effect of replacing bicarbonate ions in perifusion buffer with HEPES on secretin‐stimulated fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Mean of 6 observations on different ducts. □, Effect of 2 × 10−4 M dibutyryl cAMP on fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Mean of 7 observations on different ducts.

Data from Argent et al. 3


Figure 1.

A: scanning electron‐microscopic view of rat pancreatic lobule treated with HCl to remove connective tissue. Arrowheads, long intercalated duct that connects with numerous acini (A). × 669. B: scanning electron‐microscopic overview of ductal system of rat pancreas after removal of most acini by ultrasonic vibration. Excretory duct (D) branches dichotomously. Arrows, intercalated ducts. × 220.

From Takahashi 213


Figure 2.

Low‐power micrograph of a segment from a humar, acinus. In acinar cells, polarized arrangement of rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi complex (G), and zymogen granules in relation to the nucleus (N) is evident. Parts of 2 centroacinar cells (cac) close to the lumen (L) are visible. Cp, capillary, × 6,000.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York


Figure 3.

A. Fine structural characteristics of intralobular ducts in human pancreas. Large number of mitochondria, especially in vicinity of Golgi complex (G). L, duct lumen, × 12,000. B. Fine structural characteristics of intralobular ducts in human pancreas. Interdigitations between lateral plasma membranes in adjacent cells, short microvilli on the luminal membrane, and cilia in the duct lumen. × 12,000.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York. From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York


Figure 4.

Fine structure of an interlobular duct in the human pancreas, nf, Nerve fibers in lamina propria. × 5,700.

From Kern 117. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, © 1986, Raven Press, New York


Figure 5.

Schematic diagram of isolated rabbit pancreas and attached duodenum mounted on a polyvinylchloride frame, which is then suspended in a chamber filled with a physiological buffer solution. Stippled area, pancreatic tissue.

(Diagram courtesy of J. J. H. H. M. De Pont.)


Figure 6.

Vascular supply of cat pancreas. Stomach is shown separated from the duodenum, displaced anteriorly, and turned through 180°. A, aorta; CA, celiac axis; GDA, gastroduodenal artery; GSV, gastrosplenic vein; HA, hepatic artery; LA, lumbar artery; LGA, left gastric artery; PV, portal vein; RGA. right gastric artery; SA, splenic artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric vein.

From Case et al. 38


Figure 7.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized cat stimulated to secrete at different flow rates by continuous infusion of different doses of secretin. Flow rate is expressed per gram gland weight (cf. Fig. 8 by assuming a gland weight of 10 g; this is only approximate.

From Case 32


Figure 8.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in the anesthetized rat stimulated by secretin (A), caerulein (an analogue of cholecystokinin) (B), and a combination of secretin and caerulein (C).

From Case 32; data from Sewell and Young 197


Figure 9.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in the anesthetized rabbit stimulated with secretin (A) and cholecystokinin (CCK) (B).

Data from Seow and Young 196a)


Figure 10.

Electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized guinea pig stimulated with secretin (A) and cholecystokinin‐octapeptide (CCK‐8) (B). Broken line, residual anions (Na+ + K+ ‐ Cl), almost all bicarbonate. Flow rate is uncorrected for body weight or gland weight.

Data from Case et al. 37a)


Figure 11.

Effect of increasing doses of secretin on flow rate and electrolyte composition of pancreatic juice in anesthetized Syrian golden hamster. (Unpublished data of A. E. Ali, R. M. Case, and S. C. B. Rutishauser.)



Figure 12.

Effects of secretin on membrane potential and input resistance of rat pancreatic duct cell. An isolated interlobular duct that had been maintained in culture for 24 h was first deflated by sectioning an end. Deflated duct was then placed in a tissue bath and held steady by drawing each end into a micropipette. Because the lumen was not cannulated and drained in these experiments, accumulation of secreted fluid often caused an obvious dilatation of ducts. Bath (volume 1 ml) was perfused with a Krebs‐Ringer bicarbonate buffer 3 ml/min) at 37°C. Potassium acetate‐filled microelectrode was then used to impale a duct cell across its basolateral membrane. A, lower of 2 traces shows duct cell membrane potential. Every 2 s a depolarizing square‐wave current pulse (.5 nA; 100 ms) was applied to the microelectrode. Upper trace, maximum change in membrane potential associated with these current pulses. X and Y, magnitude of injected current was varied to construct a current‐voltage plot. Z, single dose of secretin was injected into the bath to give an instantaneous hormone concentration of 10−8 M. B: input resistance calculated from deflections in membrane potential caused by injected current pulses.

From Gray et al. 81a)


Figure 13.

Tentative models for cellular mechanisms of NaCl secretion by acinar cells of pig (A) and perhaps human, mouse (B), and rat (C). Ach, acetylcholine; CCK, cholecystokinin; GRP, gastrin‐releasing peptide.



Figure 14.

Possible general mechanisms of active bicarbonate transport by pancreatic duct cell. Experimental evidence argues strongly in favor of either model B or C, which cannot be distinguished mechanistically. Both models could be written in many different ways. For example, hydration steps shown occurring in the lumen in B could equally take place inside the cell. In this case the bicarbonate ions generated would have to move across the apical membrane and into the lumen, possibly by diffusion down an electrochemical gradient. Bicarbonate ions might also enter the cell on an anion carrier located on the basolateral membrane. Once inside the cell they could then combine with protons being pumped back from the lumen to form carbon dioxide, which then diffuses across the apical membrane.



Figure 15.

Possible models for transport of weak organic acids and organic anions by pancreatic ductal epithelium. Such compounds can replace bicarbonate ions and support secretion. A: sulfamerazine. Secretion rates obtained with this compound depend on concentration of the lipid‐soluble undissociated buffer component on blood side of the cell. This indicates that the weak acid delivers protons to the lumen by diffusing across the epithelium. B: glycodiazine, actetate, butyrate, formate, and propionate. Secretion rates obtained with these compounds depend on the concentration of the buffer anion on the blood side of the cell. Presumably this means that the anions cross the basolateral membrane of the duct cell on a carrier. Once inside the cell they could combine with protons moving back from the lumen and then diffuse across the apical membrane as undissociated buffer components.



Figure 16.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐lumen) transport of bicarbonate results from backward (lumen‐to‐blood) transport of protons. Primary (Na+‐H+‐ATPase) and secondary (Na+‐H+ exchange) active transport steps are located at luminal and basolateral membranes, respectively.

From Swanson and Solomon 212


Figure 17.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐cell) transport of bicarbonate results from backward (cell‐to‐blood) transport of protons. Secondary active transport step (Na+‐H+ exchange) is located at the basolateral membrane, and bicarbonate leaves the cell down an electrochemical gradient across luminal membrane.

From De Pont et al. 55. In: Electrolyte and Water Transport Across Gastrointestinal Epithelia, © 1982, Raven Press, New York


Figure 18.

Cellular model for duct cell electrolyte secretion. Forward (blood‐to‐cell) transport of bicarbonate is driven by a secondary active transport process (Na+‐2HCO3‐Cl exchange) on basolateral membrane, and bicarbonate leaves the cell down an electrochemical gradient across the luminal membrane.

From Kuijpers et al. 121


Figure 19.

Small interlobular ducts dissected from pancreas of a copper‐deficient rat. A: collection of 10 ducts. Phase contrast. Bar, 250 μm. B: higher magnification of interlobular duct. Lumen (lu), epithelium (ep), and connective tissue layer (ct) are visible. Phase contrast. Bar, 25 μm. C: interlobular duct from which connective tissue layer has been microdissected. This low‐magnification view shows that duct was ∼1 mm in length. Bar, 100 μm. D: small projections visible on left side of duct are intralobular branches (ib) that have fractured close to their site of origin. Bar, 50 μm. E: apical region of individual cells can be seen clearly when the objective lens is focused on luminal membrane of epithelium. Bar, 10 μm. Bright‐field optics. Plates C‐E obtained from a videotape by photographing monitor screen.

From Arkle et al. 6


Figure 20.

Measurement of fluid secretion from isolated pancreatic duct using micropuncture techniques. Interlobular duct had been maintained in culture for 24 h, during which time the ends of the duct had sealed. Subsequent accumulation of fluid in closed luminal space has caused a dilatation of the lumen, a flattening of the epithelium against the connective tissue layer, and overall swelling of the duct. A: duct is first immobilized by applying a suction pipette (sp) to its outer connective tissue layer and then micropunctured using a beveled, oil‐filled collection pipette (cp). B: success is confirmed by injection of a small volume of colored oil into the lumen. C: duct is deflated by aspirating luminal fluid into the collection pipette. Pipette is then withdrawn from the lumen, the fluid ejected to waste in the tissue bath, and the duct immediately repunctured along the same entry track. Usually the collection period is then started by application of subatmospheric pressure to the pipette. D: if suction is not applied to the collection pipette, secreted fluid accumulates within the closed lumen of the duct, causing it to dilate. Photograph was taken 40 min after C, during which time the duct was perifused with Krebs‐Ringer bicarbonate buffer at 37°C. Phase contrast. Bars, 200 μm.

From Argent et al. 3


Figure 21.

Effects of secretin, bicarbonate ions, and dibutyryl cAMP on fluid secretion from isolated interlobular ducts that had been maintained in culture for 16–52 h. Individual ducts were micropunctured as shown in Fig. 21 and secreted fluid was collected. At the end of the collection period the dimensions of the epithelium were measured and epithelial volume was calculated. Secretion rates, plotted as mean ± SE, are expressed as nl·h−1·nl−1 duct epithelium. •—•, Dose‐response curve for effect of secretin on fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Each point is mean of 4–12 observations on different ducts. ▵—▵, For comparison the dose‐response curve for secretin‐stimulated fluid secretion from the perfused copper‐replete rat pancreas is also shown. Redrawn from data in ref. 113 assuming that 1 clinical unit of secretin = 7.5 × 10−11 mol 129. ○, Effect of replacing bicarbonate ions in perifusion buffer with HEPES on secretin‐stimulated fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Mean of 6 observations on different ducts. □, Effect of 2 × 10−4 M dibutyryl cAMP on fluid secretion from isolated ducts. Mean of 7 observations on different ducts.

Data from Argent et al. 3
References
 1. Akao, S., D. E. Bockman, P. Lechene de la Porte, and H. Sarles. Three‐dimensional pattern of ductuloacinar associations in normal and pathological human pancreas. Gastroenterology 90: 661–668, 1986.
 2. Ali, A. E., R. M. Case, and S. C. B. Rutishauser. Factors affecting the secretion of pancreatic and bile secretion in Syrian golden hamster (Abstract). Digestion 35: 3, 1986.
 3. Ammar, E. M., D. Hutson, and T. Scratcherd. Absence of a relationship between arterial pH and pancreatic bicarbonate secretion in the isolated perfused cat pancreas. J. Physiol. Land. 388: 495–504, 1987.
 4. Argent, B. E., S. Arkle, M. J. Cullen, and R. Green. Morphological, biochemical and secretory studies on rat pancreatic ducts maintained in tissue culture. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. 71: 633–648, 1986.
 5. Argent, B. E., S. Arkle, M. A. Gray, and J. R. Greenwell. Two types of calcium sensitive cation channels in isolated rat pancreatic duct cells (Abstract). J. Physiol. Lond. 386: 82P, 1987.
 6. Argent, B. E., R. M. Case, and T. Scratcherd. Stimulation of amylase secretion from the perfused cat pancreas by potassium and other alkali metal ions. J. Physiol. Lond. 216: 611–624, 1971.
 7. Argent, B. E., R. M. Case, and T. Scratcherd. Amylase secretion by the perfused cat pancreas in relation to the secretion of calcium and other electrolytes and as influenced by the external ionic environment. J. Physiol. Lond. 230: 575–593, 1973.
 8. Argent, B. E., M. A. Gray, and J. R. Greenwell. Secretin‐regulated anion channel on the apical membrane of rat pancreatic duct cells in vitro (Abstract). J. Physiol. Lond. 391: 33P, 1987.
 9. Argent, B. E., M. A. Gray, and J. R. Greenwell. Characteristics of a large‐conductance anion channel in membrane patches excised from rat pancreatic duct cells in vitro (Abstract). J. Physiol. Lond. 394: 146P, 1987.
 10. Arkle, S., C. M. Lee, M. J. Cullen, and B. E. Argent. Isolation of ducts from the pancreas of copper‐deficient rats. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. 71: 249–265, 1986.
 11. Baxter, S. G. Continuous pancreatic secretion in the rabbit. Am. J. Physiol. 96: 343–348, 1931.
 12. Baxter, S. G. Nervous control of the pancreatic secretion in the rabbit. Am. J. Physiol. 96: 349–355, 1931.
 13. Becker, V. Histochemistry of the exocrine pancreas. In: The Exocrine Pancreas, edited by A. V. S. de Reuck and M. P. Cameron. London: Churchill, 1962, p. 56–63. (Ciba Found. Symp.).
 14. Beglinger, C, M. I. Grossman, and T. E. Solomon. Interaction between stimulants of exocrine pancreatic secretion in dogs. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 9): G173–G179, 1984.
 15. Benos, D. J. Amiloride: a molecular probe of sodium transport in tissues and cells. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Cell Physiol. 11): C131–C145, 1982.
 16. Benz, J., B. Eckstein, E. K. Matthews, and J. A. Williams. Control of amylase release in vitro: effects of ions, cyclic AMP, and colchicine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 46: 66–77, 1972.
 17. Berridge, M. J., B. D. Lindley, and W. T. Prince. Membrane permeability changes during stimulation of isolated salivary glands of Calliphora by 5‐hydroxytryptamine. J. Physiol. Lond. 244: 549–567, 1975.
 18. Birnbaum, D., and F. Hollander. Inhibition of pancreatic secretion by the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor 2‐acetylamino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐5‐sulfonamide, Diamox (#6063). Am. J. Physiol. 174: 191–195, 1953.
 19. Blomfield, J., P. J. Settree, H. M. Allars, and A. R. Rush. Ultrastructural changes in the sheep pancreas stimulated in vivo by secretin, cholecystokinin and carbachol. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 36: 204–216, 1982.
 20. Bockman, D. E. Anastomosing tubular arrangement of the exocrine pancreas. Am. J. Anat. 147: 113–118, 1976.
 21. Bockman, D. E. Anastomosing tubular arrangement of dog exocrine pancreas. Cell Tissue Res. 189: 497–500, 1978.
 22. Bockman, D. E. Architecture of normal pancreas as revealed by retrograde injection. Cell Tissue Res. 205: 445–451, 1980.
 23. Bockman, D. E., W. R. Boydston, and I. Parsa. Architecture of human pancreas: implications for early changes in pancreatic disease. Gastroenterology 83: 55–61, 1983.
 24. Bockman, D. E., M. Büchler, and H. G. Beger. Structure and function of specialized cilia in the exocrine pancreas. Int. J. Pancreatol. 1: 21–28, 1986.
 25. Bolender, R. P. Sterological analysis of the guinea pig pancreas. I. Analytical model and quantitative description of non‐stimulated pancreatic exocrine cells. J. Cell Biol. 61: 269–287, 1974.
 26. Bonting, S. L., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, A. M. M. Fleuren‐Jakobs, and J. W. C. M. Jansen. The reflexion coefficient as a measure of transepithelial permeability in the isolated rabbit pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 309: 547–555, 1980.
 27. Bonting, S. L., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and J. W. C. M. Jansen. The role of sodium ions in pancreatic fluid secretion in the rabbit. J. Physiol. Lond. 309: 533–546, 1980.
 28. Boron, W. F. Transport of H+ and of ionic weak acids and bases. J. Membr. Biol. 72: 1–16, 1983.
 29. Brooks, F. P. Diseases of the Exocrine Pancreas. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1980.
 30. Brown, J. C., A. A. Harper, and T. Scratcherd. Potentiation of secretin stimulation of the pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 190: 519–530, 1967.
 31. Buanes, T., T. Grotmol, T. Landsverk, and M. G. Raeder. Ultrastructure of pancreatic duct cells at secretory rest and during secretin‐dependent NaHCO3 secretion. Acta Physiol. Scand. 131: 55–62, 1987.
 32. Bundgaard, M., M. Møller, and J. H. Poulsen. Localisation of sodium pump sites in cat pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 313: 405–414, 1981.
 33. Burchardt, B. C., K. Sato, and E. Frömter. Electrophysiological analysis of bicarbonate permeation across the peritubular cell membrane of rat kidney proximal tubule. I. Basic observations. Pfluegers Arch. 401: 34–42, 1984.
 34. Burg, M. B. Introduction: background and development of microperfusion technique. Kidney Int. 22: 417–424, 1982.
 35. Caflisch, C. R., S. Solomon, and W. R. Galey. Exocrine ductal pCO2 in the rabbit pancreas. Pfluegers Arch. 380: 121–125, 1979.
 36. Caflisch, C. R., S. Solomon, and W. R. Galey. In situ micropuncture study of pancreatic duct pH. Am. J. Physiol. 238 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1): G263–G268, 1980.
 37. Case, R. M. Pancreatic secretion: cellular aspects. In: Scientific Basis of Gastroenterology, edited by H. L. Duthieand K. G. Wormsley. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1978, p. 163–198.
 38. Case, R. M. Synthesis, intracellular transport and discharge of exportable protein in the pancreatic acinar cell and other cells. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 53: 211–354, 1978.
 39. Case, R. M., and B. E. Argent. Bicarbonate secretion by pancreatic duct cells: mechanisms and control. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 213–243.
 40. Case, R. M., and B. E. Argent. Studies on the pancreas in vivo and during perfusion. In: Biomembranes: Biological Transport, edited by S. Fleischer and B. Fleischer. Orlando, FL: Academic, in press.
 41. Case, R. M., M. Charlton, P. A. Smith, and T. Scratcherd. Electrolyte secretory processes in exocrine pancreas and their intracellular control. In: Biology of Normal and Cancerous Exocrine Pancreatic Cells, edited by A. Ribet, L. Pradayrol, and C. Susini. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North‐Holland, 1980, p. 41–54. (INSERM Symp. 15.).
 42. Case, R. M., A. D. Conigrave, E. J. Favaloro, I. Novak, C. H. Thompson, and J. A. Young. The role of buffer anions and protons in secretion by the rabbit mandibular salivary gland. J. Physiol. Lond. 322: 273–286, 1982.
 43. Case, R. M., A. Garner, and P. J. Padfield. Pancreatic electrolyte and amylase secretion in the anaesthetized guinea‐pig stimulated with either secretin, cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK‐8) or bombesin (Abstract). J. Physiol. Lond. 391: 104P, 1987.
 44. Case, R. M., A. A. Harper, and T. Scratcherd. Water and electrolyte secretion by the perfused pancreas of the cat. J. Physiol. Lond. 196: 133–149, 1968.
 45. Case, R. M., A. A. Harper, and T. Scratcherd. The secretion of electrolytes and enzymes by the pancreas of the anesthetized cat. J. Physiol. Lond. 201: 335–348, 1969.
 46. Case, R. M., J. Hotz, D. Hutson, T. Scratcherd, and R. D. A. Wynne. Electrolyte secretion by the isolated cat pancreas during replacement of extracellular bicarbonate by organic anions and chloride by inorganic anions. J. Physiol. Lond. 286: 563–576, 1979.
 47. Case, R. M., M. Hunter, I. Novak, and J. A. Young. The anionic basis of fluid secretion by the rabbit mandibular salivary gland. J. Physiol. Lond. 349: 619–630, 1984.
 48. Case, R. M., M. Johnson, T. Scratcherd, and H. S. A. Sherratt. Cyclic adenosine 3',5'‐monophosphate concentration in the pancreas following stimulation by secretin, chole‐cystokinin‐pancreozymin and acetylcholine. J. Physiol. Lond. 223: 669–684, 1972.
 49. Case, R. M., and T. Scratcherd. On the permeability of the pancreatic duct membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 219: 493–495, 1970.
 50. Case, R. M., and T. Scratcherd. The actions of dibutyryl cyclic adenosine 3',5'‐monophosphate and methyl xanthines on pancreatic exocrine secretion. J. Physiol. Lond. 223: 649–667, 1972.
 51. Case, R. M., and T. Scratcherd. The secretion of alkali metal ions by the perfused cat pancreas as influenced by the composition and osmolality of the external environment and by inhibitors of metabolism and Na+,K+‐ATPase activity. J. Physiol. Lond. 242: 415–428, 1974.
 52. Case, R. M., T. Scratcherd, and R. D. Wynne. The origin and secretion of pancreatic juice bicarbonate. J. Physiol. Lond. 210: 1–15, 1970.
 53. Ceccarelli, B., F. Clemente, and J. Meldolesi. Secretion of calcium in pancreatic juice. J. Physiol. Lond. 245: 617–638, 1975.
 54. Chariot, J., C. Rozé, J. de La Tour, M. Souchard, and C. Vaille. Modulation of stimulated pancreatic secretion by sympathomimetic amines in the rat. Pharmacology 26: 313–323, 1983.
 55. Chariot, J., C. Rozé, J. de La Tour, and C. Vaille. Stimulation vagale non cholinergique de la sécrétion pancréatique externe chez le rat. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 6: 371–378, 1982.
 56. Comline, R. S., L. W. Hall, J. C. D. Hickson, A. Murillo, and R. G. Walker. Pancreatic secretion in the horse (Abstract). J. Physiol. Lond. 204: 10P–11P, 1969.
 57. Davison, J. S., and V. Dickson. Vagal nonadrenergic, non‐cholinergic (NANC) nerves control pancreatic exocrine secretion in the guinea pig. In: Secretion: Mechanisms and Control, edited by R. M. Case, J. M. Lingard, and J. A. Young. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press, 1984, p. 225–230.
 58. De Almeida, A. L., and M. I. Grossman. Experimental production of pancreatitis with ethionine. Gastroenterology 20: 554–577, 1952.
 59. Debas, H. T., and M. I. Grossman. Pure cholecystokinin: pancreatic protein and bicarbonate response. Digestion 9: 469–481, 1973.
 60. DeLisle, R. C., and U. Hopfer. Electrolyte permeabilities of pancreatic zymogen granules (Abstract). J. Cell Biol. 97: 171a, 1983.
 61. De Pont, J. J. H. H. M., J. W. C. M. Jansen, G. A. J. Kuijpers, and S. L. Bonting. A model for pancreatic fluid secretion. In: Electrolyte and Water Transport Across Gastrointestinal Epithelia, edited by R. M. Case, A. Garner, L. A. Turnberg, and J. A. Young. New York: Raven, 1982, p. 11–20.
 62. Deschodt‐Lanckman, M., P. Robberecht, P. De Neef, F. Labrie, and J. Christophe. In vitro interactions of gastrointestinal hormones on cyclic adenosine 3',5'‐monophosphate levels and amylase output in the rat pancreas. Gastroenterology 68: 318–325, 1975.
 63. Dewhurst, D. G., N. A. Hadi, D. Hutson, and T. Scratcherd. The permeability of the secretin stimulated exocrine pancreas to non‐electrolytes. J. Physiol. Lond. 277: 103–114, 1978.
 64. Domschke, S., W. Domschke, W. Rösch, S. J. Konturek, E. Wünsch, and L. Demling. Bicarbonate and cyclic AMP content of pure human pancreatic juice in response to graded doses of synthetic secretin. Gastroenterology 70: 533–536, 1976.
 65. Domschke, S., S. J. Konturek, W. Domschke, A. Dembiński, P. Thor, R. Kröl, and L. Demling. Cyclic‐AMP and pancreatic bicarbonate secretion in response to secretin in dogs. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 150: 773–779, 1975.
 66. Dreiling, D. A., H. D. Janowitz, and M. Halpern. The effect of a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, Diamox, on human pancreatic secretion. Gastroenterology 29: 262–279, 1955.
 67. Dufresne, N., M.‐J. Bastie, N. Vaysse, Y. Creach, E. Hollande, and A. Ribet. The amiloride sensitive Na+/H+ antiport in guinea pig pancreatic acini. Characterization and stimulation by caerulein. FEBS Lett. 187: 126–130, 1985.
 68. Eisenmann, G. Some elementary factors involved in specific ion permeation. In: Proc. 23rd Int. Congr. Physiol. Sci., Tokyo. Amsterdam: Excerpta Med., 1965, p. 489–506.
 69. Evans, L. A. R., D. Pirani, D. I. Cook, and J. A. Young. Intraepithelial current flow in rat pancreatic secretory epithelia. Pfluegers Arch. 407: S107–S111, 1986.
 70. Evans, L. A. R., and J. A. Young. The effect of transport blockers on pancreatic ductal secretion (Abstract). Proc. Aust. Physiol. Pharmacol. Soc. 16: 98P, 1985.
 71. Exley, P. M., C. M. Fuller, and D. V. Gallacher. Potassium uptake in the mouse submandibular gland is dependent on chloride and sodium and abolished by piretanide. J. Physiol. Lond. 378: 97–108, 1986.
 72. Fahrenkrug, J. Role of VIPergic neurones in pancreatic bicarbonate secretion. Biomed. Res. 1: 84–87, 1980.
 73. Fell, B. F., L. J. Farmer, C. Farquharson, I. Bremner, and D. S. Graca. Observations on the pancreas of cattle deficient in copper. J. Comp. Pathol. 95: 573–590, 1985.
 74. Fell, B. F., T. P. King, and N. T. Davies. Pancreatic atrophy in copper‐deficient rats: histochemical and ultrastructural evidence of a selective effect on acinar cells. Histochem. J. 14: 665–680, 1982.
 75. Findlay, I., and O. H. Petersen. Acetylcholine stimulates a Ca2+‐dependent Cl‐ conductance in mouse lacrimal acinar cells. Pfluegers Arch. 403: 328–330, 1985.
 76. Flemström, G., and A. Garner. Gastroduodenal HCO3‐ transport: characteristics and proposed role in acidity regulation and mucosal protection. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 5): G183–G193, 1982.
 77. Fölsch, U. R., and W. Creutzfeldt. Pancreatic duct cells in rats: secretory studies in response to secretin, cholecystokinin‐pancreozymin, and gastrin. Gastroenterology 73: 1053–1059, 1977.
 78. Fölsch, U. R., H. Fischer, H. D. Söling, and W. Creutzfeldt. Effects of gastrointestinal hormones and carbamylcholine on cAMP accumulation in isolated pancreatic duct fragments from the rat. Digestion 20: 277–292, 1980.
 79. Frizzell, R. A. Cystic fibrosis: a disease of ion channels? Trends Neurosci. 10: 190–193, 1987.
 80. Frizzell, R. A., M. Field, and S. C. Schultz. Sodium‐coupled chloride transport by epithelial tissues. Am. J. Physiol. 236 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 5): F1–F8, 1979.
 81. Frömter, E. Kidney proximal tubule—part of a workshop discussion. In: Secretion: Mechanisms and Control, edited by R. M. Case, J. M. Lingard, and J. A. Young. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press, 1984, p. 37–39.
 82. Furuta, Y., K. Hashimoto, and M. Washizaki. β‐Adrenoceptor stimulation of exocrine secretion from the rat pancreas. Br. J. Pharmacol. 62: 25–29, 1978.
 83. Furuta, Y., K. Iwatsuki, O. Takeuchi, and K. Hashimoto. Secretin‐like activity of dopamine on canine pancreatic secretion. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 108: 353–360, 1972.
 84. Gardiner, B. N., and D. M. Small. Simultaneous measurement of the pancreatic and biliary response to CCK and secretin. Primate biliary physiology. XIII. Gastroenterology 70: 403–407, 1976.
 85. Gardner, J. D., and R. T. Jensen. Receptors mediating the actions of secretagogues on pancreatic acinar cells. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 109–122.
 86. Githens, S. Differentiation and development of the exocrine pancreas in animals. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 21–32.
 87. Githens, S., III, D. R. G. Holmquist, J. F. Whelan, and J. R. Ruby. Characterization of ducts isolated from the pancreas of the rat. J. Cell Biol. 85: 122–135, 1980.
 88. Githens, S., III, D. R. G. Holmquist, J. F. Whelan, and J. R. Ruby. Ducts of the rat pancreas in agarose matrix culture. In Vitro Rockville 16: 797–808, 1980.
 89. Githens, S., III, D. R. G. Holmquist, J. F. Whelan, and J. R. Ruby. Morphologic and biochemical characteristics of isolated and cultured pancreatic ducts. Cancer Phila. 47: 1505–1512, 1981.
 90. Gray, M. A., J. R. Greenwell, and B. E. Argent. Ion channels in pancreatic duct cells: characterization and role in bicarbonate secretion. In: Cellular and Molecular Basis of Cystic Fibrosis, edited by G. Mastella and P. M. Quinton. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Press, 1988. p. 205–221.
 91. Greenwell, J. R. The effects of cholecystokinin‐pancreozymin, acetylcholine and secretin on the membrane potentials of mouse pancreatic cells in vitro. Pfluegers Arch. 353: 159–170, 1975.
 92. Greenwell, J. R. The selective permeability of the pancreatic duct of the cat to monovalent ions. Pfluegers Arch. 367: 265–270, 1977.
 93. Greger, R., E. Schlatter, and H. Gogelein. Cl‐‐channels in the apical cell membrane of the rectal gland “induced” by cAMP. Pfluegers Arch. 403: 446–448, 1985.
 94. Grossman, M. I., and A. C. Ivy. Effect of alloxan upon secretion of the pancreas. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 63: 62–63, 1946.
 95. Gyr, K., R. H. Wolf, and O. Felsenfeld. Exocrine pancreatic function tests in patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). Am. J. Vet. Res. 35: 1361–1364, 1974.
 96. Handler, J. S. Transport in cultured epithelia. Curr. Eye Res. 4: 317–322, 1985.
 97. Harada, E., K. Nakagawa, and S. Kato. Characteristic secretory response of the exocrine pancreas in various mammalian and avian species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 73A: 447–453, 1982.
 98. Harper, S. L., V. H. Pitts, D. N. Granger, and P. R. Kvietys. Pancreatic tissue oxygenation during secretory stimulation. Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 13): G316–G322, 1986.
 99. Harris, A., and L. Coleman. Establishment of a tissue culture system for epithelial cells derived from human pancreas: a model for the study of cystic fibrosis. J. Cell Sci. 87: 695–703, 1987.
 100. Hart, W. M., and J. E. Thomas. Bicarbonate and chloride of pancreatic juice secreted in response to various stimuli. Gastroenterology 4: 409–420, 1945.
 101. Helgeson, A. S., P. Pour, T. Lawson, and C. J. Grandjean. Exocrine pancreatic secretion in the Syrian golden hamster Mesocricetus auratus. I. Basic values. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol. 66: 473–477, 1980.
 102. Helgeson, A. S., P. Pour, T. Lawson, and C. J. Grandjean. Exocrine pancreatic secretion in the Syrian golden hamster Mesocricetus auratus. II. Effect of secretin and pancreozymin. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol. 66: 479–483, 1980.
 103. Hellmessen, W., A. L. Christian, H. Fasold, and I. Schulz. Coupled Na+‐H+ exchange in isolated acinar cells from rat exocrine pancreas. Am. J. Physiol. 249 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 12): G125–G136, 1985.
 104. Hickson, J. C. D. The secretion of pancreatic juice in response to stimulation of the vagus nerves in the pig. J. Physiol. Lond. 206: 275–297, 1970.
 105. Holian, O., P. E. Donahue, L. M. Nyhus, and C. T. Bombeck. Effect of hormones on cyclic AMP in dog pancreatic tissue and secretion. J. Surg. Res. 32: 51–56, 1982.
 106. Hollander, F., and D. Birnbaum. The role of carbonic anhydrase in pancreatic secretion. Trans. NY Acad. Sci. 15: 56–58, 1952.
 107. Holst, J. J., J. Fahrenkrug, S. Knuhtsen, S. L. Jensen, S. S. Poulsen, and O. V. Nielsen. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the pig pancreas: role of VIPergic nerves in control of fluid and bicarbonate secretion. Regul. Pept. 8: 245–259, 1984.
 108. Holst, J. J., S. L. Jensen, O. V. Nielsen, and T. W. Schwartz. Oxygen supply, oxygen consumption, and endocrine and exocrine secretions of the isolated, perfused, porcine pancreas. Acta Physiol. Scand. 109: 7–13, 1980.
 109. Holst, J. J., O. B. Schaffalitzsky de Muckadell, and J. Fahrenkrug. Nervous control of pancreatic exocrine secretion in pigs. Acta Physiol. Scand. 105: 33–51, 1979.
 110. Hootman, S. R., S. A. Ernst, and J. A. Williams. Secretagogue regulation of Na+‐K+ pump activity in pancreatic acinar cells. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 8): G339–G346, 1983.
 111. Hootman, S. R., D. L. Ochs, and J. A. Williams. Intracellular mediators of Na+‐K+ pump activity in guinea pig pancreatic acinar cells. Am. J. Physiol. 249 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 12): G470–G478, 1985.
 112. Hotz, J., M. Zwicker, H. Minne, and R. Ziegler. Pancreatic enzyme secretion in the conscious rat. Pfluegers Arch. 353: 171–189, 1975.
 113. Hunter, M., P. A. Smith, and R. M. Case. The dependence of fluid secretion by mandibular salivary gland and pancreas on extracellular calcium. Cell Calcium 4: 307–317, 1983.
 114. Jansen, J. W. C. M., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Transepithelial permeability in the rabbit pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 551: 95–108, 1979.
 115. Jansen, J. W. C. M., A. M. M. Fleuren‐Jakobs, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Blocking by 2,4,6‐triaminopyrimidine of increased tight junction permeability induced by acetylcholine in the pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 598: 115–126, 1980.
 116. Jensen, S. L., J. Fahrenkrug, J. J. Holst, C. Kühl, O. V. Nielsen, and O. B. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell. Secretory effects of secretin on isolated perfused porcine pancreas. Am. J. Physiol. 235 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 4): E381–E386, 1978.
 117. Jensen, S. L., J. Fahrenkrug, J. J. Holst, O. V. Nielsen, and O. B. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell. Secretory effects of VIP on isolated perfused porcine pancreas. Am. J. Physiol. 235 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 4): E387–E391, 1978.
 118. Jensen, S. L., J. F. Rehfeld, J. J. Holst, O. V. Nielsen, J. Fahrenkrug, and O. B. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell. Secretory effects of cholecystokinins on the isolated perfused porcine pancreas. Acta Physiol. Scand. 111: 225–231, 1981.
 119. Kalser, M. H., and M. I. Grossman. Pancreatic secretion in dogs with ethionine‐induced pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 26: 189–197, 1954.
 120. Kanno, T., and A. Saito. Influence of external potassium concentration on secretory responses to cholecystokinin‐pancreozymin and ionophore A23187 in the pancreatic acinar cell. J. Physiol. Lond. 278: 251–263, 1978.
 121. Kanno, T., and A. Saito. A comparison of secretory actions of VIP, secretin and CCK‐PZ in the isolated and perfused kitten pancreas. Endocrinol. Jpn. 27, Suppl.: 51–57, 1980.
 122. Kanno, T., I. Shibuya, and N. Asada. The role of extracellular calcium and other ions in the secretory responses of the exocrine pancreas to cholecystokinin. Biomed. Res. 4: 295–302, 1983.
 123. Kanno, T., and M. Yamamoto. Differentiation between the calcium‐dependent effects of cholecystokinin‐pancreozymin and the bicarbonate‐dependent effects of secretin in exocrine secretion of the rat pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 264: 787–799, 1977.
 124. Kempen, H. J. M., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Rat pancreas adenylate cyclase. III. Its role in pancreatic secretion assessed by means of cholera toxin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 392: 276–287, 1975.
 125. Kempen, H. J. M., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Pat pancreas adenylate cyclase. IV. Effect of hormones and other agents on cyclic AMP level and enzyme release. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 496: 65–76, 1977.
 126. Kempen, H. J. M., J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Rat pancreas adenylate cyclase. V. Its presence in isolated rat pancreatic acinar cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 496: 521–531, 1977.
 127. Kern, H. F. Fine structure of the human exocrine pancreas. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 9–19.
 128. Kodama, T. A light and electron microscopic study on the pancreatic ductal system. Acta Pathol. Jpn. 33: 297–321, 1983.
 129. Kopelman, H., P. Durie, K. Gaskin, Z. Weizman, and G. Forstner. Pancreatic fluid secretion and protein hyperconcentration in cystic fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 312: 329–334, 1985.
 130. Kuijpers, G. A. J., I. G. P. Van Nooy, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Anion secretion by the isolated rabbit pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 774: 269–276, 1984.
 131. Kuijpers, G. A. J., I. G. P. Van Nooy, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. The mechanism of fluid secretion in the rabbit pancreas studied by means of various inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 778: 324–331, 1984.
 132. Kumpulainen, T., and P. Jalovaara. Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes in the human pancreas. Gastroenterology 80: 796–799, 1981.
 133. Laval, J., G. Bommelaer, C. Senarens, N. Vaysse, and A. Ribet. Control of cyclic AMP accumulation in dog acini: its relation to amylase release. Digestion 28: 82–89, 1983.
 134. Lebenthal, E., R. Lev, and P. C. Lee. Prenatal and postnatal development of the human exocrine pancreas. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 33–43.
 135. Lenninger, S. Effects of parasympathomimetic agents and vagal stimulation on the flow in the pancreatic duct of the cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 82: 345–353, 1971.
 136. Lenninger, S., and P. Ohlin. The flow of juice from the pancreatic gland of the cat in response to vagal stimulation. J. Physiol. Lond. 216: 303–318, 1971.
 137. Lightwood, R., and H. A. Reber. Micropuncture study of pancreatic secretion in the cat. Gastroenterology 72: 61–66, 1977.
 138. Lim, R. K. S., S. M. Ling, A. C. Liu, and I. C. Yuan. Quantitative relationships between the basic and other components of the pancreatic secretion. Chin. J. Physiol. 10: 475–492, 1936.
 139. Lindgard, J. M., and J. A. Young. β‐Adrenergic control of exocrine secretion by perfused rat pancreas in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 8): G690–G696, 1983.
 140. Loewenstein, W. R. Junctional intracellular communication: the cell‐to‐cell membrane channel. Physiol. Rev. 61: 829–913, 1981.
 141. Magee, D. F. An investigation into the external secretion of the pancreas in sheep. J. Physiol. Lond. 158: 132–143, 1961.
 142. Makhlouf, G. M., and A. L. Blum. An assessment of models for pancreatic secretion. Gastroenterology 59: 896–908, 1970.
 143. Mangos, J. A., and N. R. McSherry. Micropuncture study of excretion of water and electrolytes by the pancreas. Am. J. Physiol. 221: 496–503, 1971.
 144. Mangos, J. A., N. R. McSherry, S. Nousia‐Arvanitakis, and K. Irwin. Secretion and transductal fluxes of ions in exocrine glands of the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. 225: 18–24, 1973.
 145. Mangos, J. A., N. R. McSherry, S. Nousia‐Arvanitakis, and R. F. Schilling. Transductal fluxes of anions in the rat pancreas. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 146: 321–328, 1974.
 146. Mann, F. C., J. P. Foster, and S. D. Brimhall. The relation of the common bile duct to the pancreatic duct in common domestic and laboratory animals. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 5: 203–206, 1920.
 147. Maren, T. H. Discussion following a paper by J. R. Martinez and N. Cassity. In: Secretion: Mechanisms and Control, edited by R. M. Case, J. M. Lindgard, and J. A. Young. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press, 1984, p. 93.
 148. Marty, A. Control of ionic currents and fluid secretion by muscarinic agonists in exocrine glands. Trends Neurosci. 10: 373–377, 1987.
 149. Marty, A., Y. P. Tan, and A. Trautmann. Three types of calcium‐dependent channel in rat lacrimal glands. J. Physiol. Lond. 357: 293–325, 1984.
 150. Maruyama, Y., O. H. Petersen, P. Flanagan, and G. T. Pearson. Quantification of Ca2+‐activated K+ channels under hormonal control in pig pancreas acinar cells. Nature Lond. 305: 228–232, 1983.
 151. Matsumoto, T., and T. Kanno. Potentiation of cholecystokinin‐induced exocrine secretion by either electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve or exogenous VIP administration in the guinea pig pancreas. Peptides Fayetteville 5: 285–289, 1984.
 152. McAllister, R. M. R., and M. D. Kendall. The nerves of the accessory pancreatic ducts of the common starling (Sturnus vulgaris): an ultrastructural and light microscopic study. J. Anat. 139: 437–447, 1984.
 153. Mélèse, T., S. S. Rothman. Distribution of three hexose derivatives across the pancreatic epithelium: paracellular shunts or cellular passage? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 763: 212–219, 1983.
 154. Mélèse, T., and S. S. Rothman. Pancreatic epithelium is permeable to sucrose and inulin across secretory cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4870–4874, 1983.
 155. Moqtaderi, F., H. S. Himal, J. Rudick, and D. A. Dreiling. Pancreatic transductal electrolyte flux. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 58: 177–184, 1972.
 156. Mori, J., H. Satoh, Y. Satoh, and F. Honda. Amines and the rat exocrine pancreas. 3. Effects of amines on pancreatic secretion. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 29: 923–933, 1979.
 157. Morris, A. P., D. V. Gallacher, R. F. Irvine, and O. H. Petersen. Synergism of inositol trisphosphate and tetrakisphosphate in activating Ca2+‐dependent K+ channels. Nature Lond. 330: 653–655, 1987.
 158. Novak, I., and R. Greger. Cellular mechanisms of bicarbonate transport in isolated perfused pancreatic ducts (Abstract). Acta Physiol. Scand. 129: 13A, 1987.
 159. Novak, I., E. Schlatter, and R. Greger. Electrophysiological study of HCO3‐ transport in isolated perfused small ducts of rat pancreas (Abstract). Digestion 35: 44, 1986.
 160. Oates, P. S., and R. G. H. Morgan. Pancreatic response of anaesthetized and conscious rats to bolus injection of cholecystokinin‐pancreozymin. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 34: 283–293, 1981.
 161. Ochs, D. L., J. I. Korenbrot, and J. A. Williams. Intracellular free calcium concentrations in isolated pancreatic acini: effects of secretagogues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 117: 122–128, 1983.
 162. O'Doherty, J., and R. J. Stark. Stimulation of pancreatic acinar secretion: increases in cytosolic calcium and sodium. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 5): G513–G521, 1982.
 163. O'Doherty, J., and R. J. Stark. A transcellullar route for Na‐coupled Cl transport in secreting pancreatic acinar cells. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 8): G499–G503, 1983.
 164. O'Leary, J. F., J. W. Borner, W. J. Runge, L. P. Dehner, and R. L. Goodale. Hyperplasia of pancreatic duct epithelium produced by exposure to sodium deoxycholate. Am. J. Surg. 147: 72–77, 1984.
 165. Pearson, G. T., P. M. Flanagan, and O. H. Petersen. Neural and hormonal control of membrane conductance in the pig pancreatic acinar cell. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 10): G520–G526, 1984.
 166. Pearson, G. T., J. Singh, M. S. Daoud, J. S. Davison, and O. H. Petersen. Control of pancreatic cyclic nucleotide levels and amylase secretion by noncholinergic, nonadrenergic nerves. A study employing electrical field stimulation of guinea pig segments. J. Biol. Chem. 256: 11025–11031, 1981.
 167. Pearson, G. T., J. Singh, and O. H. Petersen. Adrenergic nervous control of cAMP‐mediated amylase secretion in the rat pancreas. Am. J. Physiol. 246 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 9): G563–G573, 1984.
 168. Perlmutter, J., and J. R. Martinez. The chronically reserpinized rat as a possible model for cystic fibrosis. VII. Alterations in the secretory response to cholecystokinin and to secretin from pancreas in vivo. Pediatr. Res. 12: 188–194, 1978.
 169. Petersen, H., and M. I. Grossman. Pancreatic exocrine secretion in anesthetized and conscious rats. Am. J. Physiol. 233 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 2): E530–E536, 1977.
 170. Petersen, O. H. The Electrophysiology of Gland Cells. London: Academic, 1980.
 171. Petersen, O. H. Calcium‐activated potassium channels and fluid secretion by exocrine glands. Am. J. Physiol. 251 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 14): G1–G13, 1986.
 172. Petersen, O. H. Electrophysiology of acinar cells. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 141–161.
 173. Petersen, O. H., I. Findlay, N. Iwatsuki, J. Singh, D. V. Gallacher, C. M. Fuller, G. T. Pearson, M. J. Dunne, and A. P. Morris. Human pancreatic acinar cells: studies of stimulus secretion coupling. Gastroenterology 89: 109–117, 1985.
 174. Petersen, O. H., and Y. Maruyama. Calcium‐activated potassium channels and their role in secretion. Nature Lond. 307: 693–696, 1984.
 175. Petersen, O. H., Y. Maruyama, J. Graf, R. Laugier, A. Nishiyama, and G. T. Pearson. Ionic currents across pancreatic acinar cell membranes and their role in fluid secretion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 296: 151–166, 1981.
 176. Petersen, O. H., and J. Singh. Acetylcholine‐evoked potassium release in the mouse pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 365: 319–329, 1985.
 177. Petersen, O. H., and N. Ueda. Secretion of fluid and amylase in the perfused rat pancreas. J. Physiol. Lond. 264: 819–835, 1977.
 178. Poulsen, J. H., and B. Oakley. Intracellular potassium ion activity in resting and stimulated mouse pancreas and submandibular gland. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 204: 99–104, 1979.
 179. Quinton, P. M. Chloride impermeability in cystic fibrosis. Nature Lond. 301: 421–422, 1983.
 180. Raeder, M., and Ø. Mathisen. Plasma Na+‐ion concentration or pH as regulator of pancreatic HCO3‐ secretion. Acta Physiol. Scand. 112: 19–26, 1981.
 181. Raeder, M., and Ø. Mathisen. Abolished relationship between pancreatic HCO3‐ secretion and arterial pH during carbonic anhydrase inhibition. Acta Physiol. Scand. 114: 97–102, 1982.
 182. Raeder, M., A. Mo, and S. Aune. Effect of plasma H+‐ion concentration on pancreatic HCO3‐ secretion. Acta Physiol. Scand. 105: 420–427, 1979.
 183. Raeder, M., A. Mo, S. Aune, and Ø. Mathisen. Relationship between plasma pH and pancreatic HCO3‐ secretion at different intravenous secretin infusion rates. Acta Physiol. Scand. 109: 187–191, 1980.
 184. Reber, H. A., G. Adler, and K. R. Wedgwood. Studies in the perfused pancreatic duct in the cat. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Diseases, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 255–273.
 185. Reber, H. A., and R. Lightwood. Microcannulation—a new micropuncture technique application in cat pancreas secretion. J. Appl. Physiol. 40: 984–986, 1976.
 186. Reber, H. A., and C. J. Wolf. Micropuncture study of pancreatic electrolyte secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 215: 34–40, 1968.
 187. Reber, H. A., C. J. Wolf, and S. P. Lee. Role of the main duct in pancreatic electrolyte secretion. Surg. Forum 20: 382–384, 1969.
 188. Reynolds, J., and T. Heath. Non‐parallel secretion of pancreatic enzymes in sheep following hormonal or vagal stimulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol. 68: 495–500, 1981.
 189. Ridderstap, A. S. The additive effect of acetazolamide and ouabain on pancreatic secretion in vitro. Pfluegers Arch. 311: 199–204, 1969.
 190. Ridderstap, A. S., and S. L. Bonting. Enzyme secretion by the isolated rabbit pancreas: absence of a relation with the Na‐K activated ATPase. Pfluegers Arch. 313: 53–61, 1969.
 191. Ridderstap, A. S., and S. L. Bonting. Na‐K‐activated adenosine triphosphatase and pancreatic secretion in the dog. Am. J. Physiol. 216: 547–553, 1969.
 192. Robberecht, P., M. Deschodt‐Lanckman, P. de Neef, P. Borgeat, and J. Christophe. In vivo effects of pancreozymin, secretin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and pilocarpine on the levels of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP in the rat pancreas. FEBS Lett. 43: 139–143, 1974.
 193. Rothman, S. S., and F. P. Brooks. Electrolyte secretion from rabbit pancreas in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. 208: 1171–1176, 1965.
 194. Rothman, S. S., and F. P. Brooks. Pancreatic secretion in vitro in “Cl‐‐free,” “CO2‐free,” and low‐Na+ environment. Am. J. Physiol. 209: 790–796, 1965.
 195. Sato, T., M. Sato, E. A. Hudson, and R. T. Jones. Characterization of bovine pancreatic ductal cells isolated by a perfusion‐digestion technique. In Vitro Rockville 19: 651–660, 1983.
 196. Schreurs, V. V. A. M., H. G. P. Swarts, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Role of calcium in exocrine pancreatic secretion. I. Calcium movements in the rabbit pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 404: 257–267, 1975.
 197. Schreurs, V. V. A. M., H. G. P. Swarts, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Role of calcium in exocrine pancreatic secretion. III. Comparison of calcium and magnesium movements in rabbit pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 436: 664–674, 1976.
 198. Schulz, I. Influence of bicarbonate‐CO2‐ and glycodiazine buffer on the secretion of the isolated cat's pancreas. Pfluegers Arch. 329: 283–306, 1971.
 199. Schulz, I. Bicarbonate transport in the exocrine pancreas. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 341: 191–209, 1980.
 200. Schulz, I. Pancreas—part of a workshop discussion. In: Secretion: Mechanisms and Control, edited by R. M. Case, J. M. Lingard, and J. A. Young. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press, 1984, p. 34–36.
 201. Schulz, I., K. Heil, A. Kribben, G. Sachs, and W. Haase. Isolation and functional characterisation of cells from the exocrine pancreas. In: Biology of Normal and Cancerous Exocrine Pancreatic Cells, edited by A. Ribet, L. Pradayrol, and C. Susini. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North‐Holland, 1980, p. 3–18. (INSERM Symp. 15.).
 202. Schulz, I., F. Ströver, and K. J. Ullrich. Lipid soluble weak organic acid buffers as “substrate” for pancreatic secretion. Pfluegers Arch. 323: 121–140, 1971.
 203. Schulz, I., and D. Terreros‐Aranguren. Sidedness of transport steps involved in pancreatic HCO3‐ secretion. In: Electrolyte and Water Transport Across Gastrointestinal Epithelia, edited by R. M. Case, A. Garner, L. A. Turnberg, and J. A. Young. New York: Raven, 1982, p. 143–156.
 204. Schulz, I., A. Yamagata, and M. Weske. Micropuncture studies on the pancreas of the rabbit. Pfluegers Arch. 308: 277–290, 1969.
 205. Scratcherd, T. The isolated perfused pancreas. In: The Exocrine Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology, and Disease, edited by V. L. W. Go, J. D. Gardner, F. P. Brooks, E. Lebenthal, E. P. DiMagno, and G. A. Scheele. New York: Raven, 1986, p. 245–253.
 206. Scratcherd, T., and D. Hutson. The role of chloride in pancreatic secretion. In: Electrolyte and Water Transport Across Gastrointestinal Epithelia, edited by R. M. Case, A. Garner, L. A. Turnberg, and J. A. Young. New York: Raven, 1982, p. 61–72.
 207. Scratcherd, T., D. Hutson, and R. M. Case. Ionic transport mechanisms underlying fluid secretion by the pancreas. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 296: 167–178, 1981.
 208. Seow, K. T. F. P. Pancreatic Fluid and Electrolyte Secretion. Sydney, Australia: Univ. of Sydney, 1986. PhD thesis.
 209. Seow, K. T. F., J. M. Lingard, and J. A. Young. Anionic basis of fluid secretion by rat pancreatic acini in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 13): G140–G148, 1986.
 210. Seow, F., and J. A. Young. Cholecystokinin evokes secretion of a bicarbonate‐rich juice by the rabbit pancreas (Abstract). Proc. Aust. Physiol. Pharmacol. Soc. 17: 199P, 1986.
 211. Sewell, W. A., and J. A. Young. Secretion of electrolytes by the pancreas of the anaesthetized rat. J. Physiol. Lond. 252: 379–396, 1975.
 212. Sewell, W. A., and J. A. Young. The effect of cycloheximide on cholecystokinin‐evoked pancreatic juice of the anaesthetised rat. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 56: 385–394, 1978.
 213. Siegelbaum, S. A., and R. W. Tsien. Modulation of gated ion channels as a mode of transmitter action. Trends Neurosci. 6: 307–313, 1983.
 214. Singh, J. Effects of acetylcholine and caerulein on 86Rb+ efflux in the mouse pancreas. Evidence for a sodium‐potassium‐chloride cotransport system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 775: 77–85, 1984.
 215. Smith, P. A., and R. M. Case. Effects of cholera toxin on cyclic adenosine 3',5'‐monophosphate concentration and secretory processes in the exocrine pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 399: 277–290, 1975.
 216. Smith, P. A., J. P. Sunter, and R. M. Case. Progressive atrophy of pancreatic acinar tissue in rats fed a copper‐deficient diet supplemented with d‐penicillamine or triethylene tetramine: morphological and physiological studies. Digestion 23: 16–30, 1982.
 217. Solberg, L. I., and F. P. Brooks. Cholinergic control of rabbit pancreatic secretion. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 14: 782–787, 1969.
 218. Solomon, A. K. Electrolyte secretion in the pancreas. Federation Proc. 11: 722–731, 1952.
 219. Solomon, T. E., N. Solomon, L. L. Shanbour, and E. D. Jacobson. Direct and indirect effect of nicotine on rabbit pancreatic secretion. Gastroenterology 67: 276–283, 1974.
 220. Sommer, H., and H. Kasper. Effect of acetylcholine, gastrin, and glucagon alone and in combination with secretin and cholecystokinin on the secretion of the isolated perfused rat pancreas. Res. Exp. Med. 179: 239–247, 1981.
 221. Sommer, H., and H. Kasper. The action of synthetic secretin, cholecystokinin‐octapeptide and combinations of these hormones on the secretion of the isolated perfused rat pancreas. Hepato‐Gastroenterology 28: 311–315, 1981.
 222. Stoner, G. D., C. C. Harris, D. G. Bostwick, R. T. Jones, B. F. Trump, E. W. Kingsbury, E. Fineman, and C. Newkirk. Isolation and characterization of epithelial cells from bovine pancreatic duct. In Vitro Rockville 14: 581–590, 1978.
 223. Sundler, F., J. Alumets, R. Håkanson, J. Fahrenkrug, and O. Schaffalitzsky de Muckadell. Peptidergic (VIP) nerves in the pancreas. Histochemistry 55: 173–176, 1978.
 224. Swanson, C. H., and A. K. Solomon. Evidence for Na‐H exchange in the rabbit pancreas. Nature Lond. 236: 183–184, 1972.
 225. Swanson, C. H., and A. K. Solomon. A micropuncture investigation of the whole tissue mechanism of electrolyte secretion by the in vitro rabbit pancreas. J. Gen. Physiol. 62: 407–429, 1973.
 226. Swanson, C. H., and A. K. Solomon. Micropuncture analysis of the cellular mechanisms of electrolyte secretion by the in vitro rabbit pancreas. J. Gen. Physiol. 65: 22–45, 1975.
 227. Takahashi, H. Scanning electron microscopy of the rat exocrine pancreas. Arch. Histol. Jpn. 47: 387–404, 1984.
 228. Takahaski, M., P. Pour, J. Althoff, and T. Donnelly. The pancreas of the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). I. Anatomical study. Lab. Anim. Sci. 27: 336–342, 1977.
 229. Taylor, R. B. Pancreatic secretion in the sheep. Res. Vet. Sci. 3: 63–77, 1962.
 230. Ternouth, J. H., and H. L. Buttle. Concurrent studies on the flow of digesta in the duodenum and of exocrine pancreatic secretion of calves. The collection of the exocrine pancreatic secretion from a duodenal cannula. Br. J. Nutr. 29: 387–397, 1973.
 231. Tompkins, R. K., and S. L. Kuchenbecker. Relationship of cyclic AMP to secretin stimulation of the pancreas. J. Surg. Res. 14: 172–176, 1973.
 232. Turnberg, L. A., F. A. Bieberdorf, S. G. Morawski, and J. S. Fordtran. Interrelationships of chloride, bicarbonate, sodium and hydrogen transport in the human ileum. J. Clin. Invest. 49: 557–567, 1970.
 233. Ueda, N., and O. H. Petersen. The dependence of caerulein‐evoked pancreatic fluid secretion on the extracellular calcium concentrations. Pfluegers Arch. 370: 179–183, 1977.
 234. Ueda, N., Y. Suzuki, M. Utsumi, T. Obara, K. Okamura, and M. Namiki. Electrophysiological studies on the cultured cells obtained from transplantable pancreatic carcinoma in Syrian golden hamsters. Peptides Fayetteville 5: 423–428, 1984.
 235. Ussing, H. H., D. Erlij, and U. Lassen. Transport pathways in biological membranes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 36: 17–49, 1974.
 236. Van Amelsvoort, J. M. M., J. W. C. M. Jansen, J. J. H. H. M. De Pont, and S. L. Bonting. Is there a plasma membrane located anion‐sensitive ATPase? IV. Distribution of the enzyme in rat pancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 512: 296–308, 1978.
 237. Van Driessche, W., and W. Zeiske. Ionic channels in epithelial cell membranes. Physiol. Rev. 65: 833–903, 1985.
 238. Vaughan‐Jones, R. D. Chloride activity and its control in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 299: 537–548, 1982.
 239. Vaysse, N., J. P. Esteve, B. Brenac, J. P. Moatti, and J. P. Pascal. Action of dopamine on cyclic AMP‐tissue level in the rat pancreas. Interaction with secretin. Biomedicine Paris 28: 342–347, 1978.
 240. Vega, D. F., E. Martinez‐Victoria, A. Esteller, and A. Murillo. Secretion of pancreatic juice in response to nervous and hormonal stimulation in the anaesthetized monkey (Erhythrocebus patas and Papio mandrillus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol. 58: 259–264, 1977.
 241. Vinnicombe, S. J., and M. D. Kendall. The accessory pancreatic ducts of the starling Sturnus vulgaris: an ultrastructural and light microscopic study. J. Anat. 137: 341–355, 1983.
 242. Wallace, D. H., and O. D. Hegre. Development in vitro of epithelial‐cell monolayers derived from fetal rat pancreas. In Vitro Rockville 15: 270–277, 1979.
 243. Watanabe, T., and M. Yasuda. Electron microscopic study on the innervation of the pancreas of the domestic fowl. Cell Tissue Res. 180: 453–465, 1977.
 244. Watari, N. Fine structure of nervous elements in the pancreas of some vertebrates. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 85: 291–314, 1968.
 245. Way, L. W., and J. M. Diamond. The effect of secretin on electrical potential differences in the pancreatic duct. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 203: 298–307, 1970.
 246. Way, L. W., and M. I. Grossman. Pancreatic stimulation by duodenal acid and exogenous hormones in conscious cats. Am. J. Physiol. 219: 449–454, 1970.
 247. Widdicombe, J. H., M. J. Welsh, and W. E. Finkbeiner. Cystic fibrosis decreases the apical membrane chloride permeability of monolayers cultured from cells of tracheal epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 6167–6171, 1985.
 248. Williams, D. W., and M. D. Kendall. The ultrastructure of the centroacinar cells within the pancreas of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J. Anat. 135: 173–181, 1982.
 249. Wizemann, V., A.‐L. Christian, J. Wiechmann, and I. Schulz. The distribution of membrane bound enzymes in the acini and ducts of the cat pancreas. Pfluegers Arch. 347: 39–47, 1974.
 250. Wizemann, V., and I. Schulz. Influence of amphotericin, amiloride, ionophores and 2,4‐dinitrophenol on the secretion of the isolated cat's pancreas. Pfluegers Arch. 339: 317–338, 1973.
 251. Wright, E. M., and J. M. Diamond. Anion selectivity in biological membranes. Physiol. Rev. 57: 109–156, 1977.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

R. M. Case, B. E. Argent. Pancreatic Secretion of Electrolytes and Water. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 18: Handbook of Physiology, The Gastrointestinal System, Salivary, Gastric, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary Secretion: 383-417. First published in print 1989. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp060320