Comprehensive Physiology Wiley Online Library

Membrane Structure/Proteins

Full Article on Wiley Online Library



Abstract

The sections in this article are:

1 Environment
1.1 null
2 What do Proteins Look Like? Information Derived from Water‐Soluble Proteins
2.1 Hierarchy of Structures
2.2 Subunit Molecular Weights
2.3 Conformational Flexibility
2.4 Structural Families
3 Membrane Proteins
3.1 Bacteriorhodopsin
3.2 Porin
3.3 Photosynthetic Reaction Centers
3.4 Light‐Harvesting Complex
3.5 Concluding Comment
4 Speculative Structures
5 Structure‐Function Relationship—Minimal Requirements
5.1 Conformational Change
5.2 Transport Pathway Across the Membrane
5.3 Absorption of Light
6 Structure‐Function Relationship—Speculative Models
6.1 Voltage‐Sensitive Ion Channels
6.2 Light‐Driven Proton Pump
6.3 ATP‐Driven Ca2+ Pump
6.4 G‐Protein Coupled Receptors
7 Appendix: Methods for Structure Determination
7.1 Primary Structure
7.2 Molecular Weight
7.3 Secondary Structure
7.4 Tertiary and Quaternary Structure
7.5 X‐ray Diffraction
7.6 Electron Microscopy
7.7 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
7.8 Compilations of Protein Structures
Figure 1. Figure 1.

Schematic diagram (drawn to scale) of a phosphatidylcholine bilayer and segments of a hypothetical intrinsic membrane protein. The bilayer is fluid and what is shown is a two‐dimensional cross section of it. The apparently empty spaces within it must be imagined as filled with portions of lipid chains that protrude into the pictured cross‐section from adjacent cross‐sections. The hypothetical protein segments are drawn as a bundle of helices, imagined as parts of a single protein molecule, joined together outside the bilayer domain by other parts of the protein polypeptide chain. The small shaded particles are H2O molecules.

From Reynolds and McCaslin 21 with permission
Figure 2. Figure 2.

Schematic diagrams showing the topologies of three families of nucleotide binding proteins: (a) for ATP, (b) for GTP, (c) for NAD. All of them contain alternating α‐helices and β‐strands, shown respectively as cylinders and arrows, but the specified arrangements are different. All six β‐strands in (c) are parallel, for example, whereas five are parallel and one is antiparallel in (b).

From Brändén 4 with permission
Figure 3. Figure 3.

Schematic ribbon diagram for the three‐dimensional structure of actin, which contains an ATP binding site similar to (a) in Figure 2. The letters and numbers in this diagram identify the amino acids in the sequence at which α‐helices begin and terminate. The ATP binding site is in the cleft between the domains in the lower center of the picture, each domain containing an arrangement of α‐helices and β‐sheets such as those in (a) of Figure 2.

From Kabsch et al. 15 with permission
Figure 4. Figure 4.

Two functionally unrelated proteins which nevertheless have identical structural topology (and even a similar disulfide bond) over a major part of their three‐dimensional structures. The enzyme superoxide dismutase with Cu and Zn atoms at its active center is on the left. The variable domain of the heavy chain of immunoglobulin G is on the right. The principal structure in both cases is so‐called β‐barrel, composed of seven strands of β‐sheet.

Based on a drawing by D. Richardson
Figure 5. Figure 5.

Overall chain trace of bacteriorhodopsin showing helices as solid rods. The N terminus (nt) is at the bottom at the extracellular surface; the C terminus (ct) is at the top at the cytoplasmic surface. The helices range from 30 to 40 Å in length, sufficient to span the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer. The retinal is attached by a Schiff base linkage to Lys 216 (helix G) and is tilted roughly 20° out of the plane of the membrane.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission
Figure 6. Figure 6.

Ribbon diagram of matrix porin from E. coli. Arrows represent β‐strands and are labelled 1–16 starting from the strand after the first short turn. The short β‐strand at the N terminus continues the C‐terminal strand β 16. The long loops are denoted L1‐L8, the short turns at the other end T1‐T8. Loop L2 protrudes towards the viewer. Loop L3 folds inside the barrel.

From Cowan et al. 8 with permission
Figure 7. Figure 7.

Proposed arrangements of the polypeptide chains of the principal subunits of three transmembrane ion channels: Na+ channel from rat brain, Ca2+ channel from rabbit skeletal muscle, and A‐current K+ channel from Drosophila. Na+ channel polypeptides from various sources range in size from 1832 to 2012 amino acid residues. Similarly, the Ca+ channel polypeptide consists of 2005 residues. The K+ channel protein, however, is only 616 residues long. Putative trans‐membrane helices are shown as numbered cylinders.

From Catterall 6 with permission
Figure 8. Figure 8.

Sliding helix model of voltage‐dependent gating. Movement of the S4 helix of domain IV of the Na+ channel in response to membrane depolarization. The proposed helix is illustrated as a cylinder with a spiral ribbon of positive charge. At the resting membrane potential (left) all positively charged residues are paired with fixed negative charges on other transmembrane segments of the channel and the transmembrane segment is held in that position by the negative internal membrane potential. Depolarization reduces the force holding the positive charges in their inward position. The S4 helix is then proposed to undergo a spiral motion through a rotation of approximately 60° and an outward displacement of approximately 5 Å. This movement leaves an unpaired negative charge on the inward surface of the membrane and reveals an unpaired positive charge on the outward surface to give a net charge transfer of +1.

From Catterall 6 with permission
Figure 9. Figure 9.

Artistic impression showing the relationship between the key residues Asp 85, Asp 96, Asp 212, Lys 216, and Arg 82 and the retinal binding site, the proton channel and overall molecular boundary for the ground state of bacteriorhodopsin. The cytoplasm is at the top of the diagram.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission
Figure 10. Figure 10.

A diagram to describe the 4 proton movements in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. (a) Structure before isomerization of the retinal. (b) Proton transfer from Schiff base to Asp 85. (c) Proton transfers from Asp 96 to Schiff base and from Asp 85 to the extracellular space. (d) Proton transfer from the cytoplasmic surface to Asp 96.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission
Figure 11. Figure 11.

Pictorial representation of the successive stages of the Ca+2 binding domain of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump. The binding cavity is assumed to extend physically into the cytoplasm and its inner surface is assumed to possess a net negative charge. E1 and E2 are the names given to the two principal conformational states with access to opposite sides of the membrane. Ex, Ey, and Ez are variants of E1 which had to be assumed to account for details of the experimental data for Ca2+ binding from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.

From Tanford et al. 24 with permission
Figure 12. Figure 12.

Speculative model for free energy coupling in the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump. It is suggested that the binding of Ca+2 (Fig. 11) brings the ATP binding region and the phosphorylation site into close proximity, permitting the transfer of the terminal phosphate group of ATP from one site to the other.

From Tanford et al. 24 with permission


Figure 1.

Schematic diagram (drawn to scale) of a phosphatidylcholine bilayer and segments of a hypothetical intrinsic membrane protein. The bilayer is fluid and what is shown is a two‐dimensional cross section of it. The apparently empty spaces within it must be imagined as filled with portions of lipid chains that protrude into the pictured cross‐section from adjacent cross‐sections. The hypothetical protein segments are drawn as a bundle of helices, imagined as parts of a single protein molecule, joined together outside the bilayer domain by other parts of the protein polypeptide chain. The small shaded particles are H2O molecules.

From Reynolds and McCaslin 21 with permission


Figure 2.

Schematic diagrams showing the topologies of three families of nucleotide binding proteins: (a) for ATP, (b) for GTP, (c) for NAD. All of them contain alternating α‐helices and β‐strands, shown respectively as cylinders and arrows, but the specified arrangements are different. All six β‐strands in (c) are parallel, for example, whereas five are parallel and one is antiparallel in (b).

From Brändén 4 with permission


Figure 3.

Schematic ribbon diagram for the three‐dimensional structure of actin, which contains an ATP binding site similar to (a) in Figure 2. The letters and numbers in this diagram identify the amino acids in the sequence at which α‐helices begin and terminate. The ATP binding site is in the cleft between the domains in the lower center of the picture, each domain containing an arrangement of α‐helices and β‐sheets such as those in (a) of Figure 2.

From Kabsch et al. 15 with permission


Figure 4.

Two functionally unrelated proteins which nevertheless have identical structural topology (and even a similar disulfide bond) over a major part of their three‐dimensional structures. The enzyme superoxide dismutase with Cu and Zn atoms at its active center is on the left. The variable domain of the heavy chain of immunoglobulin G is on the right. The principal structure in both cases is so‐called β‐barrel, composed of seven strands of β‐sheet.

Based on a drawing by D. Richardson


Figure 5.

Overall chain trace of bacteriorhodopsin showing helices as solid rods. The N terminus (nt) is at the bottom at the extracellular surface; the C terminus (ct) is at the top at the cytoplasmic surface. The helices range from 30 to 40 Å in length, sufficient to span the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer. The retinal is attached by a Schiff base linkage to Lys 216 (helix G) and is tilted roughly 20° out of the plane of the membrane.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission


Figure 6.

Ribbon diagram of matrix porin from E. coli. Arrows represent β‐strands and are labelled 1–16 starting from the strand after the first short turn. The short β‐strand at the N terminus continues the C‐terminal strand β 16. The long loops are denoted L1‐L8, the short turns at the other end T1‐T8. Loop L2 protrudes towards the viewer. Loop L3 folds inside the barrel.

From Cowan et al. 8 with permission


Figure 7.

Proposed arrangements of the polypeptide chains of the principal subunits of three transmembrane ion channels: Na+ channel from rat brain, Ca2+ channel from rabbit skeletal muscle, and A‐current K+ channel from Drosophila. Na+ channel polypeptides from various sources range in size from 1832 to 2012 amino acid residues. Similarly, the Ca+ channel polypeptide consists of 2005 residues. The K+ channel protein, however, is only 616 residues long. Putative trans‐membrane helices are shown as numbered cylinders.

From Catterall 6 with permission


Figure 8.

Sliding helix model of voltage‐dependent gating. Movement of the S4 helix of domain IV of the Na+ channel in response to membrane depolarization. The proposed helix is illustrated as a cylinder with a spiral ribbon of positive charge. At the resting membrane potential (left) all positively charged residues are paired with fixed negative charges on other transmembrane segments of the channel and the transmembrane segment is held in that position by the negative internal membrane potential. Depolarization reduces the force holding the positive charges in their inward position. The S4 helix is then proposed to undergo a spiral motion through a rotation of approximately 60° and an outward displacement of approximately 5 Å. This movement leaves an unpaired negative charge on the inward surface of the membrane and reveals an unpaired positive charge on the outward surface to give a net charge transfer of +1.

From Catterall 6 with permission


Figure 9.

Artistic impression showing the relationship between the key residues Asp 85, Asp 96, Asp 212, Lys 216, and Arg 82 and the retinal binding site, the proton channel and overall molecular boundary for the ground state of bacteriorhodopsin. The cytoplasm is at the top of the diagram.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission


Figure 10.

A diagram to describe the 4 proton movements in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. (a) Structure before isomerization of the retinal. (b) Proton transfer from Schiff base to Asp 85. (c) Proton transfers from Asp 96 to Schiff base and from Asp 85 to the extracellular space. (d) Proton transfer from the cytoplasmic surface to Asp 96.

From Henderson et al. 12 with permission


Figure 11.

Pictorial representation of the successive stages of the Ca+2 binding domain of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump. The binding cavity is assumed to extend physically into the cytoplasm and its inner surface is assumed to possess a net negative charge. E1 and E2 are the names given to the two principal conformational states with access to opposite sides of the membrane. Ex, Ey, and Ez are variants of E1 which had to be assumed to account for details of the experimental data for Ca2+ binding from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.

From Tanford et al. 24 with permission


Figure 12.

Speculative model for free energy coupling in the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump. It is suggested that the binding of Ca+2 (Fig. 11) brings the ATP binding region and the phosphorylation site into close proximity, permitting the transfer of the terminal phosphate group of ATP from one site to the other.

From Tanford et al. 24 with permission
References
 1. Allen, J. P., G. Feher, T. O. Yeates, H. Komiya, and D. C. Rees. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R‐26. The cofactors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84: 5730–5734, 1987.
 2. Allen, J. P., G. Feher, T. O. Yeates, H. Komiya, and D. C. Rees. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R‐26. Protein subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84: 6162–6166, 1987.
 3. Branden, C., and J. Tooze. Introduction to Protein Structure. New York: Garland, 1991.
 4. Brändén, C. I. Founding fathers and families. Nature 346: 607–608, 1990.
 5. Cantor, C. R. and P. R. Schimmel. Biophysical Chemistry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1980.
 6. Catterall, W. A. Structure and function of voltage‐sensitive ion channels. Science 242: 50–61, 1988.
 7. Chothia, C. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357: 543–544, 1992.
 8. Cowan, S. W., T. Schirmer, G. Rummel, M. Steiert, R. Ghosh, R. A. Pauptit, J. N. Jansonius, and J. P. Rosenbusch. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 358: 727–733, 1992.
 9. Diesenhofer, J., O. Epp, K. Miki, R. Huber, and H. Michel. X‐ray structure analysis of a membrane protein complex—electron density map of the chromophores of the photosynthetic reaction center from rhodopseudomonas viridis. J. Mol. Biol. 180: 385–398, 1984.
 10. Diesenhofer, J., O. Epp, K. Miki, R. Huber, and H. Michel. Structure of the protein subunits in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Nature 318: 618–623, 1985.
 11. Garavito, M. and J. P. Rosenbusch. Three‐dimensional crystals of an integral membrane protein: an initial x‐ray analysis. J. Cell Biol. 86: 327–329, 1980.
 12. Henderson, R., J. M. Baldwin, T. A. Ceska, E. Zemlin, E. Beckmann, and K. H. Downing. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high resolution electron cryo‐microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 213: 899–929, 1990.
 13. Henderson, R. and P.N.T. Unwin. Three dimensional model of the purple membrane obtained by electron microscopy. Nature 257: 28–32, 1975.
 14. Hendrickson, W. A., and K. Wütrich. Macromolecular Structures. Curr. Biol., New York: published annually.
 15. Kabsch, W., H. G. Mannherz, D. Suck, E. F. Pai, and K. C. Holmes. Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex. Nature 347: 37–44, 1990.
 16. Kühlbrandt, W. and D. N. Wang. Three‐dimensional structure of plant light‐harvesting complex determined by electron crystallography. Nature 350: 130–4, 1991.
 17. Langone J. J. (ed.). Methods in Enzymology. vol. 202, New York: Academic Press, 1991.
 18. Lesk, A. M. Protein Architecture: A Practical Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
 19. Matthews, I., R. P. Sharma, A. G. Lee, and J. M. East. Trans‐membranous organization of (Ca‐Mg) ATPase from sarcoplasmic reticulum; evidence for lumenal location of residues 877–888. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 18737–18740, 1990.
 20. Nielsen, T. B. and J. A. Reynolds. Measurements of molecular weights by gel electrophoresis. Meth. Enzymol. 48: 1–20. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
 21. Reynolds, J. A., and D. R. McCaslin. The role of detergents in membrane reconstitution. Subcell. Biochem. 14: 1–23, 1989.
 22. Reynolds, J. A., and C. Tanford. Determination of molecular weight of the protein moiety in protein‐detergent complexes without direct knowledge of detergent binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73: 4467–4470, 1976.
 23. Stokes, D. L., and N. M. Green. Structure of Ca‐ATPase: electron microscopy of frozen‐hydrated crystals at 6 A resolution in projection. J. Mol. Biol. 213: 529–38, 1990.
 24. Tanford, C., J. A. Reynolds, and E. A. Johnson. Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump: a model for Ca2+ binding and Ca2+ coupled phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84: 7094–8, 1987.
 25. Watt, R. M., and J. A. Reynolds. Interaction of apolipoprotein B from human serum low‐density lipoprotein with egg yolk phosphatidylcholine. Biochemistry 20: 3897–3901, 1981.
 26. Wütrich, K. Protein structure determination in solution by NMR spectroscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 22059–22062, 1990.

Contact Editor

Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite

Charles Tanford, Jacqueline A. Reynolds. Membrane Structure/Proteins. Compr Physiol 2011, Supplement 31: Handbook of Physiology, Cell Physiology: 59-74. First published in print 1997. doi: 10.1002/cphy.cp140103